digital warrior said:
I don't know bout most people, but when I'd take fallout 3 over oblivion, or Fallout NV over Skyrim any day(note not calling them bad games just found fallout games better). Even fallout 3 had more places to use speech or roll play than Skyrim or Oblivion ever did, and Fallout NV was better in every way to its predecessor(last steam count had it roughly 350 hours). I really don't want this to be a hoax, need me some more fallout goodness.
They were made by two different developers, Fallout 3 was made by Bethesda and Fallout: New Vegas was made by Obsidian Entertainment. Obsidian Entertainment is a reformation of the head developers that made up Black Isle Studios the developer that made Fallout 1&2. I think that's really the reason why New Vegas was so much better than Fallout 3, it was made by the people who thought up the universe in the first place. Fallout 3 is a really great game on it's own, but it's really stiff as a Fallout game, Bethesda tried really hard to infuse it with some kind of sappy, messiah driven hope complex. This is antithetical to the tone of Fallout. The nuclear apocalypse that causes this environment also shadows the whole wasteland with cynicism, it's post hope, the worst possible failure of humankind hangs over it, which is why it's balanced with pitch black humor. Fallout 3 just doesn't match that, they try with three dog telling stories of hope and with an old woman with a violin and some guy dressed up as a bee, but it just doesn't cut it, it comes off as tragic and sad, and that just makes the game environment seem so much more empty.
Sort of got off point there.
The point is that if Fallout 4 is developed by Bethesda my expectations are going to be lower than if it's developed by Obsidian. Why? Because Obsidian has developed three Fallout games and Bethesda has developed one. If they learn from New Vegas, awesome, if they make it about family relationships and hope and fuzzy feelings, I'm going to be annoyed.