I'm still slightly miffed at the stage version taking Best Play over my much-beloved Jerusalem, but I thought at the time that it would work better as a film. Guess I thought along the right lines then. Probably will give this a look after GWtDT.
Umm... What? Tanks were in WW1 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanks_in_World_War_I], man.BakedZnake said:Did he say german tanks in WW1? OMG parallel universe! Lets hope they dont discover radar in WW2
Thank you for being the only person to say this.TaboriHK said:In a war where thousands upon thousands of human beings who didn't want to be there and weren't affected by the outcome just as much, I can't imagine giving a damn about a horse. Even if the orchestra is pulling for him. Does the movie close with the horse coming home, embittered by war, to write a taut yet revealing look at the horrors of war? It's a goddamn HORSE!
I'm not here to convince you to see it. I'm just here to suggest that you should watch a movie before assuming anything. Come from a place of knowledge before you come from a place of ignorance. I was with you in your comment before you said the above. Tight on cash? Right there with you. Assuming a movie has a moral you don't agree with? That is not worth the time.urprobablyright said:Imagine LOTR if in the end Frodo failed like a ***** and the moral of the story is: "These things cannot be defeated/avoided, so don't let them happen in the first place"... That's pretty much the moral of Warhorse as much as I can tell, and it's not worth the time or money.
Read/watch "All Quiet on the Western Front" if you want to see something about the human suffering in that war. The idea with the horse is that it's completely innoncent and has nothing to do with this war. It's like throwing a child into that scenario. Feeling sorry for it is a perfectly normal human reaction to this, at least in the context of a movie where the horse has a relatable personality.wwmcfar said:Thank you for being the only person to say this.TaboriHK said:In a war where thousands upon thousands of human beings who didn't want to be there and weren't affected by the outcome just as much, I can't imagine giving a damn about a horse. Even if the orchestra is pulling for him. Does the movie close with the horse coming home, embittered by war, to write a taut yet revealing look at the horrors of war? It's a goddamn HORSE!
World War one claimed the lives of countless living breathing men women and children and I'm supposed to get emotionally invested in a mistreated horse. Give me a gun and I'll shoot every dammed horse in the world before I see one person harmed.
Spielberg should have put a dog that got beaten every now and then in Schindler's List then at least all the PETA freaks and animal fanatics would have something to give a crap about as the poor Jews were led to the gas chambers.
The deal is that the original Swedish production trilogy was an international hit both on critic level and box office (completely shattered the international box office record for a Swedish movie, about 100M$, while previous record was like what 14-16M), for them it would be on level with the original Star Wars trilogy, rain money out of nowhere, since they mostly just make movie for their artistic value, so just have habit of trying to recoup the cost of their movie usually.MarsProbe said:Interesting...probably not the type of film I'd go to see in the cinema.
Also, what is the big deal with people seemingly being desperate for Bob to review Girl with the Dragon Tattoo? Actually, what is the big deal with The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, full stop?
Yes, I get it, it's the director. If you're so keen in finding out how the film has turned out, why not just go and see it? You don't need to wait for someone to review it surely.
link for the unknowledgable? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanks_in_World_War_IBakedZnake said:Did he say german tanks in WW1? OMG parallel universe! Lets hope they dont discover radar in WW2
...along with everyone else, which is the same point he's making about War Horse. I don't remember many, in fact, any people calling out Toy Story 3 for "cheap exploits". True as it may be, it was still affecting. So I guess War Horse is another one of those.Reptiloid said:"I'm as guilty as any other critic of being reflexively resistant to sentimental and emotional manipulation."
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, oh Bob... you really crack me up. That was the funniest joke I've ever heard from you. I really hope it was a joke though.
You haven't forgotten the cheap exploits of Toy Story 3 already? You know, the ones you totally fell for.
Yes, because nobody in show business has ever made a comment on the human cost of war before. Oh no wait, they have, quite a lot actually...wwmcfar said:Thank you for being the only person to say this.TaboriHK said:In a war where thousands upon thousands of human beings who didn't want to be there and weren't affected by the outcome just as much, I can't imagine giving a damn about a horse. Even if the orchestra is pulling for him. Does the movie close with the horse coming home, embittered by war, to write a taut yet revealing look at the horrors of war? It's a goddamn HORSE!
World War one claimed the lives of countless living breathing men women and children and I'm supposed to get emotionally invested in a mistreated horse. Give me a gun and I'll shoot every dammed horse in the world before I see one person harmed.
Spielberg should have put a dog that got beaten every now and then in Schindler's List then at least all the PETA freaks and animal fanatics would have something to give a crap about as the poor Jews were led to the gas chambers.
That film was made years ago.Mr.Tea said:Awww... With it opening on a Tuesday, I really hoped this video would be about The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo.