Again, I didn't read the article, I'm talking about generally, you'll always have institutional racism. I bet if I went to an Asian country that's like 90+% Asian, I'd run into institutional racism even though I doubt people were genuinely racist. The far-right doesn't cause institutional racism, it's a normal human tendency. Thus, some place with institutional racism isn't because of the far-right.
"I didn't read the article but definitely know better about the subject of it".
It almost passed in Minnesota and it wasn't people on the right voting for it.
Oh, you mean the Minneapolis initiative, which (while termed 'defund the police') actually aimed to.... rename it, shift some funding, and transfer where the oversight rested?
As long as it's not unlawful and a valid interpretation.
Ah yes, of course. But you know that in a lot of decisions, a basis can be found for pretty much any result if you really stretch and twist some definitions. That's what they do: utilise whatever interpretation best suits their political inclination, even if better and more solid rationales exist.
much faster than that. are you drunk?
Strange, considering people have already been voting third party for dozens of electoral cycles, and it hasn't shifted the pointer an inch. Any day now!
Ah, though it did hand the Florida and Nevada governorships to the Republicans, bringing abortion restrictions, voting rights infringements, blocks to migrant housing etc.