quit while you're behind, all your doing is being annoying and preachy. believe me, the "starving africans" is a horse that's been beaten to a subatomic quark-matter. people want to complain, you BAWing about "BUT LE AFRIKANS ARE LE STAAVIN'" will change three things, maybe four.SimpleThunda said:Read my post.Master of the Skies said:And here we have you admitting to using them as a 'mirror'.SimpleThunda said:I'm not "using" poor starving kids for anything. I'm putting a mirror infront of you to help you see how you're whining about something that is a luxury. If you can't see the sense in that I suppose it goes to show just how spoiled people have become, if this thread isn't already a showcase for that.Master of the Skies said:Yes, because by giving up our choice in what we have to eat that will totally help them. Sacrifice our choice and the gods will look down kindly upon those starving children. It's not as if being able to be a bit picky somehow makes those kids starve.SimpleThunda said:An entire topic dedicated to people whining about what they don't like to eat while there's an army of kids in Africa starving to death.
Let that sink in for a second.
If you don't like a topic, could you try not to use poor starving kids like that? It's not like you're making any suggestion to help them so it's hardly on their behalf.
There is no sense in what you're doing because the pointless complaints aren't accomplishing anything. It in and of itself is a pointless complaint. Yes, people have a luxury. That does not mean they have to use the luxury as you direct, they have the luxury to choose what they want to eat. What are you trying to do, shame them into not choosing what they eat when it doesn't matter to the poor kids you're trying to use as some kind of point in your crusade?
Where exactly did I encourage people not to use the luxury they have been given?
You accuse me of complaining, whereas I haven't complained at all. The only people that are complaining are the people in this topic which are listing all the things that they do not want to eat.
I'm encouraging people to take a step back and look at what it is they're whining about and putting it in perspective.
I've given you an image, which you cannot deny is true, and faced with your own ignorance you get mad and accuse me of things.
1. nothing
2. nothing
3. nothing
4. also, nothing.
do you get the idea that throwing the forum equivelant of a temper tantrum because you disagree with the subject matter is discouraged, now?