A laugh "at someone's expense" is by definition malevolent.Generalissimo said:*puts down newspaper*
they were probably having a laugh at her expense, nothing malevolant
*picks up newspaper*
A laugh "at someone's expense" is by definition malevolent.Generalissimo said:*puts down newspaper*
they were probably having a laugh at her expense, nothing malevolant
*picks up newspaper*
So, let me get this straight.Dragonmouth said:A laugh "at someone's expense" is by definition malevolent.
Okay. Looks like a significant chunk of comedies are now evil. America's Funniest Home Videos? Evil. Any self-deprecating comedian? Evil. Any movie that uses schadenfreude? Evil.Dragonmouth said:A laugh "at someone's expense" is by definition malevolent.Generalissimo said:*puts down newspaper*
they were probably having a laugh at her expense, nothing malevolant
*picks up newspaper*
To imply women and men don't deserve defenders when bullied is both misogynisitic and misandristic.The Lunatic said:So, let me get this straight.Dragonmouth said:A laugh "at someone's expense" is by definition malevolent.
Some idiot does something stupid on the internet that makes themselves look even more like an idiot.
People laugh at their idiocy.
And that's wrong and totally the fault of everyone else but her?
Dragonmouth. I'm going to explain a concept very important to equality.
Women are just as capable of defending themselves and being responsible for the actions as men are. Women are not mentally weaker. You do not need to defend them. They are functional human beings who can do that themselves.
To imply that a woman cannot stand on her own merit and must be propped up at every occasion is actually really quite misogynistic.
Can you just delete your account?Dragonmouth said:FYI, the proGG subreddit KotakuInAction has at least TWO threads on Gamerfruit. Can GG get any more hypocritical?
Good intentions? Heh. A small chance of a good outcome but not good intentions. This was born out of mockery of Brianna Wu.Guerilla said:Sounds like the new low was just reached on the anti-GG side who were so quick to be offended once again that they missed the humor and good intentions of this hashtag. Not surprising at all.
Never said it was sexist.BadNewDingus said:Nothing sexist here. As I am sure women are laughing at her stupidity.
Good intentions about the charity. Wu is an idiot that deserves the mocking. People are being mocked every day because of the stupid shit they say, SJWs aren't going to prohibit people from making fun of stupidity now, take responsibility for the things you do and say ffs.Dragonmouth said:Good intentions? Heh. A small chance of a good outcome but not good intentions. This was born out of mockery of Brianna Wu.Guerilla said:Sounds like the new low was just reached on the anti-GG side who were so quick to be offended once again that they missed the humor and good intentions of this hashtag. Not surprising at all.
Coincidence or related? My cynical-side wonders if there is opportunism involved.Our genre is built almost entirely by independent developers who fell in love with PBBGs as players. They are uniquely connected to the community, and because of that their business practices are also unique. We think that's pretty darn awesome - absofruitly awesome, in fact.
Still not sure what Wu has done to violate journalistic ethics.Guerilla said:Good intentions about the charity. Wu is an idiot that deserves the mocking. People are being mocked every day because of the stupid shit they say, SJWs aren't going to prohibit people from making fun of stupidity now, take responsibility for the things you do and say ffs.Dragonmouth said:Good intentions? Heh. A small chance of a good outcome but not good intentions. This was born out of mockery of Brianna Wu.Guerilla said:Sounds like the new low was just reached on the anti-GG side who were so quick to be offended once again that they missed the humor and good intentions of this hashtag. Not surprising at all.
I like how you're moving the goalposts. Anyway, pretentious self-righteous idiocy is one of the things gg fights against. It's one of the ways game "journalists" use to censor, demand and hide their corruption. Imo and the opinion of others GG isn't just about corruption it's about these annoying self-righteous morons who think they can dictate to the industry how to make games.Dragonmouth said:Still not sure what Wu has done to violate journalistic ethics.
Imo humor, self-deprecation, and the ability to not be offended easily is a sign of intelligence, self-awareness and confidence so I wholeheartedly agree.Soleca said:In any argument you should side with the one who has a sense of humour.
Plus it didn't help that she said she wanted to de-escalate the situation, shortly before ditching Milo (costing him time and money), and going straight to MSNBC, HuffPo, and CNN and lie through her teeth, escalating the situation by a HUGE amount.Guerilla said:I like how you're moving the goalposts. Anyway, pretentious self-righteous idiocy is one of the things gg fights against. It's one of the ways game "journalists" use to censor, demand and hide their corruption. Imo and the opinion of others GG isn't just about corruption it's about these annoying self-righteous morons who think they can dictate to the industry how to make games.Dragonmouth said:Still not sure what Wu has done to violate journalistic ethics.
Isn't that what consumer movements are all about? Getting businesses to produce what you want? In that regard how is Wu different from what GG claims to be?Guerilla said:I like how you're moving the goalposts. Anyway, pretentious self-righteous idiocy is one of the things gg fights against. It's one of the ways game "journalists" use to censor, demand and hide their corruption. Imo and the opinion of others GG isn't just about corruption it's about these annoying self-righteous morons who think they can dictate to the industry how to make games.Dragonmouth said:Still not sure what Wu has done to violate journalistic ethics.