tl;dr anti-Fox dribble.
I decided to give Escapist the benefit of the doubt on the subject. I had a feeling they would be anti-Fox the moment I saw the title but I do know that often the more elder of the correspondents have been a bit uneducated on the subject (See O'Reilly on Mass Effect but don't change the subject). So, I'll watch the video and comment on each thing I hear.
0:20; One part of the Sim City games is that you are fined if your city isn't 'eco-friendly'. Now, in the real world there are fines for being anti-eco. That is polluting. But I can't find laws stating that a city has to be eco-friendly (Planting trees and enacting clean air ordinances and car emissions ordinances.) That's called a nudge and I don't like that.
1:00; The game apparently pushes planting soy farms and alternative energy sources as apposed to Nuclear plants. I'm sure it doesn't explain that not all people like soy and that alternative energy sources at the moment are not as efficient in land and materials needed compared to Nuclear plants. At least James Lovelock believes so. http://discovermagazine.com/2008/may/02-is-nuclear-energy-our-best-hope
1:40; the point made there is one that I always use. Parents should screen their games. Sit in for the first hour, read the reviews, watch the Lets Plays before you let your kid loose.
For the rest of the video, the guest pulls back as apposed to what some of you believe. He doesn't say there is a liberal agenda, but they are pushing things that parents might not agree with. Do I believe that often things are pushed that I don't agree with? Of course. I don't think God is in enough games but that's just me. I still play them and as often as I can, I go against what they set up for me.
I might just get Sim City just to make one of the most wealthy cities in the world with the lowest poverty rate without alternative energy.
I decided to give Escapist the benefit of the doubt on the subject. I had a feeling they would be anti-Fox the moment I saw the title but I do know that often the more elder of the correspondents have been a bit uneducated on the subject (See O'Reilly on Mass Effect but don't change the subject). So, I'll watch the video and comment on each thing I hear.
0:20; One part of the Sim City games is that you are fined if your city isn't 'eco-friendly'. Now, in the real world there are fines for being anti-eco. That is polluting. But I can't find laws stating that a city has to be eco-friendly (Planting trees and enacting clean air ordinances and car emissions ordinances.) That's called a nudge and I don't like that.
1:00; The game apparently pushes planting soy farms and alternative energy sources as apposed to Nuclear plants. I'm sure it doesn't explain that not all people like soy and that alternative energy sources at the moment are not as efficient in land and materials needed compared to Nuclear plants. At least James Lovelock believes so. http://discovermagazine.com/2008/may/02-is-nuclear-energy-our-best-hope
1:40; the point made there is one that I always use. Parents should screen their games. Sit in for the first hour, read the reviews, watch the Lets Plays before you let your kid loose.
For the rest of the video, the guest pulls back as apposed to what some of you believe. He doesn't say there is a liberal agenda, but they are pushing things that parents might not agree with. Do I believe that often things are pushed that I don't agree with? Of course. I don't think God is in enough games but that's just me. I still play them and as often as I can, I go against what they set up for me.
I might just get Sim City just to make one of the most wealthy cities in the world with the lowest poverty rate without alternative energy.