1,2,5 and 6 are also on PSN. 4 might be too but I'm not entirely sure.Arontala said:You can easily start with the first one and work your way up, seeing as how 1-6 have all been remade for the GBA/DS/PSP, and you can get seven, eight, and nine off of the PSN store.
There is no chronology with the Final Fantasy games. No, 1 is not the best, not even close. Start with XIII, it more modern and has a fast paced battle system. It's not the best either but it's better than FF1. If you don't like that, try 7,8,9 or 10. The latter is the most linear but has a decent story and classic turn based battle.Ninjafire72 said:Is FF1 the best game in the franchise though? I don't really mind screwing up the chronology or anything, I just want to see what the series has to offer. If I like the first one I play, then it'll probably entice me to go back to the first one and work my way through.
Such as?Tiswas said:I enjoyed 6 and 9. 10 was okish too.Tactics line is great tho.
4 and 5 were average. The rest I didn't really care much for.
Never really see why people give the series such a great deal. I found a lot of JRPGs to be far superior to it.
This sounds like the best way to go. You could probably add 6 and 12, but their appeal is different than Tactics (which is a fantastic and well-written game) and 4 (which is pretty much the genesis of most Final Fantsy "mythology" such as it is). Final Fantasy 6 (along with Chrono Trigger) are possibly the best games Square produced for Super Nintendo and are well worth the time to play, and 12 is about 3/4 of a solid game that you may enjoy since you don't have the knee-jerk prejudice that a lot of Final Fantasy fans seem to have regarding it.Clive Howlitzer said:Final Fantasy Tactics or Final Fantasy IV. They are the main ones worth playing in my opinion. All others are optional.
What why would we do that? I mean...Ninjafire72 said:So please don't burn me at the stake or anythiny...
That's VI, but in America, it's original release title was III. This is because the Japanese II, III, and V were never released over here, so IV and VI became II and III to compensate and try to ease confusion about missing numbers. Here's a chart that makes it easy to understand visually.Mcoffey said:I have recently started playing FFVI for the first time (Or is it III? The one with Kefka and the Espers?)