SuperSuperSuperGuy said:
I, for one, welcome our new Facebook overlords.
That aside, I generally hate April Fool's day, but I actually quite liked this little joke. It's nice and topical, if a little... Well, I don't want to say unoriginal, but there've been a lot of jokes like this today.
In fairness, I doubt they sat around looking at what other people wrote.
bdcjacko said:
I would have believed it more if the escapist was bought by Facebook for $90.
Naw jk, you would totally get bought for 100 even.
Don't be insulting. They're easily worth twice that.
Gorrath said:
Good one, Escapist staff! You had up until "the Rolling Stone" of game journalism and I nearly spit my tea all over the monitor. My monocle did pop though. Good show!
Maybe it's just because I'm like 60 years older than the average user here, but I went the other way. I associate Rolling Stone with its period of decline into irrelevance and thought "Oh, come on, they're not THAT bad!"
I guess the mag is somewhat relevant these days, but I never picked it back up and still think of it in those terms.
Grenge Di Origin said:
1. Don't make it blatantly obvious
2. Make it actually sound like it's likely to happen
3. Don't have it coincide with events that only happened less than 2 weeks ago
I thought 3 was what made it enjoyable.
Also, I don't think 1 applies. It's April Fools. Pretty much anything is blatant. And likely is relative due to the recent news.
Brian Tams said:
April Fools jokes are only good if you're going to fully commit to them, esccapist.
Come on! Where are the intrusive adds, the popups, the autoplaying... ads... the... uh... ummmmmm.... shoddy videoplayer?
Well, this is awkward.
EDIT: Hey, at least you don't require us to sign in exclusively through our facebook accounts yet. Yet.
They were also conspicuously missing homophobic slurs and death threats.