Everyone Who Ever Bought a Madden Game is Suing EA

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
gigastar said:
Woodsey said:
If people buy the bloody things then that's up to them, and they cost the same as other games anyway.
I do see what you mean there but its harder to say its worth it for the sucession of NFL games. I doubt EA Sports puts in much effort to actually developing them. Controls are always the same, innovation is to them what a cheeseburger is to a lactose intolerant hindu, and really every time i compare this years and last years games i cant help wondering if they didnt just reskin the character models then change around the playable rooster names.
Yeah, well that's their prerogative, and you buying it is yours. I don't see how a lawsuit factors into this at all.
 

TheEternal01

New member
Feb 26, 2011
14
0
0
I wonder if i get paid for each year that i own that'd be pretty sweet lol. Even if i dont get money i'd love to see someone like 2k sports allowed back in the mix their monopoly has destroyed the game over the years constantly removing features and making up token changes to the online play (and making a game mode called ultimate team where the only way to truly compete more then 5 games is to dump cash into "dlc" decks)
 

warrcry13

New member
Jun 6, 2010
283
0
0
Wait I got a free copy of NCAA When I bought my xbox 360 does that mean I'm suing them too?
 

TheEternal01

New member
Feb 26, 2011
14
0
0
unless you were tramatized in a way only a team of highly trained shrinks could eleviate i doubt you can get a refund for a free game
 

AT God

New member
Dec 24, 2008
564
0
0
I must be maliformed because I thought owning a monopoly was good, and not just because you can buy hotels.

Is having a monopoly on a product illegal?
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Woodsey said:
gigastar said:
Woodsey said:
If people buy the bloody things then that's up to them, and they cost the same as other games anyway.
I do see what you mean there but its harder to say its worth it for the sucession of NFL games. I doubt EA Sports puts in much effort to actually developing them. Controls are always the same, innovation is to them what a cheeseburger is to a lactose intolerant hindu, and really every time i compare this years and last years games i cant help wondering if they didnt just reskin the character models then change around the playable rooster names.
Yeah, well that's their prerogative, and you buying it is yours. I don't see how a lawsuit factors into this at all.
I probably should have mentioned this, but i wouldnt even buy anything from EA Sports to use as overkill sci-fi style coasters. I have CoD for that.

Anyway this is what i think it boils down to.

EA Sports is the only developer that can legally make games based on NFL tournaments.

Other people either would want to try on thier own or think this is unfair for some arbitary reason.

Therefore, the other people would try something like this so they can get in on the market without getting sued into the storm drains by NFL for unlicensed usage of thier image or something like that.
 

Jesus Phish

New member
Jan 28, 2010
751
0
0
AT God said:
I must be maliformed because I thought owning a monopoly was good, and not just because you can buy hotels.

Is having a monopoly on a product illegal?
It must be now with all the companies getting sued over it.

I admit I was a bit pissed off when EA bought exclusive rights to the NFL. Never liked Madden, but loved the Sega 2k series. After I think 2k5 they had to stop using offical teams. Dont think I got another after that.
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
AT God said:
I must be maliformed because I thought owning a monopoly was good, and not just because you can buy hotels.

Is having a monopoly on a product illegal?
Not directly apparently but yes if the organization resource to unfair practices. It can also be a reason for big lawsuits, as microsoft knows very well.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
You know, maybe, if this works, it will send a message to other companies to not charge full price for game sequels that are the basically the same as their previous incarnation...
 

TheEternal01

New member
Feb 26, 2011
14
0
0
the problem is the last other company to make a NFL game was 2k sports with their ESPN version. and it sold for less for typical retail because the work involved in creating it didn't require it since most had been rebooted from the previous year. The problem with madden is it does little in the way of evolving year to year (often going backwards after destroying superstar mode slowly over the past couple years). its basically slapping a new main screen on a game with a roster update and kicking it out the door forcing fans of the sport to shell out $60 dollars for a game that by rights should cost about 30
 

Atros81

New member
Oct 26, 2010
21
0
0
Woodsey said:
gigastar said:
Woodsey said:
If people buy the bloody things then that's up to them, and they cost the same as other games anyway.
I do see what you mean there but its harder to say its worth it for the sucession of NFL games. I doubt EA Sports puts in much effort to actually developing them. Controls are always the same, innovation is to them what a cheeseburger is to a lactose intolerant hindu, and really every time i compare this years and last years games i cant help wondering if they didnt just reskin the character models then change around the playable rooster names.
Yeah, well that's their prerogative, and you buying it is yours. I don't see how a lawsuit factors into this at all.
The lawsuit is that due to the exclusivity contract, nobody else was allowed to develop a competing game, one which might have forced EA to actually innovate in order to stay competitive. Having to pay $50-$60 for what is essentially the same exact game that was released 6 years ago, but without having to spend much in development in the process, is basically getting screwed by monopolistic behavior. If 2K weren't locked out of developing a competing Football game, imagine how much better both it and Madden would be if they actually had to compete with features, along with having the updated roster.

As far as similar sequels... that I've little beef with. The problem comes from the fact that they prevented the potential development of a superior product to compete with it on the marketplace, which in turn stifled the drive to actually improve upon the design of Madden.
 

Worr Monger

New member
Jan 21, 2008
868
0
0
The real question is...

..when do we get to collectively sue EA for deliberately ruining Command & Conquer?
 

TheEternal01

New member
Feb 26, 2011
14
0
0
i actually loved 2k's NFL game, first person control of players on the field was pretty cool, and they did that "sports center" thing in franchise mode did to give a run down of high lights from around the league (something madden took 5 or 6 years to finally rip off with an NFL network version though slightly watered down). And monopolies are bad when abused, imagine if one company owned the rights to FPS's and rebooted the same MOH every game for 6 years with 0 changes. it'd be your right to stop playing FPS's but you wouldn't want to and as a true fan of the NFL with MANY friends who are obsessed being forced to pay full price just to have the latest team rosters is bull

also an amusing fact is operation sports held a tournament that year and against 64 other sports game it was voted the best of all time then EA bought the rights.
 

RedEyesBlackGamer

The Killjoy Detective returns!
Jan 23, 2011
4,701
0
0
scotth266 said:
Oh goody, I'm part of a class action lawsuit, and might therefore earn $5 when the case is won, if it is at all. Which it probably won't.
Yay for being part of a lawsuit! I wonder how much we would get? The last NFL-related monopoly charge won the plaintiffs...1$. You wanna split that?
 

TheEternal01

New member
Feb 26, 2011
14
0
0
they're probably reward players with a $5 discount off madden 2012 lol (rebate by mail of course)
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
AT God said:
I must be maliformed because I thought owning a monopoly was good, and not just because you can buy hotels.

Is having a monopoly on a product illegal?
In the US it is. And EA's the only one producing Football games. There was a time when 2K was making Football games. Vastly superior games at that, but then EA bought all right to the brand and all that.

Frankly I'm surprised it took this long for people to realize this.
 

RandV80

New member
Oct 1, 2009
1,507
0
0
I agree that they need to scrap the exclusive contract thing. But wouldn't an easily exploitable high selling game like Madden help fill EA's coffer's and allow them to create new riskier IP's?
 

Trucken

New member
Jan 26, 2009
707
0
0
I'd rather sue them for the unstable piece of shit Madden NFL 10 was.

"Alright, if I win 1 of the 2 following games I make the playoffs."
*Wins first match, game freezes before being able to save*
"Fuck!"
*Replays first match and loses. Game doesn't freeze*
"Aw, crap! OK, I can still make it, I just have to win the next game."
*Wins match, game freezes*
"What the FUCK!? OK, calm down, just replay it. I can beat them again."
*Replays match and loses. Game doesn't freeze*
"SUCK MY ASSHOLE EA!"

Pardon the language, but this actually happened. I think I used those exact words.