Nazulu said:
...and what did you think the writer was going for when Neo decided to save Trinity instead?
I don't know if it necessarily symbolizes anything. It could be simply "guy loves girl, true love prevails" (in that he saves Trinity, and that in doing so, paves the way to bring about an end to the war rather than letting the cycle perpetuate itself. That said, I can see a number of interpretations for that scene:
1) Neo prevails because he chooses to go against the cycle. "The problem is choice," as he says, but in the end, choice carries the day (standing in contrast to the Merovingian's ideology). He chooses to save Trinity, and the new version of the Matrix that ends up being created allows red pills to choose to leave.
2) Neo stands as testament to the self-interest of human beings. Instead of guaranteeing the survival of mankind, he chooses to save one person, despite the Architect's assurances that this will result in the extinction of humanity through Zion being destroyed, and the Matrix having a system crash. Even as he saves her, there's no doubt that he's killing blue pills along the way (e.g. the cars caught up in the wind funnel his speed creates). Even while he saves Trinity, he's done so on a whim, with no plan beyond that. Human beings are selfish creatures, and that can result in great deeds, but also terrible acts.
I'm more akin to side with the first interpretation, because red pills generally seem to be blase about innocents dying in the Matrix. Morpheus does lay it out in the first film after all (the "Matrix is a system" scene), where he basically says that if Neo isn't "one of us, then you're one of them (blue pills)."