All irony aside, I'm glad they posted this. I hate these huge flashy ads telling me how "cool" kinectimals is.
Well, lets see.karloss01 said:i haven't yet used the marketplace since the update(been going striaght into games), are these ads in your face or are they ads like at the side of a website (like here for example)?
It's an interesting side-effect of a fix for something else.Amnestic said:"Neato" indeed. MSN is a free service, last I checked.Pandaman1911 said:-EDIT- Oh cool, it makes MSN.com ad-free too. Neato!
Would the Escapist mind elaborating on why encouraging adblocking for MSN.com in the form of an official news article is okay?
You made me laugh good sir, good job.hazabaza1 said:The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
EDIT: Yes, this post is a joke. Jesus fuck guys, stop quoting me.
Actually, no. The escapist is delivering hundereds hours of entertainment and information for free. Wihout ads, this place, IN THEORY wouldn't exist for you to post what you just did. However, Xbox Live is a pay service, and their advertising, while your paying for them. If you pay for the Escapist, no ads, since your paying. While on Xbox your paying for the console itself and the online support.Amnestic said:And yet, the Escapist seems more than willing to endorse this course of action while simultaneously banning people for the exact same thing.teknoarcanist said:If you use MSN.com for your news, then sure, blocking their ad streams is unacceptable.
Mixed messages, I think you'll agree.
I know you have already changed but to be honest I am quite surprised at someone being here as long as you not knowing that something like this needs to be specified as a joke on the Escapist.hazabaza1 said:Jesus, it was a joke.TheMagicLemur said:If you pay 20 bucks a year, you don't see any ads at all. Otherwise, those ads are there so that they can bring good content to you, the person bitching about having to see the ads. Are they sometimes annoying? Yes. But part of the deal with GETTING VIDEOS AND ARTICLES FOR FREE is watching ads. If you don't like it, contribute TWENTY FRIGGING DOLLARS A YEAR and you won't have to see them. Or don't visit the site; no one's making you.hazabaza1 said:The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
Considering all the people that have quoted I think I need to go update the post.
Like i've implied I know microsoft would be more than fine but they will make up that revenue difference somehow. Big companies don't make moves like getting rid of advertise to appease users, if users aren't happy let them leave, not enough would leave to fucking worry about it.Crono1973 said:I won't pay that so how am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?dmase said:Now I don't know how much ad revenue microsoft bring in but lets assume it would take 6 bucks a person per year to make up the difference. You, or whoever wants to pay for it is now charged 66 bucks a year instead of 60 or you can see and ad at the bottom of your screen. Your choice, I know which side I'm on. The side with 6 bucks!Crono1973 said:How am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?dmase said:Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.Crono1973 said:snipped
You know what the ads are? They are EXTRA income and without them Microsoft would do just fine.
Seems like the perfect scam though:
- offer XBOX Live service for a fee
- put up ads
- after everyone is used to the ads, offer to remove them for a fee
look through all the quotes i've made of crono's posts. Would you be willing to pay 6 dollars more a year to unclutter your dashboard?Muphin_Mann said:Only...your not hurting yourself. Your un-cluttering your dashboard.dmase said:Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.Crono1973 said:snipped
I figured people might have suddenly realised what sarcasm is. Evidently not.Glademaster said:I know you have already changed but to be honest I am quite surprised at someone being here as long as you not knowing that something like this needs to be specified as a joke on the Escapist.hazabaza1 said:Jesus, it was a joke.TheMagicLemur said:If you pay 20 bucks a year, you don't see any ads at all. Otherwise, those ads are there so that they can bring good content to you, the person bitching about having to see the ads. Are they sometimes annoying? Yes. But part of the deal with GETTING VIDEOS AND ARTICLES FOR FREE is watching ads. If you don't like it, contribute TWENTY FRIGGING DOLLARS A YEAR and you won't have to see them. Or don't visit the site; no one's making you.hazabaza1 said:The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
Considering all the people that have quoted I think I need to go update the post.
Honestly, Live Gold is something that I usually won't do because that's an extra 60 bucks that could go elsewhere, and I rarely ever use it. However, recently they had a special that removed 20 bucks from it, making it $40 instead. I thought, "wow, that's pretty good, and I just happen to have enough laying around. It's a spur of the moment impulse, but why not?"dmase said:look through all the quotes i've made of crono's posts. Would you be willing to pay 6 dollars more a year to unclutter your dashboard?
Now look, I think I have been clear. I won't pay to look at ads. If I think the subscription fee is reasonable, I will pay it but I won't look at ads. If you raise the subscription fee beyond what I think is reasonable I will cancel. I will NOT look at ads from a service I pay for!dmase said:Like i've implied I know microsoft would be more than fine but they will make up that revenue difference somehow. Big companies don't make moves like getting rid of advertise to appease users, if users aren't happy let them leave, not enough would leave to fucking worry about it.Crono1973 said:I won't pay that so how am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?dmase said:Now I don't know how much ad revenue microsoft bring in but lets assume it would take 6 bucks a person per year to make up the difference. You, or whoever wants to pay for it is now charged 66 bucks a year instead of 60 or you can see and ad at the bottom of your screen. Your choice, I know which side I'm on. The side with 6 bucks!Crono1973 said:How am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?dmase said:Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.Crono1973 said:snipped
You know what the ads are? They are EXTRA income and without them Microsoft would do just fine.
Seems like the perfect scam though:
- offer XBOX Live service for a fee
- put up ads
- after everyone is used to the ads, offer to remove them for a fee
Thats why I said other people, but anyways are there any services you pay for that you'd like premiums to drop a couple bucks? All you would have to do is look at some ads, seems like a smart move to use ads in conjunction with a pay service. At least it's not coming out of my pocket, you understand why ads aren't bad?
Precisely what I thought, I think this is freaking hilarious, the actual event and the Escapist reporting it like this.Bobic said:Random dude: "Hey, I use an adblocker on the escapist"
Escapist: "Lol, Suspended!"
. . .
Escapist: "Hey, here's how to block Xbox Ads"
Me: "Lol, Hypocrisy".
That's totally different. Somehow. and I'm sure someone will tell us how.esperandote said:On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.
Cloud saves is sexy. That's one of my favorite things on Steam. Anything without cloud saves on steam I end up cloud saving with Windows Live Sync.Sober Thal said:They did drop the ball on filtering the indie games by genre, but that could be an easy fix in another update. They are now offering a lot more services, mostly video (hence the ads for movies) and other services like: Cloud Saves/Profiles. No more jump drives needed when going to a friends house, that is really cool. Bing search engine with voice, then soon to come: News Shows, EPIX movies (whatever the hell that is), You Tube, TMZ, HBO Go... this update paves the way for some neat stuff.theultimateend said:I still think they shouldn't have had them show till people renewed their subscriptions and agreed to a TOS update. But that does seem fairly harmless.Sober Thal said:But the thing is, these 'ads' are for the content you own the XBOX for. They are ads for games you can download, movies from Zune, music ect. Like I said in a later post, they aren't showing ads for a car, a soda, or some insurance company, they are showing ads for their content.theultimateend said:The commercials should only show up after renewing your subscription.Sober Thal said:I love the 'Microsoft already has enough money' argument. Stay classy internet.
People paid 14.99 for a commercial free subscription service, not a bunch of commercially driven drivel.
NOW I don't even use xbox live so this doesn't impact me, I just think they handled it wrong.
PSN is free and uses ads, I'm 100% cool with that. Most of their ads are for the PSN games anywho.
Although recently Dirt 3 kept telling me there was DLC maps for sale and I found that a bit jarring and upsetting. But as long as the ads on Live aren't talking to you I probably wouldn't care.
Did these ads come with better services? Usually folks are more resistant when a company tries to get more money without providing increased quality of service. (I'm genuinely ignorant, I can't justify paying the money since the only games I liked were Viva Pinata 1 and 2...I wish there was a Viva Pinata 3 ).
EDIT: Oh yeah, and it has more interaction with that Facebook/Twitter crap... meh.
This makes me super sad. Because now I watch ads and they STILL don't have an employee sit in on films to warn and remove people who talk or use their phones .esperandote said:On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.
Captcha: alualid you're
I'm not!
I rarely go the movies these days but when I do, I take my PSP to help ignore the commercials.esperandote said:On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.
Captcha: alualid you're
I'm not!
I don't know how I can be more clear they will jack up the price if there are no ads at all with ads it's lower then it would be, the subscription fee that is.Crono1973 said:Now look, I think I have been clear. I won't pay to look at ads. If I think the subscription fee is reasonable, I will pay it but I won't look at ads. If you raise the subscription fee beyond what I think is reasonable I will cancel. I will NOT look at ads from a service I pay for!dmase said:Like i've implied I know microsoft would be more than fine but they will make up that revenue difference somehow. Big companies don't make moves like getting rid of advertise to appease users, if users aren't happy let them leave, not enough would leave to fucking worry about it.Crono1973 said:I won't pay that so how am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?dmase said:Now I don't know how much ad revenue microsoft bring in but lets assume it would take 6 bucks a person per year to make up the difference. You, or whoever wants to pay for it is now charged 66 bucks a year instead of 60 or you can see and ad at the bottom of your screen. Your choice, I know which side I'm on. The side with 6 bucks!Crono1973 said:How am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?dmase said:Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.Crono1973 said:snipped
You know what the ads are? They are EXTRA income and without them Microsoft would do just fine.
Seems like the perfect scam though:
- offer XBOX Live service for a fee
- put up ads
- after everyone is used to the ads, offer to remove them for a fee
Thats why I said other people, but anyways are there any services you pay for that you'd like premiums to drop a couple bucks? All you would have to do is look at some ads, seems like a smart move to use ads in conjunction with a pay service. At least it's not coming out of my pocket, you understand why ads aren't bad?
Perhaps the product is partially paid for by subscriptions and partially paid for by ad revenue? Given that I believe people have been banned on The Escapist for mentioning that AdBlock Plus can eliminate advertisements, I don't think The Escapist should be publishing articles on how to circumvent other companies' ads.Mike Kayatta said:Today, gamers and tech junkies tend to think of ads as a subsidy, a fair, passive way to "pay" for enjoying free content. That being said, the Xbox 360 isn't free, and nor is its Xbox Live service, so I think it's a fair question for gamers to ask why they should be bothered by advertisements while poking around the service they're shelling out for. If the ads don't bug you, then great. If they do, now you've got a way to knock them out.