The only place I know of where kids cant do that, is the UK :/WelshDanny said:I still don't understand what all the fuss is about. The rest of the worlds games industrys still appear to be going strong despite the fact that kids can't buy 18 rated games.
Can a kid in the states seriously walk into a shop and buy Call of Duty or Grand Theft Auto?
And sell them... where? The US is one of the biggest markets out there, and its the retailers who'd be the ones affected by the law directly, not the developers.theblackmonk90 said:Or more likely they will move to other developed economy's and continue to produce video games with M rating for other countries. I am pretty convinced that if the US abandons the lead it has by hobbling the industry the games industry will simply stop selling those games in the US.
Apparently, no. Its not illegal. Frowned upon by many, yes, illegal, no. That said, alot of shops do enforce the policy of the ESRB ratings but really, its wholly optional.spartandude said:im scepticle that this law will have much affect at all tbh
isnt it already illeagle for under 18s to buy M rated games anyway? and if its not i doubt there are actually that many retailers who are selling them to under 18s, so there wont be a huge drop in sales maybe a minior one but not much at all
and as some people have said, with digital distrobution developers can still sell really well
I got one question for you Sweeney: Say I create a rated M videogame, how the hell can I be held responsible if some dick on the other end of the country sells it to a minor?Patrick Sweeney said:the videogame industry will see big job losses and will make fewer games as retailers stop stocking M rated games for fear of prosecution or litigation.
You missed his (and my) point. Retailers have never had to "adapt" to the law over here. Retailers not stocking M rated games? A load of rubbish. They still make money from it, of course they'll still stock it. I'm pretty ashamed to be a gamer right now, when the gaming "experts" are flinging as much poorly researched and sensationalist bullshit around as the neanderthal super conservative bastards that see games as the root of all evil.Modus Operandi said:Yes, but the UK isn't almost the entire western videogame market, now is it? That's the whole point of the OP -- if the law passes, the retailers will have to adapt. If they adapt by reducing or completely eliminating M-rated game shelves, it will affect everyone in the industry, because USA is where game companies from all over the world look to for their profits.elvor0 said:I live in the Uk, so it being illegal to sell 18 games to under 18s and so on isn't exactly new to me, it all works fine here, and I understand the precedent but, I am in agreement that I can't see all this happening, sure we SHOULD be defending against it, but to be honest all I can see is it ending up like hte UK law, which is perfectly fine, if a movies an 18, you can't buy it, so I'm not quite sure why it should be different, the US have laws on movies and stuff don't they?
And then there is, of course, the USA-specific problem of singling out games as illegal to sell to minors, while movies, music and books are still a legal "free-for-all", effectively establishing legal censorship based on knee-jerk reaction to animal instincts and ignorance (fear of the unknown).
I think you might have misread that section. It's the retailers who will be sued or prosecuted, not the developers.Celtic_Kerr said:I got one question for you Sweeney: Say I create a rated M videogame, how the hell can I be held responsible if some dick on the other end of the country sells it to a minor?Patrick Sweeney said:the videogame industry will see big job losses and will make fewer games as retailers stop stocking M rated games for fear of prosecution or litigation.
Short answer: I CAN'T
The law doens't forbid the sale of Mature games, or the manutacturing of Mature games, it forbids people from selling minors a mature game. THe company who created it can't really be held responsible. Even if some lawyer said "They created an advertisement we think targetted minors!" The only question the judge has to ask is "Okay. WHatever, but even if the minor wanted to buy the game, the store worker should have forbid it.
Right, it would be like selling cigarettes to minors. We don't prosecute convenience stores if they are not selling smokes to minors. If the retailers aren't breaking the law then what's the harm?Danzaivar said:Why would this lead to prosecution/litigation for selling M rated games?
Ineed you are right Sir! But as long as EBGames/Gamestop is careful, they should still do fine. Gas stations around my house card people who look 30 years old as a precaustion against selling cigarettes and tobacco to minros. Just set a rule in place to card someone who appears of a certain age. If gas stations and corner stores can do it, I'm sure a game store can.Logan Westbrook said:I think you might have misread that section. It's the retailers who will be sued or prosecuted, not the developers.Celtic_Kerr said:I got one question for you Sweeney: Say I create a rated M videogame, how the hell can I be held responsible if some dick on the other end of the country sells it to a minor?Patrick Sweeney said:the videogame industry will see big job losses and will make fewer games as retailers stop stocking M rated games for fear of prosecution or litigation.
Short answer: I CAN'T
The law doens't forbid the sale of Mature games, or the manutacturing of Mature games, it forbids people from selling minors a mature game. THe company who created it can't really be held responsible. Even if some lawyer said "They created an advertisement we think targetted minors!" The only question the judge has to ask is "Okay. WHatever, but even if the minor wanted to buy the game, the store worker should have forbid it.
I didnt write collapse as a quotation, i was just emphasising the word considering what some people have been saying makes it sound like a collapse would be inevitable if this law came into effect. I am just saying that it has been blown out of proportion. Why not have a policy whereby the fine is placed on the individual selling the product rather than the retailer? That means that the retailer has no financial worries and merely has to focus on teaching the employee to not sell games to underage children. It took less than 5 minutes for me to be told the repercussions of selling a minor an 18 rated game, and its not exactly hard to ask someone for ID... Other businesses do it all the time, with alcohol and such, why has such a big deal been made of it with video games.Modus Operandi said:First of all, nobody said anything about a "collapse". But it could definitely change and not in favour of high production value M-titles. I personally don't even really care that much, since the big companies haven't put out a single genuinely scary or interesting mature game since Silent Hill 2, but I also don't think that hampering their sales (see below) is the way to go about fixing that.tk1989 said:So basically what you and the original person interviewed believe is that the games industry only really thrives off the sale of games to minors? That if minors are unable to buy M-rated games that whole market will simply 'collapse'?
Second, it's not about selling to minors. It's about retailers having to ask for IDs and having to train and monitor their employees on one more thing, making them reconsider and re-evaluate whether the income from those games justify the administrative overhead AND the possibility of legal punishment if some illegal sales do happen. And the bigger the retail chain, the bigger the overhead and potential fines, therefore the bigger chance that games like Silent Hill will be pushed to some back corner of the shelf, if not dropped completely.
But shops DON'T stop selling cigarettes do they? And you can buy them and alcohol in supermarkets, can't you? This whole thing is rubbish, the effects of it, if it passes, will be minimal.tehroc said:Right, it would be like selling cigarettes to minors. We don't prosecute convenience stores if they are not selling smokes to minors. If the retailers aren't breaking the law then what's the harm?Danzaivar said:Why would this lead to prosecution/litigation for selling M rated games?
Article bring up the movie industry? Well guess what cinema's greatest demographic is teenagers (less options for dates then a non minor) who shouldn't be watching R rated movies without parental guidance. No teen really wants to go to the movies with his parents so of course the industry strives for PG-13 movies to hit the lowest common denominator. R rated movies are still produced for a more sophisticated crowd and are generally more mature (well except Tarentino) and I would expect the same thing in the video game market. M rated games will still be released and offer a more satisfying experience for those with more delicate palates.