Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
Kind of the point I was making really we would know but apparently the literal head of the big companies are too worried about some supposed side effects to actually vaccinate refugees.
The USA has no protection from freedom of political affiliation unlike the UK. You only have protection for freedom of religion. So yeh being found to be a supporter of AntiFA and firing him is perfectly fine in the USA, same as if he were a proud boys supporter or any other group. Hell you could be fired for being a democrat or republican supporter and thanks to the US lack of protections for workers rights in that regard firing him would be fine legally. Morally it would be dubious to do but legally fine.
The issue I'd say with the teacher is them talking about their political affiliation and advocating for said group and attending protests in class to his students. That's a huge ethical no-no in schools. Teachers are not supposed to show overt support for political parties or groups in front of students nor be seen to be influencing students to support certain groups or parties. You are expected to be neutral and as much as possible not talk about or bring news events in front of students unless they are relevant in some way to your lesson. It's done that way to try and protect children from undue influence or people who may wish to recruit them to certain groups or attempt some kind of indoctrination.
‘Anti-5G’ necklaces are radioactive and dangerous, Dutch nuclear experts say
Officials issue product alert and say ‘quantum pendants’ could damage DNA with prolonged use
www.theguardian.com
You could not make this shit up. Nobody would allow it.
(Then again, this announcement would be the exact sort of propaganda a deep state trying to control the population with 5G magic waves would publish...NO YOU WONT GET INTO HEAD THAT WAY! J'EFUSE!)
Last edited:
To be fair, as fair as can be, the whole negative ion thing has been a general snake oil against a bunch of health issues, not just 5g wackiness.‘Anti-5G’ necklaces are radioactive and dangerous, Dutch nuclear experts say
Officials issue product alert and say ‘quantum pendants’ could damage DNA with prolonged use
You could not make this shit up. Nobody would allow it.
You're flat-out wrong there. At least, according to the courts, who believe that while not expressedly listed as a right in the First Amendment, the freedom of association is still recognized as a fundamental right. Among other things, this includes the right to both associate and not associate with certain groups.
Why i usually don't agree with Seanchaidhs ideas about media trustworthyness, there is the fact that many European sources only report 75000-100000 solcdiers, not 175000 near the Ukrainian border.
But then again the Forbes language include phrases like "plans for the offensive could involve around 175,000 personnel" which basically means they did inflate the numbers with troops that might be moved there in the future but are not anywhere near by now.
Last edited:
I think that comes down to individual cases more than a standard law though.
The two heads that the vaccine made me grow on my back can't decide if they agree with you or not. I'm not getting involved, because between you and me, I think they're both kinda crazy.
Well, it's not like they're going to develop brain cancer. Too small a target for the radiation to hit.‘Anti-5G’ necklaces are radioactive and dangerous, Dutch nuclear experts say
Officials issue product alert and say ‘quantum pendants’ could damage DNA with prolonged use
You could not make this shit up. Nobody would allow it.
So you're not jiving with the Moms for Liberty group in Tennessee?
Well of course. Having worker protections is Communism.
Well, you can always say the experts are paid off or cover ups are being maintained. Bulletproof arguements those are.
Why not? Are you a Communist? Why do you support CRT all of a sudden?
Oh, and also, Trump supporters, this is why we make fun of you...
I am starting to get what I think is Biden's strategy, and why he is not acting very strongly on Russia and Iran, but on China.
1. Biden wants for there to be dead Ukrainians so that Europeans increase their defense spending out of fear, and increase readiness.
2. Biden is horse-trading, hey Europe we will defend you from Russia, and to the Saudis & Israelis from the Iranians, in exchange, Saudi Arabia raises production of oil to decrease the price of Brent crude in incase of war, and Europe helps with China.
3. He really wants to deescalate, and appease Russia in exchange he removes them from the China-Russia alliance, he loses Europe and Ukraine as a result.
4. A mixture of 1, and 2
More clues to Biden's strategic thinking...
In the 1970s, Mr. Biden opposed giving aid to the South Vietnamese government in its war against the North. Congress's cut-off of funds contributed to the fall of an American ally, helped communism advance, and led to mass death throughout the region. Mr. Biden also advocated defense cuts so massive that both Edmund Muskie and Walter Mondale, both leading liberal Democrats at the time, opposed them.
www.wsj.com
In the early 1980s, the U.S. was engaged in a debate over funding the Contras, a group of Nicaraguan freedom fighters attempting to overthrow the Communist regime of Daniel Ortega. Mr. Biden was a leading opponent of President Ronald Reagan's efforts to fund the Contras. He also opposed Reagan's efforts to send military assistance to the pro-American government in El Salvador, which at the time was battling the FMLN, a Soviet-supported Marxist group.
The most telling part of Biden...
Throughout his career, Mr. Biden has consistently opposed modernization of our strategic nuclear forces. He was a fierce opponent of Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative. Mr. Biden voted against funding SDI, saying, "The president's continued adherence to [SDI] constitutes one of the most reckless and irresponsible acts in the history of modern statecraft." Mr. Biden has remained a consistent critic of missile defense and even opposed the U.S. dropping out of the Antiballistic Missile Treaty after the collapse of the Soviet Union (which was the co-signatory to the ABM Treaty) and the end of the Cold War
So he believes in nuclear deterrence, he's likely a defensive realist like Obama.
1. Biden wants for there to be dead Ukrainians so that Europeans increase their defense spending out of fear, and increase readiness.
2. Biden is horse-trading, hey Europe we will defend you from Russia, and to the Saudis & Israelis from the Iranians, in exchange, Saudi Arabia raises production of oil to decrease the price of Brent crude in incase of war, and Europe helps with China.
3. He really wants to deescalate, and appease Russia in exchange he removes them from the China-Russia alliance, he loses Europe and Ukraine as a result.
4. A mixture of 1, and 2
More clues to Biden's strategic thinking...
In the 1970s, Mr. Biden opposed giving aid to the South Vietnamese government in its war against the North. Congress's cut-off of funds contributed to the fall of an American ally, helped communism advance, and led to mass death throughout the region. Mr. Biden also advocated defense cuts so massive that both Edmund Muskie and Walter Mondale, both leading liberal Democrats at the time, opposed them.
Biden Was Wrong On the Cold War - WSJ
www.wsj.com
In the early 1980s, the U.S. was engaged in a debate over funding the Contras, a group of Nicaraguan freedom fighters attempting to overthrow the Communist regime of Daniel Ortega. Mr. Biden was a leading opponent of President Ronald Reagan's efforts to fund the Contras. He also opposed Reagan's efforts to send military assistance to the pro-American government in El Salvador, which at the time was battling the FMLN, a Soviet-supported Marxist group.
The most telling part of Biden...
Throughout his career, Mr. Biden has consistently opposed modernization of our strategic nuclear forces. He was a fierce opponent of Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative. Mr. Biden voted against funding SDI, saying, "The president's continued adherence to [SDI] constitutes one of the most reckless and irresponsible acts in the history of modern statecraft." Mr. Biden has remained a consistent critic of missile defense and even opposed the U.S. dropping out of the Antiballistic Missile Treaty after the collapse of the Soviet Union (which was the co-signatory to the ABM Treaty) and the end of the Cold War
So he believes in nuclear deterrence, he's likely a defensive realist like Obama.
Last edited:
Corporate Media Joins the Anti-Vaxxers When It Comes to Chinese- and Russian-Made Vaccines
The consistent message to the world in U.S. media has been “The Chinese (and Russian) vaccines are ineffective or dangerous."
www.mintpressnews.com
The South Vietnamese government were a bunch of corrupt fuckers facing a popular revolt, we shouldn't've backed them
The Contras were a rebel force that arose after the Sandinista National Liberation Front overthrew Nicaragua's resident and US backed dictatorship. They tended to do a *lot* of terrorism and we sold missiles to Iran and bought and sold drugs from Noriega to fund them. We should not have gotten involved.
So, do you think that the US supporting a military junta with no qualms about murdering civilians via military death squads was a good thing?
Sooner or later you're gonna realize that these leftist revolutions don't spring up out of the ether. Usually they form because the US is backing a violent, oppressive dictator in the name of capitalism.
Excuse me but who made us the world police? Do we really need to start world war 3 over Ukraine? Also the war in Vietnam was lost! Decades and millions of dollars spent and nothing to show for. A war involved in a country that never attacked us. I rather see not one human being get slaughtered because some idiotic politician thinks war is a good idea to solve our problems.I am starting to get what I think is Biden's strategy, and why he is not acting very strongly on Russia and Iran, but on China.
1. Biden wants for there to be dead Ukrainians so that Europeans increase their defense spending out of fear, and increase readiness.
2. Biden is horse-trading, hey Europe we will defend you from Russia, and to the Saudis & Israelis from the Iranians, in exchange, Saudi Arabia raises production of oil to decrease the price of Brent crude in incase of war, and Europe helps with China.
3. He really wants to deescalate, and appease Russia in exchange he removes them from the China-Russia alliance, he loses Europe and Ukraine as a result.
4. A mixture of 1, and 2
More clues to Biden's strategic thinking...
In the 1970s, Mr. Biden opposed giving aid to the South Vietnamese government in its war against the North. Congress's cut-off of funds contributed to the fall of an American ally, helped communism advance, and led to mass death throughout the region. Mr. Biden also advocated defense cuts so massive that both Edmund Muskie and Walter Mondale, both leading liberal Democrats at the time, opposed them.
Biden Was Wrong On the Cold War - WSJ
In the early 1980s, the U.S. was engaged in a debate over funding the Contras, a group of Nicaraguan freedom fighters attempting to overthrow the Communist regime of Daniel Ortega. Mr. Biden was a leading opponent of President Ronald Reagan's efforts to fund the Contras. He also opposed Reagan's efforts to send military assistance to the pro-American government in El Salvador, which at the time was battling the FMLN, a Soviet-supported Marxist group.
The most telling part of Biden...
Throughout his career, Mr. Biden has consistently opposed modernization of our strategic nuclear forces. He was a fierce opponent of Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative. Mr. Biden voted against funding SDI, saying, "The president's continued adherence to [SDI] constitutes one of the most reckless and irresponsible acts in the history of modern statecraft." Mr. Biden has remained a consistent critic of missile defense and even opposed the U.S. dropping out of the Antiballistic Missile Treaty after the collapse of the Soviet Union (which was the co-signatory to the ABM Treaty) and the end of the Cold War
So he believes in nuclear deterrence, he's likely a defensive realist like Obama.