RealRT said:
novem said:
RealRT said:
New Frontiersman said:
RealRT said:
Since when is being exclusive to Wii U a good thing?
Since people who have owned Wii U's have wanted to play games on them.
I'm looking forward to this, I don't usually play survival horror, but this looks interesting! Plus more games to play on my Wii U is always good!
Newsflash: games can be released on multiple platforms and people who don't own a Wii U not being able to play it is NOT a good thing... then again, Wii U and multiplats are like two parallel lines.
Exclusives might be bad for your wallet but they are very good for the industry; they drive competition and encourage innovation.
Also, the WiiU has the potential to offer unique gameplay experiences that are not possible with the other consoles and won?t be possible if all the system gets is ports. So far, very few games on the system have fully embraced this uniqueness but the ones that have are incredibly compelling.
Excuse me for going to care more about my wallet than about Nintendo's position in competition.
People say PS4 and XBone are underpowered to carry on an entire generation, what does this say about Wii U then? And uniqueness is good and all, but necessity is mother of all inventions. All the good ones anyway.
You should want ALL of the companies to be competitive. I don?t much care for the Xbox lineup but that doesn?t mean I want the system to fail, that would be bad for all of the consoles. With no direct competition there would be little reason for Sony to try and produce better games or better user experiences.
You can play the underpowered card and you wouldn?t be wrong, but that has rarely prevented a system from doing well. Your own quote works well here, necessity is the mother of all invention, so let?s see what can be made when a company throws its all behind gameplay and innovation instead of concentrating on graphics.