I know there have to be some people on this site who watch Fox...why do you? Is it for comedic purposes, or do you consider it a legitimate news source?
There's commentary and there's news. Whatever the news anchors and specialists say, Fox News is a NEWS outlet, therefore it reports the news, not preaching the Quran or talking about how to hideKieran Villoth said:I know there have to be some people on this site who watch Fox...why do you? Is it for comedic purposes, or do you consider it a legitimate news source?
Alright, I can see where you're coming from with the legitimacy, but why not go to BBC, or some news source that isn't as biased?farson135 said:Fox is as legitimate a news source as MSNBC, CNN, or Pravda. I read and watch as many news shows and newspapers (online) as I can because I hope if I get enough versions of a story I will find something approaching the truth.
However one wonders if the OP actually has a purpose in asking this question (i.e. a quest for knowledge) or if this is just more bullshit. I expect it is the latter but let us see how this goes before I pass judgment.
Because every news source is biased. The best historian is the one you can identify his bias and then be able to read his writings while ignoring his bias. When you do not know what is his bias, you take everything he writes as truth.Kieran Villoth said:Alright, I can see where you're coming from with the legitimacy, but why not go to BBC, or some news source that isn't as biased?farson135 said:Fox is as legitimate a news source as MSNBC, CNN, or Pravda. I read and watch as many news shows and newspapers (online) as I can because I hope if I get enough versions of a story I will find something approaching the truth.
However one wonders if the OP actually has a purpose in asking this question (i.e. a quest for knowledge) or if this is just more bullshit. I expect it is the latter but let us see how this goes before I pass judgment.
Brett Baier and Shephard Smith are arguably the best shows in their respective time slots. Also Chris Wallace is good and every now and then Fox and Friends will do something entertaining thats not especially politics related.Kieran Villoth said:I know there have to be some people on this site who watch Fox...why do you? Is it for comedic purposes, or do you consider it a legitimate news source?
Not too sure about that. I remember seeing something about Canada not allowing Fox news start a Canadian branch because it doesn't legally qualify as "news" a few years back. I'd say that MSNBC probably sits in the same category, but CNN is quite a bit above that.farson135 said:Fox is as legitimate a news source as MSNBC, CNN, or Pravda.
Honestly, the problem most people have with FOX is their commentators, who are notoriously aggressive to the point of belligerence. But, they are also FOX's biggest money maker, so that's not likely to change.Aussie502 said:Living in Australia, most of our news and political commentators tend to not be so blatently bias towards a certain wing of politics. However, I decided (for some awful reason) to watch the Fox News station to see what was happening over in the States, and a show called "The Five" was on and I've never seen such a horrible show in all my life. There were 4 conservatives ganging up on 1 liberal the entire hour it was on. Is this was Fox calls "fair and balanced"? Now, maybe watching 1 hour of Fox isn't long enough to make a fair judgement but the things those people argued about were disgraceful and it made me want to scream at the TV.
I feel sorry for you guys who have to put up with it in your faces everyday of your life.
I watch it because it provides me with entertainment.Kieran Villoth said:I know there have to be some people on this site who watch Fox...why do you? Is it for comedic purposes, or do you consider it a legitimate news source?