I think that, as you rightly say, neither side wishes to be attacked - but this also leads to a situation where neither side wishes to be the last to be attacked; the Israelis need to be seen to retaliate against the latest Hamas attack and vice-versa. This leads directly on to the current situation where Israel feels justified in violating the current cease-fire simply because Hamas violated the last one.Jumplion said:Because, again, Hamas deliberately hides themselves in civilian hubs to maximize civilian casualties. This is so they can use the numbers to their favor. Of course you will get those large numbers, regardless of how precise the tactics are. That's the strategy. Whether or not Israel's response is appropriate, I am not at liberty to say.Grouchy Imp said:The Israeli military has access to state-of-the-art tech and are more than capable of acquiring and verifying targets remotely before launching strikes, so in theory these kind of civilian casualties should be being kept to a minimum, however since the recent hostilities began nearly 1,000 Palestinians have been killed and nearly 6,000 wounded. How many casualties have the Isrealis suffered? Less than 40. The Isreali response has been vastly disproportionate to the level of attacks they have suffered.
I also previously mentioned in another comment why the argument of "proportionality" doesn't quite work in this situation. The only way it would be "proportional" is if more civilians were killed on the Israeli side, or if Hamas would stop centralizing themselves in civilian populations. Unless you are suggesting that Israeli civilian deaths would be okay, which I am fairly sure you're not, the best course of action would be to stop the ouroboros that both sides perpetuate. How do you do that, I'm not sure.
I don't blame them for wanting to stop it, one way or another. I'd imagine most developed nations would prefer rockets to not be fired onto them. But again, whether or not the response is appropriate, I don't know and I won't pretend to know.
This is after Israel agreed to a cease-fire a few days earlier and Hamas continued to fire rockets during said cease-fire. They have also recently agreed to extend the cease-fire [http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-28507951], though Hamas still intends to fire rockets from what I can tell.A really depressing example of what I mean is that even though a 12 hour cease-fire has been agreed by the two sides, the Isreali military has said that it will still "locate and neutralize" Hamas forces. <a href=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28497439>During the cease-fire for crying out loud.
At the end of the day it's a thoroughly shitty situation with no easy solution (just look at how long it took us and Ireland to end 'The Troubles'), but as I've said Israel will not gain international support by sinking to Hamas' level.
EDIT - And for the record, although I am sickened by fact that twenty (+) Palistinian lives have been taken for each Israeli life in this current conflict, I view any Palistinian attempt to in some sick way 'redress the balance' as abhorrent. The last thing this whole sad affair needs is more casualties.