people-cut-snacks-drinks-in-recession-fears
LOL. You know, I cut down on snacks and sugary drinks recently. So did my dad. So did a lot of people I know. It was Lent. Trump's recent tariffs coincided with Lent in a nation that is over half Christian and over 20% Catholic. People give up snacks and soda for Lent. And then also, literally millions of people have gone on GLP-1 medications, which reduce or eliminate the cravings that drive people to snack foods. But no, it's definitely the secret canary in the economic coal mine (even though we've been hearing
over the last few years of inflation that snacks have surprisingly inelastic demand even as prices drive up, and were likely the last thing people would cut, rather than the first...)
Rationalization is a hell of a drug.
It looks exactly like all the other ones we know from history.
If you are intent to, any regime anywhere looks like any of the others. The basics of society are the same no matter who is in charge, you get similarities like "Oh God! They're enforcing immigration law! Like fascists!" when literally every working modern society has done that and it wasn't controversial until 10 years ago. "Oh no, he has a rich advisor! Like fascism!" when that's true of every government in every form since the invention of money. "But, they aren't strictly following the letter of the law!" just like Biden, or Obama, or Bush didn't either. Or Thomas Jefferson for that matter. The media tells me that Trump not following the law so precisely is a dangerous fall towards fascism, but there was this Jefferson fellow who had some thoughts:
" To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means. "
In reality, I see little evidence that any part of Trump is particularly unprecedented or any closer to fascism than Thomas Jefferson was. I do, however, recognize the popularity of conservatism in America, and appreciate that framing a person as unprecedented and dangerous to the status quo is a persuasive argument in as much as it appeals to the conservative nature of society.