Deadman Walkin said:
I am curious to how many people share my viewpoint on this. When you watch the professional cooking shows (such as Iron Chef and so on) and they make the tiny little dishes, does that small amount of food actually fill you? I have never tried it so I cannot tell from experience, but compared to something that you would cook at home (stirfrys, pasta, etc) it just seems like...no food!
As a mostly professional chef (years of experience, but still don't have that "crucial piece of paper" to make it official), I can tell you that there are pretty much two schools of thought on the matter:
1.) There's the poncy bastards on Hell's Kitchen and Top Chef and what-have-you that want to be famous, and
2.) There's people like me who will NEVER achieve
any kind of notoriety but still can cook you a meal that could make your eyes water with joy and your heart swell with contentment, and that makes us happy because somebody REAL enjoys our food.
Honestly, food critics and a goodly amount of famous chefs are dickheads and cock-holes (actually, that's not true, ALL accomplished chefs are dickheads and cock-holes), they're the modern art critics of the new millennium, and they're just as pretentious and twice as useless.
Let me put it to you this way, would you rather have a watermelon consume (that's cold watermelon soup for the uninitiated) made by Wolfgang Puck, or a cream based bow-tie pasta dish with minced red onions, fresh sauteed garlic, chopped bacon, fresh basil and a host of other tasty ingredients made by me?
Main bullet point of the presentation:
Don't buy the hype. I worked with a chef who once prepared a dish with sea lamprey. Who the fuck wants to eat that?