Um, that was never their excuse "Sony was going to charge us to host it on the PSN". I don't even know where you got that excuse aside from trying to fit together an entirely different topic in this.AceDiamond said:Their explanation was, more or less, that "Sony was going to charge us to host it on the PSN"CountFenring said:Cool, was it just me or did Bethesda once say the DLC couldn't be on the PS3 for some reason?
Course that may have been unofficial. Todd Howard had this to say to IGN regarding the announcement that PS3 users couldshut their whiny self-serving pieholesrejoice in getting DLC:
Todd Howard: It's mostly the workload on us. Based on our Oblivion experience, it was clear that Xbox users were much more comfortable buying content, by a wide margin. It's a lot of work to get them ready for a particular platform and now that they've been so popular, we want to get them on the PS3. And there's obviously been a lot of frustration on the part of PS3 owners, who don't feel they are getting the total Fallout 3 experience, and we don't want that to happen. We want everyone to have everything, but we still need to set priorities so we can use our development time wisely.
Basically, Bethesda said repeatedly "DLC won't be coming to PS3" simple as that.