Explosions Seen over Gaza in "Saddest Photo Yet" from Space

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Israel agreed a ceasefire via Egypt - Hamas said no. Hamas fired rockets at Israel, they are not victims - just stupid when Israel could crush them anytime they wish. Also Hamas is a terrorist group firing/storing missiles from schools and hospitals putting innocents in danger. In the end its another conflict, like the Shia/Shiites muslims,that will go on forever until one wipes out the other because their issues will never be solved peacefully. And, as usual, its the innocent people on both sides of the conflict that pay with their lives.
 

KaZuYa

New member
Mar 23, 2013
191
0
0
This really isn't the site to discuss this and before my absolute disgust for the Zionist murderers spills out into something uncontrollable this is all political, they are killing Palestinians to win votes because that's what makes you popular.

The killing of children also shows the disregard Israel has for Palestinian lives. The names of Umama Al-Hayyeh, age nine; Dima Isleem, age two; Mohamad Ayyad, age two; Rahaf Abu Jumaa, age four as well more than 130 other children killed are a reminder that every single Palestinian is a possible target for Israel.

The deaths on the Palestinian side is nearing 800 and every innocent son, daughter, mother, sister, brother or father they butcher they will create more and more people who will hate Israel for a lifetime and can you blame them?
 

vallorn

Tunnel Open, Communication Open.
Nov 18, 2009
2,309
1
43
Adam Jensen said:
But according to the western media, it's only sad when Palestinians are doing the bombing.

God, such brainwashing and warmongering.

Cecilo said:
The Israelis could I dunno. Leave the land they have no claim to and are on illegally I suppose. Then no one would be firing weapons at them.
Unfortunately that isn't true. I think Israel should end the occupation, but that wouldn't stop Hamas. They will not rest until they destroy Israel or die trying. Too much bad blood and too little intelligence and enlightenment.
There is no occupation of Gaza Israel pulled out in 2005, to the point where they were dragging settlers from their homes. Hamas responded to the end of the occupation and the removal of settlements with suicide bombings and rocket fire.

Israel have also repeatedly offered the Egyptians back their land (Gaza) which Egypt has refused and the same with the West Bank and Jordan.

And, my apologies, but what media are you watching? Most of the western media seems to be trying to demonize the Israelis.
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
Well that must be a depressing thing to watch from space :/

LysanderNemoinis said:
Israel's military doesn't want to hurt civilians, they're not chomping at the bit to kill people.
The UN Goldstone report into Operation Cast Lead, a 2008/2009 attack on Gaza , begs to differ.

Also don't understand why you're asking the entire world to have sympathy for the side currently doing the most fucked up shit, I kinda have more sympathy for the Palestinians. Seriously at the very least you should know about the israeli warship that fired on those kids on the beach (btw, the rest of those kids family got killed recently in an airstrike if a poster in another thread is to believe..), unless you're saying they were aiming for hamas members sunbathing on the beach next to them then there is no defending that BS with even that flimsy pretence that israeli forces only aim for suspected hamas sites (a claim which un reports found to be untrue, just wanna emphasize that again).

vallorn said:
And, my apologies, but what media are you watching? Most of the western media seems to be trying to demonize the Israelis.
They don't have to try really hard though given what's going on. I honestly don't understand how you people can hear of Israels actions and and still think they have some sort of moral high ground in this situation.
 

AstaresPanda

New member
Nov 5, 2009
441
0
0
Its a chunk of land ppl have been fighting over for ages due to its holy ness ness. Youd think they would not want to damage any of the land. But anyway google Palestine. Its does not even show up on the map anymore. The fact that their country is split in half.....barely any offical Palestine land left. You really think they are going to sit back and take it ? No one would. Not taking sides but who has an ARMY outside Gaza's doorstep ? and what does Gaza really have ? The Media over here in England anyway paints Isreal as the victims and have lost so much. And maybe 2 mins of the ppl of Gaza.
 

TheEvilCheese

Cheesey.
Dec 16, 2008
1,151
0
0
I don't want to get too political- but the thread is bound to be. No point throwing my opinions into the mix or trying to persuade others (enough smashing my face into a brick wall recently).

I just want to say that the idea that human conflict is this ordinary and mundane is pretty disgusting when you think about it.
 

OldNewNewOld

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,494
0
0
Isn't it ironic that Israelis are now the nazis?
Well either way what they are doing is inhuman and should be sanctioned by the UN or whoever has the authority to do so. But lets be real, it won't happen since the big brother will approve of their action.
There is a fine difference between defense and mass murder of civilians. Latest news reports state that there are 750 civilian deaths and 17 Israeli military deaths. You can hardly call that self defense. Attempted genocide would fit better to describe this situation.
 

Baresark

New member
Dec 19, 2010
3,908
0
0
Fun fact: Both sides have a majority that think the "two state" system is for the best, but both shitty governments like to keep shooting at each other.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
Adam Jensen said:
Unfortunately that isn't true. I think Israel should end the occupation, but that wouldn't stop Hamas. They will not rest until they destroy Israel or die trying. Too much bad blood and too little intelligence and enlightenment.
After Israel signed the ceasefire agreement back in Nov 2012, there was no rocketfire from Hamas for 3 months, and they even even tried to stop rocket fires from smaller factions. This conflict resumed only after Israel broke the terms of ceasefire. Of the <url=http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2012/12/israeli-ceasefire-violations-in-gaza.html>120 Israeli ceasefire violations during that period, all we got from the mainstream media was the number of rockets from Gaza. Here's a graph of Israeli vs Hamas ceasefire violations.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F07y-Gax1XA/UvKDpEwhwZI/AAAAAAAAFVY/vS6xmEK44Zg/s1600/Gaza+Dynamics.png

source: http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2014/02/israelgaza-cease-fire-dynamics-breakdown.html



LysanderNemoinis said:
Israel's military doesn't want to hurt civilians, they're not chomping at the bit to kill people.
IDF killed 4 kids on the beach playing football (such an amazing threat), 4 hospitals hit (IDF even admitted that they knew there were no weapons stored in the Al Wafa hospital), along with targeting a UNRWA schools that held over 300 Internally Displaced People (no weapons) and red crescent ambulances trying to retrieve the dead being hit, <url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBakqLUBWP0&bpctr=1406264066>sniping at municipal workers trying to retrieve the wounded...

For fuck's sake, these were the people who were dropping white phosphorus on civilian populations back in 2009.
 

GabeZhul

New member
Mar 8, 2012
699
0
0
Craig Rigby said:
muslims have way less claim to Israel and those territories, having invaded some time after mohammed died. the Jews have been that the 3000 years and there is historical evidence to prove that.
Okay, I have to stop you right there because that is a horrible argument. There is no square feet on this planet that haven't changed owner at least five times during human history. I always considered the formation of Israel to be a very dangerous precedent, as it could potentially be used to flare up all the other land claims based on "historical ownership" (and AFAIK, it already does so).

What's next? Let the Turkish have back all the Mid-Eastern European countries? But then what if Hungary shows up and demands them instead because they were there first? And then the Italians, because the Romans were there even before that?! And then the French identifying as Celts because they were there even before that?!

Once you starts playing the "historical ownership" game, everyone loses...
 

FogHornG36

New member
Jan 29, 2011
649
0
0
There are no civilians in a country that votes in terrorists, and then shelters said terrorists from counter attacks.
 

maxben

New member
Jun 9, 2010
529
0
0
RA92 said:
Adam Jensen said:
Unfortunately that isn't true. I think Israel should end the occupation, but that wouldn't stop Hamas. They will not rest until they destroy Israel or die trying. Too much bad blood and too little intelligence and enlightenment.
After Israel signed the ceasefire agreement back in Nov 2012, there was no rocketfire from Hamas for 3 months, and they even even tried to stop rocket fires from smaller factions. This conflict resumed only after Israel broke the terms of ceasefire. Of the <url=http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2012/12/israeli-ceasefire-violations-in-gaza.html>120 Israeli ceasefire violations during that period, all we got from the mainstream media was the number of rockets from Gaza. Here's a graph of Israeli vs Hamas ceasefire violations.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F07y-Gax1XA/UvKDpEwhwZI/AAAAAAAAFVY/vS6xmEK44Zg/s1600/Gaza+Dynamics.png

source: http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2014/02/israelgaza-cease-fire-dynamics-breakdown.html



LysanderNemoinis said:
Israel's military doesn't want to hurt civilians, they're not chomping at the bit to kill people.
IDF killed 4 kids on the beach playing football (such an amazing threat), 4 hospitals hit (IDF even admitted that they knew there were no weapons stored in the Al Wafa hospital), along with targeting a UNRWA schools that held over 300 Internally Displaced People (no weapons) and red crescent ambulances trying to retrieve the dead being hit, <url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBakqLUBWP0&bpctr=1406264066>sniping at municipal workers trying to retrieve the wounded...

For fuck's sake, these were the people who were dropping white phosphorus on civilian populations back in 2009.
Everything you've linked is a lie. You're using a source that says that CNN is Israeli State TV and a youtube video that is so fake its ridiculous. Its just like the Palestinians and their supporters, fake videos, fake images, fake graphs. Do you remember when you guys photoshopped Beirut during the Second Lebanon War? And used photos from Syria claiming they are Gaza? Or claimed that every Hamas death is a civilian death? Everyone wants to believe their lies because they feel sorry for them (which I understand as its a reasonable response).

FogHornG36 said:
There are no civilians in a country that votes in terrorists, and then shelters said terrorists from counter attacks.
Careful with that argument, the Arabs say that there are no Israeli civilians because all Israeli civilians are technically soldiers. Once you start dehumanizing people for "legitimate' arguments you go down a very bad spiral.
 

NoeL

New member
May 14, 2011
841
0
0
I hope the pro-Israels in this thread respond to the people offering counter-evidence. I'd like to hear more points of view, and if they can respond at all. At the moment it seems both sides are fucked but Israel has the bigger guns (and hence commits more atrocities). I'm not convinced that if Hamas had the upper hand we wouldn't be seeing the same numbers - if not higher - of civilian casualties on Israel's side.
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
BiH-Kira said:
Isn't it ironic that Israelis are now the nazis?
Well either way what they are doing is inhuman and should be sanctioned by the UN or whoever has the authority to do so. But lets be real, it won't happen since the big brother will approve of their action.
There is a fine difference between defense and mass murder of civilians. Latest news reports state that there are 750 civilian deaths and 17 Israeli military deaths. You can hardly call that self defense. Attempted genocide would fit better to describe this situation.
Attempted genocide is hardly an apt description. If Israel wanted to commit genocide, they could easily do it. The fact that they go out of their way to minimize civilian casualties, either by warning shots, flyers, phone calls and messages, whathaveyou, kind of goes against the definition of genocide.

We could argue whether Israel's response is appropriate or not, I happen to believe that it is at least to a modest extent understandable and reasonable, but this does not change that Hamas purposefully centers themselves in civilian centers to act as human shields to purposefully exacerbate any civilian casualties. Hamas would report them as civilian, Israel would report them as terrorist. It's a messy situation.

Cecilo said:
Even if you want to try to blame it all on people hating the jewish people. At the moment they actually have a reason to hate the Jewish people. They are illegally ON THEIR LAND. The Gaza strip does not belong to Israel as determined by the United Nations and a previously signed pact.
Pretty sure Israel de-occupied the area in 2005, though there could be an argument for lingering influence I suppose.

If the Hamas still attack the people of Israel after that they lose their sympathy from me. But right now ya know, They have a legitimate reason to attack and hate Israel. They are occupying their homes and settling their land.
I would like to think there's no sane reason to deliberately attack innocent civilians (key word: deliberately).

RA92 said:
After Israel signed the ceasefire agreement back in Nov 2012, there was no rocketfire from Hamas for 3 months, and they even even tried to stop rocket fires from smaller factions. This conflict resumed only after Israel broke the terms of ceasefire. Of the <url=http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2012/12/israeli-ceasefire-violations-in-gaza.html>120 Israeli ceasefire violations during that period, all we got from the mainstream media was the number of rockets from Gaza. Here's a graph of Israeli vs Hamas ceasefire violations.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F07y-Gax1XA/UvKDpEwhwZI/AAAAAAAAFVY/vS6xmEK44Zg/s1600/Gaza+Dynamics.png

source: http://blog.thejerusalemfund.org/2014/02/israelgaza-cease-fire-dynamics-breakdown.html
That graph and source seem incredibly, incredibly biased. I would imagine Hamas rocket fires would count as violations, though the graph clearly intends to stack it on one person over another.

Grouchy Imp said:
They could stop firing on UN-run shelters for a start...

<a href=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-28468526>BBC News link

Both sides are guilty of killing civilians, and you saying that one side deserves our moral support whilst they continue to be as bad as the people they fight is just wrong.
Hamas uses the UN schools as rocket depots and firing centers. Video is fine [http://therightscoop.com/israeli-ambassador-reams-out-cnn-for-not-reporting-un-statement-that-says-hamas-makes-un-schools-a-target/], don't want to cite the entire website for potential bias.

A major difference is the fact that Hamas deliberately target civilian centers, whilst Israel actively tries to minimize civilian casualties. Arguments could be made for the effectivness, and perhaps maybe true intent, of these attempts, but there is a distinct difference between the two sides regarding civilians.

Baresark said:
Fun fact: Both sides have a majority that think the "two state" system is for the best, but both shitty governments like to keep shooting at each other.
I really hope that's true. For all our sake's.

Look, I've been entrenched in this shenanigans for a while. I have family in the area, and I won't say where because I feel it is irrelevant. Family is family, and people are people.

Israel is stuck in a messy situation. I don't think it is unreasonable for them to want to stop the rocket fire. I'd imagine most nations would prefer rockets to stop being fired at them, especially rockets specifically targeted towards their civilians.

I'm reminded of a scenario, can't remember if it's apocryphal or if I was asked this directly. "What would you do if were a soldier and you saw a child suicide bomber running right at you?" You shoot the kid and save yourself and your squadmates, they use his death as a tool. You don't, you die. I guess what I'm trying to say is, I don't envy Israel in this position. (I will note, when googling "Children Suicide Bombers" the first link was this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_suicide_bombers_in_the_Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict]. I find that depressing)

On the topic of this picture, I dislike it because it implies that the whole image is full of bombs and destruction. In actuality it's just the lights to the cities of the area. And whatever bombs you might be able to see, they are small and barely noticeable.
 

nevarran

New member
Apr 6, 2010
347
0
0
Useless war if there has ever been one.
They're just breeding terrorists. Every death is another reason for someone to snap and go blow himself in a bus or something.

And I can't believe the world is just sitting by and doing nothing.
 

Exterminas

New member
Sep 22, 2009
1,130
0
0
I believe something that should be realized for the type of discussion going on in this thread:

It's entirely possible for both parties in a conflict to be bad guys that do horrible things. You don't have to pick one party.

Personally, I think both the Hamas and Israel are acting despicable.
 
Mar 30, 2010
3,785
0
0
Jumplion said:
Grouchy Imp said:
They could stop firing on UN-run shelters for a start...

<a href=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-28468526>BBC News link

Both sides are guilty of killing civilians, and you saying that one side deserves our moral support whilst they continue to be as bad as the people they fight is just wrong.
Hamas uses the UN schools as rocket depots and firing centers. Video is fine [http://therightscoop.com/israeli-ambassador-reams-out-cnn-for-not-reporting-un-statement-that-says-hamas-makes-un-schools-a-target/], don't want to cite the entire website for potential bias.

A major difference is the fact that Hamas deliberately target civilian centers, whilst Israel actively tries to minimize civilian casualties. Arguments could be made for the effectivness, and perhaps maybe true intent, of these attempts, but there is a distinct difference between the two sides regarding civilians.
Oh don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to excuse Hamas' tactics in any way here, as you say they use human shields and launch missiles indiscriminately into Isreali territory - but there is a big difference between the Isrealis targeting a military target that regretfully contains hostages and them targeting UN refugee shelters. And although I am fully aware that tragic accidents can happen, according to the news article I cited that is the forth UN refugee centre to be hit in four days. That goes beyond unfortunate coincidence I'm afraid.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
LysanderNemoinis said:
Israel's military doesn't want to hurt civilians, they're not chomping at the bit to kill people. They're trying to defend themselves against an enemy that knows that a lot of people (including the vast majority who will comment on this story) will buy their propaganda and claim moral equivalency or just shrug and move on, when we should all be supporting Israel at least with moral support so they actually feel like the entire world doesn't hate them.
Working with the UN would maybe help in the "not hurting civilians" bit. from the Independent:

"The targeting policy of the Israeli military was once again under scrutiny later in the day when a UN school in the town of Beit Hanoun, which was being used as a shelter by hundreds fleeing the fighting, was hit by tank shells killing 15 people, including children, and leaving 70 injured.

Chris Gunness, spokesperson for the UN Relief and Works Agency, pointed out that "precise co-ordinates of the shelter had been formally given to the Israeli army. Over the course of the day, the agency tried to co-ordinate a window for civilians to leave with the Israeli army: it was never granted."


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...l-of-refugees-and-a-doctors-home-9627173.html

Its not proof you "hate" a nation because you disagree with their policies that go against UN madate and result in the deaths of hundreds of civilians.

Craig Rigby said:
And, my apologies, but what media are you watching? Most of the western media seems to be trying to demonize the Israelis.
Reporting 600 deaths with so many being women and children is demonising? I guess some news is tough to put a positive spin on. I always found western media to be quite sympathetic towards the Israelis, less so to them bulldozing civilian homes and bombing hospitals though.

It was Nietzsche who said "Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.".

I hoped that when Hamas and Fatah were coming to an agreement we may see moderate voices gaining ground but thats when Israel walked away from the negotiations.
 

Lovely Mixture

New member
Jul 12, 2011
1,474
0
0
bjj hero said:
I hoped that when Hamas and Fatah were coming to an agreement we may see moderate voices gaining ground but thats when Israel walked away from the negotiations.
In Hamas's charter their goal is the destruction of Israel. Two months ago, a Hamas chairman said that they would not recognize Israel.

I do think that Israel should try to negotiate with them anyway, but unless Hamas changes their tune, Israel is going to see any negotiations as biding time for the next intifada.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
Lovely Mixture said:
bjj hero said:
I hoped that when Hamas and Fatah were coming to an agreement we may see moderate voices gaining ground but thats when Israel walked away from the negotiations.
In Hamas's charter their goal is the destruction of Israel. Two months ago, a Hamas chairman said that they would not recognize Israel.

I do think that Israel should try to negotiate with them anyway, but unless Hamas changes their tune, Israel is going to see any negotiations as biding time for the next intifada.
Fatah want negotiations and hamas was losing support, hence their truce and shared government. This will not be finished with bombs. If it could be Israel haa the fire power to do so. It will be talk and policy. I hope hamas will continue to lose support despite current events As theyre not a standard army that can be bested on the battlefield.

To draw a parallel; Northern Ireland is unrecognisable from the NI of 30years ago. The soldiers didnt do that, it was the talking.