Long answer: It's EA so it's entirely plausible.Houseman said:Do you actually believe that Battlefield made that dog scene in RESPONSE to CoD:Ghosts?SKBPinkie said:Ugh...
This is precisely what puts me off the Battlefield series. And it's not just the producers / designers, it's also the fans. If you're trying to sell me a product, stop constantly comparing yourself to everything else and just tell me what's good about it. I'm perfectly capable of making the comparisons myself; don't treat me like a fucking idiot.
Reminds me of the whole "I'm a Mac" campaign. It just comes off as insecure and douchey to me.
Short answer: Yes.
So we can make a movie featuring a psychotic toddler killing people, but we can't make a game featuring psychotic baby? (smh)Therumancer said:Oh I don't know, I think the protagonist of the original Silent Hill game might disagree with that.canadamus_prime said:Silly EA, everyone knows babies don't use knives. They use blades hidden in their rattles.
One of the reasons why I was so reluctant to ever play Silent Hill 2 (though I did buy a used copy if it for $5 many, many years later) was that the game was edited to remove the evil baby monsters due to complaints over the demo released for it. I try not to support games or companies that bow to censorship. I still maintain for that reason alone Silent Hill 2 does not deserve the praise or recognition it receives... but this is a total side point. Today very few people seem to ever remember the killer kiddies from Silent Hill, when they were arguably the most freaky thing in the original rogues gallery.