if you dont mind spoilers, read on:FalloutJack said:Daenerys is the one with all of her shit together, to be sure, but the one with all the brains in Westeros is Tyrion. Could we vote for both? Make the kingdom a Matriarchy with Tyrion as Hand and chief advisor? I believe Daenerys would agree that little men must have to think alot, since there's only so much else they can do otherwise.
you will be surprisedDaViller said:I would nomiate tyrion or tywin with favor towards tyrion.
The Harkinator said:Jon Snow may be a skilled leader, but he knows little of ruling. Any provable claims to the throne would be shaky at best since any incidents tying him to the throne happened many years ago and only a scant few remember or even know. Good luck getting people to accept Jon is the rightful ruler.
Actually it was established even before that that Daenerys is immune to fire. she woudl hold her hand over the fire and whatnot. Altrough you are correct that it was kind of inconsistent. Also something happens in the 5th book that also reassuers her immunity, read my original spoiler if you want to know what.Silvanus said:Note, Targaryens are not, in fact, impervious to fire. Daenerys' feat with Khal Drogo's funeral pyre was an incredible phenomenon, but it does not mean she is fire-immune. It seems to have been a one-off miraculous event, even with her family. She burns her hands at a later point, pain and all.
Strazdas said:-snip-
Character deaths are extragarated. Lets just say the "Whoever your rooting for, he dies anyway" is false. Neither of the 3 characters i rooted for died.suitepee7 said:Strazdas said:-snip-he turns up at some stage in the books that are available, keep reading, it's pretty awesome when he does
i'm genuinely curious as to how many of the actors have read the books, because as we've already seen, characters die a lot. if i were doing that, i'd be finding out all spoilers, then rewriting the screenplay writers books so i live forever rather than die and stop being paid...
anyway as for me, i can't say without spoiling shit, so you've been warned
personally, i think Aegon has a good chance, along with littlefinger. littlefinger is playing the long game, however he may have to move sooner than expected with the downfall of the whole lannister line. Aegon i think will soon have the support of Dorne, and reclaim a fair bit for his own, but i'm unsure if there will be a divide between Aegon and Dany. although come to think of it, wherever Dany is, I think she has lost a lot of her power, or will do when Barristan the Bold goes to war with her army. As for Jon... well, i dunno. I'm genuinely torn 50/50 whether he'll stay dead or be resurrected by melissandre. Also i know it's kinda random, but it would be pretty awesome if Ayra killed one of the claimants to the throne, have her go on a badass assassination mission
i'm gonna assume by the three you are rooting for, this means tyrion, hodor and jon? i won't say any more if that's the case, because you haven't finished and i'm not gonna be that guy, if you really want to spoil it for yourself then you can find out for yourself online. anyway if we're going that that theory, ned should have been on there. he didn't have a claim, but as far as honour, loyalty and fairness goes, it was hard to beat.Strazdas said:-snip
Oh boy oh boy are you in for a pleasant(i think) surpriseStrazdas said:As far as people suggesting The Spider, i personally liked him, however he is nowhere to be seen since the 3rd book so unlikely he will have significant takeover (i still ahvent finished 5th book yet).
That's not ruling, that's leading. His responsibilities are akin to commanding an army than ruling a Kingdom. Besides, he was deliberately brought up not being taught how to rule.Strazdas said:The Harkinator said:Jon Snow may be a skilled leader, but he knows little of ruling. Any provable claims to the throne would be shaky at best since any incidents tying him to the throne happened many years ago and only a scant few remember or even know. Good luck getting people to accept Jon is the rightful ruler.Well, considering John was voted into leader of the black watch, he sure has experience of ruling
Zac Jovanovic said:You lot are way, way too optimistic.
Also most of your happy ending wishful theories don't account for Aegon and Victarion.
It's established that she seems to have a high heat tolerance (with exceedingly hot baths etc), but Martin himself has clarified that the funeral pyre event was a one-off, and she probably wouldn't be able to do it again:Strazdas said:Actually it was established even before that that Daenerys is immune to fire. she woudl hold her hand over the fire and whatnot. Altrough you are correct that it was kind of inconsistent. Also something happens in the 5th book that also reassuers her immunity, read my original spoiler if you want to know what.
Ambiguity does remain about the extent of her capacity, though, you're right.George R R Martin said:Granny: "Do Targaryens become immune to fire once they "bond" to their dragons?"
George R. R. Martin: "Granny, thanks for asking that. It gives me a chance to clear up a common misconception. TARGARYENS ARE NOT IMMUNE TO FIRE! The birth of Dany's dragons was unique, magical, wonderous, a miracle. She is called The Unburnt because she walked into the flames and lived. But her brother sure as hell wasn't immune to that molten gold".
Revanshe: "So she won't be able to do it again?"
George R. R. Martin: "Probably not".
There are a couple of sample chapters available from The Winds of Winter,Strazdas said:Also, 6th book? I only know of 5. What sorcery is this.
You are correct on two out of 3 there. I do think that the way Robb was handled in the tv show was much more impactful that in the books, and im rarely one that gets overly attached to characters so i guess ill survive whatever is coming. I will spoil myself reading the book, Im over half in and the only reason i havent finished is it takes time.suitepee7 said:i'm gonna assume by the three you are rooting for, this means tyrion, hodor and jon? i won't say any more if that's the case, because you haven't finished and i'm not gonna be that guy, if you really want to spoil it for yourself then you can find out for yourself online. anyway if we're going that that theory, ned should have been on there. he didn't have a claim, but as far as honour, loyalty and fairness goes, it was hard to beat.
and yeahh my bad, thanks for pointing that out! my copies have a dance of dragons split into two so i forgot that it's technically one big book, i usually think of part 2 as the 6th even though it isn't
Well, that was very glad to hear. now i wish i was reading the book instead of working.Zac Jovanovic said:Oh boy oh boy are you in for a pleasant(i think) surprise
He's obviously not interested in ruling himself though, but he puts massive weight behind one of the candidates.
is more than an army. Its like a kingdom upon itself, self sufficient as far as economy goes and while usually the burden is shielded by two, the old one is dead and thenew one is not ready yet so he basically takes it all upon himself, including the newcommers from the north. He probably had more "ruling" to do that most kings with how much hinderance he faced. He was a good leader from the first day in there, but he also knows how to rule. at least thats my interperetations from what i read (im still to finnish the 5the book).The Harkinator said:That's not ruling, that's leading. His responsibilities are akin to commanding an army than ruling a Kingdom. Besides, he was deliberately brought up not being taught how to rule.
Have you read all the books? If you did not then DON'T open my spoilerThe Harkinator said:Daenerys appears to be unable to have children which puts her out of the runnings. She couldn't make a dynasty that survived her and everything would collapse after her death (assassinating Daenerys would cause anarchy in the realm) as she would have no legitimate heir. If she nominated a successor their claim to the throne would be weak enough to be challenged by any Lord Paramount. As a ruler she can do good things but a great many of her supposed successes (i.e. conquering Slavers Bay and holding it, her invasion power) are entirely reliant on the Dragons. Daenerys would like to think she is a good ruler but I don't think she is.
Tyrion would make a poor King, who would accept the Imp for the throne? Those who have read the books will also know other reasons why Tyrion would not be accepted for the throne. Besides, as capable as he is, Tyrion is much better suited to being the power behind the throne than the figurehead on it.
Jon Snow may be a skilled leader, but he knows little of ruling. Any provable claims to the throne would be shaky at best since any incidents tying him to the throne happened many years ago and only a scant few remember or even know. Good luck getting people to accept Jon is the rightful ruler.