Amnestic post=18.71114.715657 said:
If by "your" you're referring to Khell as opposed to me, then you'd be right.
Person A makes statement a.
Person B defends the validity of statement a against arguement b.
Therefore, Person B makes the claim of a's validity against those aspects criticized in b
If b is the claim entirely, then a is b.
The defense is of a, as a=b
A is claimed to be valid in completeness
Thus, you too made the claim.
As for a "majority", that was used to validate the dismissal of "all" (note the point that this originally derives from is "rap" -no divisional word- is in need of removal), and thus is utilized in a manner to indicate a sufficient quantity to indicate the entirety. Thus, "all".
Amnestic post=18.71114.715657 said:
Would you care to explain the symbolism in the lyrics by the way?
Ahh, because vulgarity negates art. I'm sorry.
We need to ring up Shakespeare quick!