Excluding Women From E-Sports Does Not Legitimize It

Recommended Videos

Vareoth

New member
Mar 14, 2012
254
0
0
melkior said:
Due the successful lobby of Finnish e-sports Federation and Assembly organizers with other nordic and european e-sports federations, the International e-Sports federation has withdrawn the Gender rule.

http://www.assembly.org/summer14/news/iesf-rule-change
That was quick. Now I don't have to write a lengthy post about the futility of gender segregation in non-physical sports because IeSF already seems to understand the idiocy of their previous stance. Marvelous.

However, they seem to still want go ahead with the female only tournaments. Seems a bit redundant after this change. It could, however, serve as a more friendly way of introducing female gamers onto the professional stage.
 

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,507
594
118
Country
US
SurfKansas said:
The game publishers could very easily adjust their terms of use to prevent this from happening by inserting a clause that prohibits use of IP in for-profit tournaments that segregate based on gender.
They don't want a ban on tournaments that segregate by gender. They want a ban on tournaments that don't permit women. They want a setup like chess where there are tournaments in which anyone can compete, and tournaments in which only women can compete. You'd be surprised in how many forms of competition that is actually the norm. It's not just chess, but did you know that the NBA and NFL both technically admit women players if one can keep up with the men? Neither league has had a rule requiring players to be men for a long time (because that would be horrible and sexist for exactly the reasons that the WNBA [which does not admit men] isn't). There just aren't enough women who can compete in those sports at the same level as the men (a lot of people thought Brittany Griner would be the first woman to play in the NBA, but she went with WNBA and set a single game record and tied a career record in her first game).

RatRace123 said:
And they're kinda missing the point of gender exclusion in other sports, those ones actually involve physical activity and hard, brute force collisions. It makes sense that you don't see too many women linebackers in the NFL,
Actually, the NFL technically admits female players, but none have come through who can compete well enough against the men to actually get a spot on a team. The number who have ever tried out can be counted on your fingers. The most recent one was injured during tryouts.

Hiramas said:
Since women are often actively hindered in participating in things by misogynist words-i-am-not-allowed-to-say-here, a womens only league is perfectly allright. Of course it sounds strange and illogical to rage about the one thing but not the other, but our reality makes such things a necessity. Maybe one day we won't need them anymore.
Remember, if someone says mean words to a woman, she wilts like a flower and is incapable of competing against the mean man who said the mean words and potentially proving him wrong.

Or it could be like chess, where despite no relative biological advantage the best female players don't do that well against the best male players, which is then used as an excuse why female players shouldn't have to play against male players, and should accordingly have their own special women-only tournaments.

Mcoffey said:
Women-only leagues are a response to the sexist bullshit that is men-only leagues. It's either womens leagues or nothing. Maybe if you had actually read the article you might have figured that little detail out, hmmm?
Again I bring up chess. There are leagues open to anyone, and leagues only open to women. Women-only leagues aren't a response to men-only leagues in some kind of general case -- they're a response to women wanting to not have to compete against men, while not giving men the option not to compete against women (because keeping women out of a group is misogyny, but keeping men out of a group is empowerment).

Stu35 said:
That's not sexism, that's pure and simple fairness - let them compete in their own events so that they actually get to win something.

You can't claim the same thing with video games.
...or chess? Such a great example for this stuff.

What is such bullshit is the whole "If women can't or don't want to compete with men, then they shouldn't have to and that's OK. If men can't or don't want to compete with women, then they are sexist assholes who need to be punished" thing.
 

BeerTent

Resident Furry Pimp
May 8, 2011
1,167
0
0
I see what they're trying to do. Honestly. I really do.

But what they don't understand is why men and women don't compete in these sports together. The male body is significantly different then the female's body. Kinda goes without saying, so one party can unknowingly hurt the other party pretty easy by not factoring in these differences.

Basically, we want a team to be the exact same as the other team in terms of body type, to prevent injuries, and to keep things fair.

This... Change. This body type. It doesn't exist in videogaming. Everyone is the same no matter what. Sure, we can go into things like, "The male mind can navigate 3D better than a woman can." But that, in my eyes is such bullshit. Navigation is a skill. And skills can be learned by anyone.

Segregating men and women in the world of videogaming doesn't make sense, as everyone is on an equal footing. Unless, well... You're missing an arm.

Pretty sure women have two arms like men do. Can I get a confirmation on this? You might be surprised, but Tents also have two arms as well. Well, the cool ones anyway.
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
Jeezus. And I think it's bad enough that real sports are gender-segregated, but at least those have the excuse of not wanting men and women together in the locker rooms.
And the, you know, obvious and massive differences in physical capability between the genders.

OT: I'd probably have read the article a bit more focussedly if I considered e-sports to be sports in the first place. They're not, they're not, they're NOT FUCKING SPORTS! Even less so than motor sports, because at least that gives you a skillset that you can instantaneously benefit from in a variety of professions and situations in the real world. How the fuck does the ability to zerg-rush your opponent in 30 seconds or whatever benefit you in the real world?

Though I'm not saying gender segregation in this matter isn't bullshit of the highest order. There is no reason, absolutely no reason, why both sexes shouldn't be allowed to compete in the same tournament. And I'm utterly ashamed to see my home country, allegedly one of the paragons of gender equality, being the first one to be named in this article.
 

Rblade

New member
Mar 1, 2010
497
0
0
bartholen said:
OT: I'd probably have read the article a bit more focussedly if I considered e-sports to be sports in the first place. They're not, they're not, they're NOT FUCKING SPORTS! Even less so than motor sports, because at least that gives you a skillset that you can instantaneously benefit from in a variety of professions and situations in the real world. How the fuck does the ability to zerg-rush your opponent in 30 seconds or whatever benefit you in the real world?

Though I'm not saying gender segregation in this matter isn't bullshit of the highest order. There is no reason, absolutely no reason, why both sexes shouldn't be allowed to compete in the same tournament. And I'm utterly ashamed to see my home country, allegedly one of the paragons of gender equality, being the first one to be named in this article.
aside from the extreme hand eye coordination, on the fly problem solving, developing strategies with limited recourses and general multitasking. No way that could ever be practical abilities in the real world........

because see, it doesn't help you with either moving or stacking bricks so it must be pointless, we have dem computers to do the brainy stuff hur dur
 

Kerethos

New member
Jun 19, 2013
250
0
0
Separating genders in an sport where gender makes no difference is just pointless exclusion. I'm glad they've changed the rules to so that this is no longer a part of e-sports.

Gaming is, and should be, for everyone.
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Majinash said:
RaikuFA said:
If it were up to me, I'd have it all of "e-sports" removed. But that's wishful thinking.
Is there a reason for this? I'm curious because yours doesn't seem to be the only post with this sentiment.
Because the only people that participate in this crap are neckbeards who think only men who started playing fighters, LoL or whatever the second they got cut from the umbilical cord should play.

Imagine if Michael Jordan held a press conference. And he says in said conference "Anyone who started playing basketball for the first time after the year 2005 is not allowed to play basketball. If you find anyone playing basketball and they look too young to play it before 2005, you harass them, threaten to rape and kill their mothers, any means nessesary to make sure they never play basketball again. Also, no more WNBA and women aren't allowed to play ever again." He would becomes the biggest pariah in history. He wouldn't be able to walk down the street without someone laughing at him. But people who play e-sports, they encourage that line of thinking.
 

WarpZone

New member
Mar 9, 2008
423
0
0
If you ask me, the real problem here is the industry's fixation on trying to turn video games into something that they're not. They're not sports. They're not movies. They're not social media. They're not fucking Skymall. They're goddamned video games. Cut out all that superfluous bullshit and just start making video games that are actually good again.

Remember that? Remember when new video games were actually good? I miss those days!

But yeah. Last I checked, having ovaries didn't make it harder for your brain to send signals to your fingers, which is literally the only physical skill required to play video games. Girls should be fucking allowed to play. Period.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
beef_razor said:
I'm usually the first one to jump in and tell people to stop bitching about social issues in video games, since it seems contrived and pointless most of the time, but this is ridiculous. There's no reason women and men shouldn't compete in the same arena in professional video gaming. It's not fucking football (American) or anything where a 350 pound line backer will crush anyone, they're sitting in chairs, with little plastic controllers (or keyboards and mice) tapping buttons looking at a damn screen. Stupid.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with making girl or boy specific competitions. The only problem comes if you give one gender more opportunities than the other. But just because someone "wants" to is enough justification for someone to create such competitions.

The toxic nature of the community towards women alone should allow for the existence of at least some gender distinct competitions. But the "big ones" absolutely shouldn't segregate on gender.

Either way, I think this group had mostly male-only events with just a few female-only. If that was the case then it crosses the line with unfair representation.
 

Neurotic Void Melody

Bound to escape
Legacy
Jul 15, 2013
4,953
6
13
Damn. I got the sexual equality state of mind at at-least 10 years old. This is just depressing...plain and simple. We should be way past this by now, but no. Makes me quite ashamed to be male honestly. But all around me i see sexist behaviour. Seedy guys saying and doing allsorts, claiming to be "cheeky", "joking" or my personal fave "too honest"...just to excuse their sleazy behaviour. I wish i could just go around and hit every single one of those greasy faces!
Anger. Maintained. Err went a little off-topic there. Sorry.
But yes, this e-sports thing is a joke. How far can they push this sexism??
 

Ten Foot Bunny

I'm more of a dishwasher girl
Mar 19, 2014
807
0
0
As questioned many times already in this thread, what's the purpose of segregation in a so-called "sport" that requires no full-body physicality in order to compete? Makes no damn sense.

If they were really concerned about a group of people having an innate advantage or disadvantage in the primary skills required for peak performance, then they should ban/segregate lefties. There's plenty of hard, scientific evidence to support the theory that many lefties enjoy decreased centralization of brain activity across the left and right hemispheres, implying an enhanced ability to take in more (and more varied) information simultaneously, accompanied by increased reaction speeds. Nobody in their right mind could argue that those are less-important in video gaming performance than muscle mass and brute force.

Of course, as a lefty myself, I just love thinking I have /some/ form of advantage. lol

Best not tell the governing bodies about the increased size of the female corpus callosum, though, lest they decide to reinstate their idiotic schemes.
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,242
0
0
Da fuck? I feel like that is the only real response I can give I mean seriously? Why wouldn't they let women play this is stupid as all hell.
 

Bad Jim

New member
Nov 1, 2010
1,763
0
0
Mangue Surfer said:
There is a female chess league because the average women performance in chess is poor. Last time that I check, the only women capable of compete equally with men are Canadians.
You know what this means? If you do, please post it here. I'm curious.
It's means you should check again. By far the best female chess player in the world is Judit Polgár, who is Hungarian.
 

AJ_Lethal

New member
Jun 29, 2014
141
0
0
I can see the dillema in here. If you separate men and women you are kinda enforcing segregation because women will take the "safe space" thing condescending. If you put them together assholes gonna be assholes and shit will get worse before getting better.

We're fucked either way.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Mcoffey said:
Lightknight said:
The toxic nature of the community towards women alone should allow for the existence of at least some gender distinct competitions. But the "big ones" absolutely shouldn't segregate on gender.
That's really only dealing with the symptom of the problem. When we stop tolerating the toxic nature of the community, we stop needing gender separated events.
First off, dealing with the symptoms of the problem is what you do when your core consumer appears to be a community of sexist/bigoted assholes if all these reports on e-sports are to be believed. To get rid of the core of the problem could potentially mean losing your core audience if they really are as bad as people say.

Next, I don't have a problem with a men's competition for the same reason I don't have a problem with a women's book club or a women's competition. There is nothing inherently wrong with this division being made even when skill/performance is equivalent.

As I said originally, the problem comes when there is a disparity between the two events or if there is unequal opportunities for both. For example, if there is only one women's only event but five for men. That's bull unless someone comes up with a magic reason I haven't thought of. But if there are five women's events and five men's events and the prizes are proportionate to the number of participants then who cares?

Now race? That would be a different discussion entirely (distinction implies significant differences. Something you can argue across gender lines but not race).

AJ_Lethal said:
I can see the dillema in here. If you separate men and women you are kinda enforcing segregation because women will take the "safe space" thing condescending. If you put them together assholes gonna be assholes and shit will get worse before getting better.

We're fucked either way.
This is true. Hopefully this will reflect more on their failure to curate a terrible culture rather than anything women have done wrong or their need to be "protected". If the companies doing this understand that this is an action being taken out of failure on their behalf then this is ok as a sandbag wall to stop a flood. But if they think they're solving the problem or doing this because they're good at their jobs then that's silly.
 

Scott Rothman

New member
Feb 2, 2012
162
0
0
Karadalis said:
Ah yes.. traditional asian mysoginy at its best... that happens when you let a organisation from a culture thats still to this day traditionaly sexist run the show on an international level.

Also:

Women only tournaments are okay because... reasons... but male only tournaments are BS (*hinthint* both are BS). Equality much? Either we have limited tournaments or we have free for alls. You cant rip into people for having male only tournaments while at the same time standing there proclaiming that women only tournaments are fine. Makes you look like a hypocrit.
Female only tournaments are totally okay, as they are typically under-represented. Every tournament already is a male only tournament. If we are ever able to level the playing field enough, then I will wholeheartedly agree with you
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,908
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
Jeezus. And I think it's bad enough that real sports are gender-segregated, but at least those have the excuse of not wanting men and women together in the locker rooms. What the fuck is these people's excuse, seriously? No. I don't want to hear it. They're fucking assholes. Every last one of them, without qualification. If any of them object to me calling them a fucking asshole, they have two options: Demand this be changed, or quit. Period. I'm just... I want to hit people with something hard and loud right now.
Actually in real sports genders are segregated because women can't seriously compete with men physically. Taken to the limits of physical development like pro-athletes are, men will always top out higher. This goes for anything from Martial Arts, to Pro-Football. While it was decades ago now, they at one point gave a woman a chance to prove she could compete in Martial Arts against a guy, she was ranked #1 in the women's leagues and they put her up against some dude that was ranked like 20th for men or something like that. A lot of people actually expected her to win, but the dude threw her around like nothing, and even pretty much stood there and gave her a chance to try anything she wanted. The bottom line is, it's not happening. Your not going to see even Rhonda Rousey beat a fairly has-been fighter like Brock Lesner in the Octagon (if he came back) if they decide to really go at it. The size, weight, strength, and yes even speed, are just too different.

When it comes to E-sports it's a touchier subject because it's all mental and fine-reflex based, where it's generally agreed there are no differences between men and women.

The problem as I see it is that it's a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" equasion. When you get down to it men and women think differently, and while there is overlap or even those who think in ways that coorespond heavily to the other gender, the exceptions tend to be fairly rare. Psychologists, Sociologists, and others have gone on about this for decades, and the bottom line is as the book put it "Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus". You even see this in gaming where it seems a lot of the ladies go on about how a lot of these games are giant testosterone-fests and that has nothing to do with who the protagonists are. At the end of the day men tend to be far more aggressive, and directly competitive, as well as do a better job of thinking tactically or strategically when it comes to destroying or overcoming someone or something. The whole thing where men are naturally the warriors and protectors and women are the nurturers and providers so to speak.

The point here is a little different from what you might think, while there are some women who are going to be able to game the same way as guys, that's going to be fairly rare. I honestly don't think women are hitting a real "wall" in E-sports for the most part so much as having limited interest by the numbers when it comes to that level of competition. Indeed all-girl gaming teams like Ubisoft's "Frag Dolls" and the infamous "Team Siren" (actually fairly low ranked) have been around for a while. If you just have one set of competitions a general "league" your probably going to see women poorly represented simply because of the limited interest, combined with the fact that those who are interested are going to be decimated by guys when it comes to most competitions which involve various kinds of combat simulation which the male psyche is better in tune with. As a result a few girls will step up, but you might see long droughts without any on the highest levels, and of course people will scream "sexism" and raise the spectre of political correctness, and of course that same controversy will lead to questions when a girl DOES rise through the ranks, especially if she's highly marketable (attractive or with an appealing personality), leading to allegations of game fixing and so on. Separate leagues mean the girls who do game can get together meaning the limited numbers can gather without anyone being forced out by the competition, and most of the players will be thinking within the same basic guidelines. Of course the top girls in such leagues will probably be more than capable of playing against guys, and that's what exhibition matches and multi-league championships are for. If I was setting up a large E-gaming league I would gender segregate the general competition, but make the finals something each league sent their best people to. Or end things with a final match to crown a grand champion where the men's champion plays the women's champion or whatever else.

I don't expect a lot of agreement here, and maybe even some attacks, but I understand the thought processes involved, and can't say I entirely disagree. In this thread I doubt the points will be popular or acknowleged but I don't think general competitive leagues would have the result people think.

Of course to be fair, this might change if we start seeing games that don't involve simulating some kind of battle (which even Hearthstone does) become popular enough internationally to spawn competition. Some women have a killer instinct, no denying that, but it's a lot more rare than the media would have you believe, and really I think a big part of the behavior during these tournaments and high level play comes from the fact that you have to be really aggressive and have predatory instincts to get that far.... and honestly a lot of the trash talking is designed to get to people (aggressive/predatory behavior), and is all about using anything and everything you can to distract or get a rise out of the other person playing. The very fact that there is complaints about sexist comments and such and demands that they be "off limits" sort of makes the point, if your that easy to hurt or offend, for ANY reason, then your mind is probably not in the right place to be operating at this level. Being able to deal with that crap is part of the talent. Sort of like how in real sports the players go out of their way to try and intimidate each other, your typical scrimmage line isn't exactly a friendly place.

When it comes to competition, to be honest my basic attitude is racism/sexism/bigotry or whatever else only works if the guy on the receiving end has a complex about it to begin with, or is easily offended. When you walk into a competition knowingly, you should kind of expect the other guy to do anything he can to get into your head. If you can't deal, you don't belong there. Of course this does NOT apply to more general play, for example this kind of garbage doesn't belong in your basic MMO or whatever where there isn't any kind of prize or meaningful ranking on the line. Even in a PVP game someone getting like this is an idiot, but if your in an official CoD, LoL, or whatever tournament, expect it.... and let's be honest, the more public you are, the more personally the other guy is going to tailor their attacks.

I'll also be honest in saying that complaints about racism and sexism seem to be generally American phenomena, or directed at white guys who say stuff. For the most part it's ignored in the other direction. You have Japanese players using terms like "Gaijin" (which despite what you might think is derogatory), and of course Chinese call non-Chinese "dogs" (indeed the character for Foreigner and Dog were the same in Chinese writing until fairly recently). I have a hard time when it's such a dual standard and given the heavy Asian participation in a lot of these tournaments. Call an Asian a slur your a bad guy, some Asian calls you a dog and he's just doing his thing.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
Scott Rothman said:
Karadalis said:
Ah yes.. traditional asian mysoginy at its best... that happens when you let a organisation from a culture thats still to this day traditionaly sexist run the show on an international level.

Also:

Women only tournaments are okay because... reasons... but male only tournaments are BS (*hinthint* both are BS). Equality much? Either we have limited tournaments or we have free for alls. You cant rip into people for having male only tournaments while at the same time standing there proclaiming that women only tournaments are fine. Makes you look like a hypocrit.
Female only tournaments are totally okay, as they are typically under-represented. Every tournament already is a male only tournament. If we are ever able to level the playing field enough, then I will wholeheartedly agree with you
Not trying to start an argument, I'm just asking because I don't know if you know something I don't. But are you saying that females don't perform at the same levels as men or just that the gender ratio is so steep that the likelihood of a woman winning is almost null.
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,976
0
0
The best thing IeSF and other organizations can do to legitimize e-sports for everyone is not to tolerate sexism in any space.
Okay... how? No really, how would anyone ever accomplish this? It's impossible to police this. I'm sure IeSF has strict harassment guidelines already.

IeSF might like to inflate its own ego but it's just a handful nerds in a bunch of countries who organize events with support from "HQ" in Korea. They don't have legions of employees and CIA like bugs to implant on every team member, manager, and attendee.

Is it just "Send the message this isn't okay"? Not only do I think that's not enough, because everyone should know it's not okay, they partnered with TAFISA a few months ago that sponsors programs like this.

I also find it incredibly disingenuous to allege that there was widespread support of Bakhtanians in the Pakodzi scandal from the gaming community. Everyone knows about this because it was awful. I don't think I spoke to a single person on the issue who had anything but complete contempt of Bakhtanians.

Note that I want IeSF to do everything it can against harassment, I just don't realistically think all the policy in the world will stop it if it's as absolutely rampant as this article makes it out to be.