Yes. And, more importantly, it will give him a character so that he won't be able to play any other Marvel character. Now, if only they chould also restrict his work with DC characters... retroactively...COMaestro said:If they can stick with the feel of the proof of concept video and manage to make an appealing story, Fox might have a hit on their hands with this. I do hope they keep Ryan Reynolds, as I feel he fits the character of Deadpool quite well.
I give it a 50/50 that they do an R-rated movie. If the studio is willing to target more the college-age male audience that make up the bulk of sales for ultraviolent horror movies (Saw, Hostel, Evil Dead, etc.), "adult" comedies (Hangover, Horrible Bosses, and your standard stoner fare), and action specticle movies (300, Sin City), then they will probably greenlight a raunchy, ultraviolent r-rated funny gorefest. And with Deadpool, you start with jumping the shark and get crazier from there.SonOfVoorhees said:WOuld love an R rated version of Deadpool. Only thing is, depending on cost, it may be PG13. It is a hard movie to sell to people who dont know the character....i can only imagine what they will think of the crazy trailers.
First iterations of characters are almost unrecognizable outside of the most culturally recognizable characters. Hell, a good chunk of retcons are made just to explain those changes.SeeDarkly_Xero said:Wait...is that right?MovieBob said:Created in 1993 by Rob Liefeld as a villain for the New Mutants...
goes and checks Marvel Wikia
It is. #98.
I guess that means I own the first appearance of Deadpool...
Huh. How about that.
O_O