- Jan 15, 2013
- United Kingdom
As I said before, I'm not interested in why you consider certain criticisms to be invalid. It's irrelevant blustering about opinions you don't like.Oh and criminal defamation is almost never prosecuted it just remains on the book as a law. Like how it was illegal to see a grey squirrel and not report it to pest control in the UK.
Also again it was a defamatory remark and the only criticism was the rather stupid call that said Factorio Dev should join in the defamation and I don't consider the theme of "Why won't you jump with me off this cliff" to be any kind of actually valid criticism of a person and I have to question who honestly would? IMHO the person who would consider such thing to be valid criticism is some-one who is very into the idea of peer pressure either using it themselves or being very susceptible to it and been pressured into a lot of stuff.
I can't see a single reason to take that obviously subjective statement as a claim of fact.They were presented as such.
No, we do not need to preface every statement of opinion with "I feel..." in order for it to be recognised as a statement of opinion. Utterly unnecessary.
How does this justify the false accusation that people condoned abuse and harassment?You did however make the specific claim that none of the options I put forward was the right answer. So how do you know the right one when so far people haven't objected to the thing.
Probably because its a waste of time; I've clarified what my own position is dozens of times (criticism = fine, abuse and harassment = not fine) but you just keep hurling false accusations anyway.Yet why would they refuse to clarify unless it was a poor PR move and they knew it to tell the truth of their position.
If you ignore what we say, why keep trying to clarify? After the umpteenth time it starts to feel futile.