Escape to the Movies: War Horse

maturin

New member
Jul 20, 2010
702
0
0
I rarely cry during movies. I'm not an animal person and I don't get hit too hard by animal movie tearjerkers.

But within two seconds of seeing the trailer, I knew this movie was going to make me cry. Incessantly. Fuck, I teared up before the trailer ended. I almost started crying during the REVIEW.

What the fuck? Is anyone else in this predicament? I'm scared to go see it now.
 

triggrhappy94

New member
Apr 24, 2010
3,376
0
0
I was ready to hear that this wasn't good, especially not being a huge fan of Speilsberg.
I'll have to consider it and may get dragged into going.
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
While I won't begrudge anyone having seen this, nor will I argue that it probably is a decent film I still can't see myself really enjoying this.

The first thing I thought when I saw the trailer was "Oh Good another entry in the seemingly endless string of "Super Horse" movies."
 

NinjaDC

New member
Jan 24, 2010
31
0
0
Just got back from the theater, all I have to say is this review nailed it.
The tone of this movie is right out of the 50's/60s movies, that just had a pure heart about them.
No movie today really does this.
It just has a good, chicken soap for the soul vibe that will either greatly please or annoy.
I think your opinion on this film all comes down to a line from it,"Its just a horse, not a dog"
If you are able to emotionally connect to the horse like many movies do with dogs(like Marly & me), you will love this movie.
But if you are a person that would say, "its just a horse" then you will hate it.

All I have to say is I'm from Kentucky, and I took my mom to see it as a Christmas present,
she balled several times
I felt emotionally at ease ,and that it was even worth the extra 5$ per ticket for the reserved luxury seats.
 

Gordon_4_v1legacy

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,577
0
0
RTR said:
There's jokes to be made here about how FiM fans will react to this, but I'm not going to (I can't think of anything).
Hopefully, this means Dragon Tattoo will be the new year's show.

Anyway, Happy Holidays, everybody!
Well as a Brony, I saw draft that horse into Celestia's Royal Guards. Clearly has the stones for it.


This looks like a good old timey movie, might check it out on cheap Tuesday.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
Lex Darko said:
The Gentleman said:
I'll take Bob's word that it is a good movie, but given that I despise animal-driven narratives, especially ones that under any other director would be classified as Oscar-bait, I'll probably pass on this one.
OMG this. So much this. I couldn't find the words to describe what I wanted to express without being unjustifiably negative.

So, thank you sir and have a good day.
heh, I was spewing that exact sentiment all the way to the theatre when my parents demanded that I take my younger brother to see it, but it's actually pretty good, especially for an animal-driven narrative.

Still didn't end up giving a shit about the horse (despite some characters in the film apparently valuing the horse's life over human lives), but the movie is pretty excellently made and there's a hella awesome charge-through-No-Man's-Land scene (British soldiers, not the horse). Most of the side stories were well done too. Basically, it has enough good stuff going on in the background to make up for the "boy and horse get separated and then reunite" main plot.
 

Muspelheim

New member
Apr 7, 2011
2,023
0
0
Finally, something that isn't sarcastic or ironic on the horizon! Yes, investing yourself in the fate and wellbeing of a horse in one of the most horrific wars mankind has had is a bit loopy on paper, but I think the subject of human suffering during the Great War is... Well covered, to say the least.

All things considered, I think it's refreshing that we lend a thought to all the animals we've dragged with us into manmade hell throughout history, espescially considering that I've been conditioned by mediocre fantasy and tireless World of Warcraft aether-mounts to reguard them as soulless automatons, ment to get people from point A to B. Possibly also stand on its hind legs and neigh dramatically for a heroic moment. Humans dying in stupid wars is an awful thing, but it's very well covered. Animals being dragged into concepts they can't even understand by the thumbies is rather covered as well, but usually not very well.
Furthermore, I haven't had a good, whimpering cry in a good while, now. Last time was the London National Theatre's Frankenstein, and honestly... There's nothing quite like sobbing in a seated theatre while failing to pretend you're not.

I honestly don't see why it's such a transgression to attempt to tug a few heartstrings. Well, alright, it's irritating when it all falls flat because it's poorly executed or just cramed into something that doesn't warrant it. But for War Horse and the like (All together now; Toy Story 3!) I don't really see the problem. You know full well what you're getting in to, you know you will be asked to sympathise for something or other at some point. And honestly, at this current moment in pop culture where we are all too jaded and detached to fall for their pathetic attempts at evoking our feelings, that is very welcome indeed. Nothing to hide, just a cute horse that's miserable and lots of people dying.

"Oh, for heaven's sake, someone just give the poor thing a bleedin' apple already!" D:
 

BakedZnake

New member
Sep 27, 2010
128
0
0
The Cheezy One said:
BakedZnake said:
Did he say german tanks in WW1? OMG parallel universe! Lets hope they dont discover radar in WW2
...What? Are you being sarcastic? Germany did have tanks in WW1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_I_tanks_of_Germany
But you listed a bunch of tanks which were most of them prototypes and none were operational before the end of the war. And most of them look quite funky, straight of a steam-punk story

Looks like War House isn't going to be shown till mid-late January in the UK :(
 

Numberatu

New member
Apr 6, 2011
9
0
0
Definitely doesn't start in Ireland.
Weird, I got fed up after Joey's was captured for the first time, leaving my family to watch the rest.The opening scenes were like someone took every cliché about turn of the century England and glued them together, combined with overacting - the only thing that jumped into my head was the reference in Tropic Thunder to one character's disastrous film called "Simple Jack", the tale of a mentally handicapped boy who can interact with animals. Scenes such as the faithful country lad jumping in front of the shotgun (for a horse, remember), or the alcoholic father being carefully shown the error of his ways and dissolving in tears just in no way worked- they either seemed overacted as hell, or downright stupid.

The familial reaction was undisguised irritation and/or dislike, with accusations of it being far too corny, the attempts at making you feel emotion being so mechanical and clunky that it was almost yelling "BE SAD NOW", the portrayal of the war being simply bad, and the film as a whole being tacky and awful. In summary: don't see it.

By the way, this is coming from someone who read and enjoyed the book when younger (read it, or if you can go see the play- just don't see the film), has read a fair few historical books and indeed memoirs about WW1 and is genuinely interested in the setting- if you want a good book that does a better job (albeit more adult than War Horse) of looking at the sadness of the war, try Somme Mud by Edward Lynch (mostly-autobiographical, well written, fascinating).

Edit:I understand the whole "innocent being is thrust into the middle of man made terror and misery" plot, but its just not very well done here. Then again, I'm a cynical git. It did however manage to make my little sister weep endlessly, so I suppose mission re. small girls was accomplished. Oh, and John Williams' "epic" (seems the best description) score just reinforces the ham-handedness with which it was done.
 

Extragorey

New member
Dec 24, 2010
566
0
0
The Cheezy One said:
BakedZnake said:
Did he say german tanks in WW1? OMG parallel universe! Lets hope they dont discover radar in WW2
...What? Are you being sarcastic? Germany did have tanks in WW1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_I_tanks_of_Germany
BabySinclair said:
BakedZnake said:
Did he say german tanks in WW1? OMG parallel universe! Lets hope they dont discover radar in WW2
Germany had tanks in WWI. Now tanks only entered the battlefield in 1916 and Germany never really had that many but they did exist.
Yureina said:
BakedZnake said:
Did he say german tanks in WW1? OMG parallel universe! Lets hope they dont discover radar in WW2
Germany did have tanks in WW1, though most of them were captured British tanks.
He was being sarcastic. Everyone knows radar was "discovered" before WW2.

Anyway, I just had the chance to watch this movie the other day, and I have to say I thoroughly enjoyed it. The scene between the German and British soldiers in no-man's-land was particularly powerful, but so was the reunion scene shortly afterwards.
It's not an amazing, original film - you can see most of the plot twists (if indeed they are twists) coming, and because it's a Steven Spielberg film (who is apparently so famous that his name is in Firefox's spellchecker dictionary) you know it's going to have one of those tear-jerking happy endings.

Still, it was an enjoyable experience while it lasted.

Oh, and Captcha: swan song. Let's hope that's not that case, huh?