Gamers Find Way to Block Ads From New Xbox Dashboard

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
All irony aside, I'm glad they posted this. I hate these huge flashy ads telling me how "cool" kinectimals is.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
karloss01 said:
i haven't yet used the marketplace since the update(been going striaght into games), are these ads in your face or are they ads like at the side of a website (like here for example)?
Well, lets see.
On your "home" page, you have one huge ad for something, two small ads for something, a Quickplay feature and the "Play game" button really small in the top right corner.
So, to make it simple, yes, it is very in your face, or at least it is IMO.
 

Pandaman1911

Fuzzy Cuddle Beast
Jan 3, 2011
601
0
0
Amnestic said:
Pandaman1911 said:
-EDIT- Oh cool, it makes MSN.com ad-free too. Neato!
"Neato" indeed. MSN is a free service, last I checked.

Would the Escapist mind elaborating on why encouraging adblocking for MSN.com in the form of an official news article is okay?
It's an interesting side-effect of a fix for something else.
 

esperandote

New member
Feb 25, 2009
3,605
0
0
On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.

Captcha: alualid you're

I'm not!
 

Aprilgold

New member
Apr 1, 2011
1,995
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
EDIT: Yes, this post is a joke. Jesus fuck guys, stop quoting me.
You made me laugh good sir, good job.

Microsoft, the whore of the gaming industry. You know its true.

Amnestic said:
teknoarcanist said:
If you use MSN.com for your news, then sure, blocking their ad streams is unacceptable.
And yet, the Escapist seems more than willing to endorse this course of action while simultaneously banning people for the exact same thing.

Mixed messages, I think you'll agree.
Actually, no. The escapist is delivering hundereds hours of entertainment and information for free. Wihout ads, this place, IN THEORY wouldn't exist for you to post what you just did. However, Xbox Live is a pay service, and their advertising, while your paying for them. If you pay for the Escapist, no ads, since your paying. While on Xbox your paying for the console itself and the online support.
 

onizero

New member
Dec 4, 2008
4
0
0
I don't really comment very much here, but i do notice something that makes me fear for the internet community at large.

So i get that sites like this and various other services get their revenue from ads, that's a super cool revenue strategy, and that some services (XBL, Cable TV, etc) use the ads to subsidize the subscription revenue to lower prices on customers. AND honestly i find a lot of interesting things that i wouldn't have otherwise happily purchased without said advertisements.

However, there is a tendency for advertisers, and the media developers they transmit through, to be entirely too aggressive. bigger, louder, more obtrusive advertisements ruin the experience these services provide. Additionally they trigger the internal filters within the viewer that cause us to ignore them. This is the classic junk mail trap that only serves to annoy the subscription base and cause consumers to go elsewhere.

I think its worth the argument that as a consumer of internet media, my equipment is being used to carry these services, and i have a right as the owner of this equipment to modify my router, computer, and software to only deliver the content that i want to experience. I WANT ADVERTISEMENTS, IF CARRIED UNOBTRUSIVELY (something the escapist does pretty well with banner and wrapper ads) but don't ask me to sit through pop-ups, or 30 second videos every 2 minuets (especially the same ones over and over). I will exercise my RIGHT to block those.

Instead of banning the people who talk about it, if XBL just practiced unobtrusive advertising techniques. Don't make them annoying and ill see their ads, problem solved.

cheers,
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
hazabaza1 said:
TheMagicLemur said:
hazabaza1 said:
The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
If you pay 20 bucks a year, you don't see any ads at all. Otherwise, those ads are there so that they can bring good content to you, the person bitching about having to see the ads. Are they sometimes annoying? Yes. But part of the deal with GETTING VIDEOS AND ARTICLES FOR FREE is watching ads. If you don't like it, contribute TWENTY FRIGGING DOLLARS A YEAR and you won't have to see them. Or don't visit the site; no one's making you.
Jesus, it was a joke.
Considering all the people that have quoted I think I need to go update the post.
I know you have already changed but to be honest I am quite surprised at someone being here as long as you not knowing that something like this needs to be specified as a joke on the Escapist.
 

dmase

New member
Mar 12, 2009
2,117
0
0
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.
How am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?
Now I don't know how much ad revenue microsoft bring in but lets assume it would take 6 bucks a person per year to make up the difference. You, or whoever wants to pay for it is now charged 66 bucks a year instead of 60 or you can see and ad at the bottom of your screen. Your choice, I know which side I'm on. The side with 6 bucks!
I won't pay that so how am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?

You know what the ads are? They are EXTRA income and without them Microsoft would do just fine.

Seems like the perfect scam though:

- offer XBOX Live service for a fee
- put up ads
- after everyone is used to the ads, offer to remove them for a fee
Like i've implied I know microsoft would be more than fine but they will make up that revenue difference somehow. Big companies don't make moves like getting rid of advertise to appease users, if users aren't happy let them leave, not enough would leave to fucking worry about it.

Thats why I said other people, but anyways are there any services you pay for that you'd like premiums to drop a couple bucks? All you would have to do is look at some ads, seems like a smart move to use ads in conjunction with a pay service. At least it's not coming out of my pocket, you understand why ads aren't bad?
 

dmase

New member
Mar 12, 2009
2,117
0
0
Muphin_Mann said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.
Only...your not hurting yourself. Your un-cluttering your dashboard.
look through all the quotes i've made of crono's posts. Would you be willing to pay 6 dollars more a year to unclutter your dashboard?
 

hazabaza1

Want Skyrim. Want. Do want.
Nov 26, 2008
9,612
0
0
Glademaster said:
hazabaza1 said:
TheMagicLemur said:
hazabaza1 said:
The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
If you pay 20 bucks a year, you don't see any ads at all. Otherwise, those ads are there so that they can bring good content to you, the person bitching about having to see the ads. Are they sometimes annoying? Yes. But part of the deal with GETTING VIDEOS AND ARTICLES FOR FREE is watching ads. If you don't like it, contribute TWENTY FRIGGING DOLLARS A YEAR and you won't have to see them. Or don't visit the site; no one's making you.
Jesus, it was a joke.
Considering all the people that have quoted I think I need to go update the post.
I know you have already changed but to be honest I am quite surprised at someone being here as long as you not knowing that something like this needs to be specified as a joke on the Escapist.
I figured people might have suddenly realised what sarcasm is. Evidently not.
 

Hiroshi Mishima

New member
Sep 25, 2008
407
0
0
dmase said:
look through all the quotes i've made of crono's posts. Would you be willing to pay 6 dollars more a year to unclutter your dashboard?
Honestly, Live Gold is something that I usually won't do because that's an extra 60 bucks that could go elsewhere, and I rarely ever use it. However, recently they had a special that removed 20 bucks from it, making it $40 instead. I thought, "wow, that's pretty good, and I just happen to have enough laying around. It's a spur of the moment impulse, but why not?"

I'll say that I have not really noticed any real improvement in my service since upgrading to Gold (nor did I that one month I tried it for $3 last year). The fact that, had I paid full price, and these clunky and obnoxious ads are still the first thing I see when I load up the console.. yeah, I probably wouldn't have bothered.

The fact is, I've paid for the damned system with money I didn't really have to spend last year, but I really wanted an Xbox 360 after playing my cousin's a lot. It was a lot better than the original Xbox which I felt was a useless coffee-table. Now, I've thrown more money at the thing so I could have the "luxury" of going Gold. I am not ad-free, it does not ramp up the experience, I have not "enjoyed" my games any more or less... there was no point.


To your question, would I pay $6 a year for no ads? If that was ALL I had to pay, then sure. If it was tacked onto the price of Gold? I'd be one of the first in line to disable ads.

However, despite my hatred of the ads, I am not going to use this technique to block the ads. Why? Because I know Microsoft, and I am anticipating their retaliation. If it never comes, that's great, but I don't wanna log in one day and find my account gone (especially since I only went Gold like 2 weeks ago).

But on the whole, I think the overabundance of ads on Xbox Live is quite unnecessary. I do not believe for a moment that Microsoft is in anyway hurting for money. I've read the reports and articles and the news, and I know that Microsft, and quite a few other companies out there, are not in the slightest way hurting for money. There's plenty of big corporations that have not been hurt at all by the economy, just the rest of us shmucks who found ourselves catacorized as "working poor".

Hey, if you got lots of cash to throw around, be my guest. Those who don't ever, once, click ads.. this is just an invasion of our privacy and a waste of our time. Like the junk mail I get that goes RIGHT into the recycle bin, cause I couldn't care less.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.
How am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?
Now I don't know how much ad revenue microsoft bring in but lets assume it would take 6 bucks a person per year to make up the difference. You, or whoever wants to pay for it is now charged 66 bucks a year instead of 60 or you can see and ad at the bottom of your screen. Your choice, I know which side I'm on. The side with 6 bucks!
I won't pay that so how am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?

You know what the ads are? They are EXTRA income and without them Microsoft would do just fine.

Seems like the perfect scam though:

- offer XBOX Live service for a fee
- put up ads
- after everyone is used to the ads, offer to remove them for a fee
Like i've implied I know microsoft would be more than fine but they will make up that revenue difference somehow. Big companies don't make moves like getting rid of advertise to appease users, if users aren't happy let them leave, not enough would leave to fucking worry about it.

Thats why I said other people, but anyways are there any services you pay for that you'd like premiums to drop a couple bucks? All you would have to do is look at some ads, seems like a smart move to use ads in conjunction with a pay service. At least it's not coming out of my pocket, you understand why ads aren't bad?
Now look, I think I have been clear. I won't pay to look at ads. If I think the subscription fee is reasonable, I will pay it but I won't look at ads. If you raise the subscription fee beyond what I think is reasonable I will cancel. I will NOT look at ads from a service I pay for!
 

dubious_wolf

Obfuscated Information
Jun 4, 2009
584
0
0
Well the escapist needs to upkeep it's image, because you know... it's free.
As Mike said adverts are subsidies, to make content free.
 

TheYellowCellPhone

New member
Sep 26, 2009
8,617
0
0
Bobic said:
Random dude: "Hey, I use an adblocker on the escapist"
Escapist: "Lol, Suspended!"

. . .

Escapist: "Hey, here's how to block Xbox Ads"
Me: "Lol, Hypocrisy".
Precisely what I thought, I think this is freaking hilarious, the actual event and the Escapist reporting it like this.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
esperandote said:
On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.
That's totally different. Somehow. and I'm sure someone will tell us how.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Sober Thal said:
theultimateend said:
Sober Thal said:
theultimateend said:
Sober Thal said:
I love the 'Microsoft already has enough money' argument. Stay classy internet.
The commercials should only show up after renewing your subscription.

People paid 14.99 for a commercial free subscription service, not a bunch of commercially driven drivel.

NOW I don't even use xbox live so this doesn't impact me, I just think they handled it wrong.

PSN is free and uses ads, I'm 100% cool with that. Most of their ads are for the PSN games anywho.
But the thing is, these 'ads' are for the content you own the XBOX for. They are ads for games you can download, movies from Zune, music ect. Like I said in a later post, they aren't showing ads for a car, a soda, or some insurance company, they are showing ads for their content.
I still think they shouldn't have had them show till people renewed their subscriptions and agreed to a TOS update. But that does seem fairly harmless.

Although recently Dirt 3 kept telling me there was DLC maps for sale and I found that a bit jarring and upsetting. But as long as the ads on Live aren't talking to you I probably wouldn't care.

Did these ads come with better services? Usually folks are more resistant when a company tries to get more money without providing increased quality of service. (I'm genuinely ignorant, I can't justify paying the money since the only games I liked were Viva Pinata 1 and 2...I wish there was a Viva Pinata 3 :( ).
They did drop the ball on filtering the indie games by genre, but that could be an easy fix in another update. They are now offering a lot more services, mostly video (hence the ads for movies) and other services like: Cloud Saves/Profiles. No more jump drives needed when going to a friends house, that is really cool. Bing search engine with voice, then soon to come: News Shows, EPIX movies (whatever the hell that is), You Tube, TMZ, HBO Go... this update paves the way for some neat stuff.

EDIT: Oh yeah, and it has more interaction with that Facebook/Twitter crap... meh.
Cloud saves is sexy. That's one of my favorite things on Steam. Anything without cloud saves on steam I end up cloud saving with Windows Live Sync.

So yeah if they are offering more stuff and threw on ads, I wouldn't be upset. Personally I prefer spending more to get a service without ads (if someone ever makes zune marketplace for television I will devour it wholesale) but I'm probably a minority since free is the new pay I guess.

I don't want to get banned so I won't say the name but there is a service for watching films that automatically updates you on new shows and can even download them for you to a watching queue. I would happily drop 10-20 (preferably no higher than 15 to match old zune prices) to have this service. But I don't think all the different networks would ever agree to share the pie :p.

I only mention it because its basically live sync for films, then you have live sync for games from steam (or close with consoles), and then music with zune. Hopefully in the next couple years this sort of universally connected system will be commonplace so that I can enjoy a service on all my hardware with 1 low price (or I suppose ads, but because of how few ads they tend to show I'd prefer pay).

But that's a super big digression, thanks for the information.

esperandote said:
On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.

Captcha: alualid you're

I'm not!
This makes me super sad. Because now I watch ads and they STILL don't have an employee sit in on films to warn and remove people who talk or use their phones :(.

I'd be happy as hell to watch a commercial if it net me any sort of improved service, but now I pay more, watch ads, and still have people talk the whole time and get upset when I ask them (nicely) to be silent.

Which is probably why I won't watch movies unless its a drive-in anymore :/.
 

Epona

Elite Member
Jun 24, 2011
4,221
0
41
Country
United States
esperandote said:
On a related subject, why the fuck should we watch commercials in movie theaters? We're already paying for the movie, the soda and the popcorn.

Captcha: alualid you're

I'm not!
I rarely go the movies these days but when I do, I take my PSP to help ignore the commercials.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
I haven't been able to actually use the new update because I'm capped. If the ads are so 'in your face' that blocking them is necessary, I'll use this. Thanks OP.
 

dmase

New member
Mar 12, 2009
2,117
0
0
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
dmase said:
Crono1973 said:
Truth is they will make the money because they can so by excluding the ad your just hurting yourself. Unless you have a unifying protest message against corporate greed that will gather the masses behind your cause.
How am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?
Now I don't know how much ad revenue microsoft bring in but lets assume it would take 6 bucks a person per year to make up the difference. You, or whoever wants to pay for it is now charged 66 bucks a year instead of 60 or you can see and ad at the bottom of your screen. Your choice, I know which side I'm on. The side with 6 bucks!
I won't pay that so how am I hurting myself by excluding the ads?

You know what the ads are? They are EXTRA income and without them Microsoft would do just fine.

Seems like the perfect scam though:

- offer XBOX Live service for a fee
- put up ads
- after everyone is used to the ads, offer to remove them for a fee
Like i've implied I know microsoft would be more than fine but they will make up that revenue difference somehow. Big companies don't make moves like getting rid of advertise to appease users, if users aren't happy let them leave, not enough would leave to fucking worry about it.

Thats why I said other people, but anyways are there any services you pay for that you'd like premiums to drop a couple bucks? All you would have to do is look at some ads, seems like a smart move to use ads in conjunction with a pay service. At least it's not coming out of my pocket, you understand why ads aren't bad?
Now look, I think I have been clear. I won't pay to look at ads. If I think the subscription fee is reasonable, I will pay it but I won't look at ads. If you raise the subscription fee beyond what I think is reasonable I will cancel. I will NOT look at ads from a service I pay for!
I don't know how I can be more clear they will jack up the price if there are no ads at all with ads it's lower then it would be, the subscription fee that is.
 

rainbowunicorns

New member
May 18, 2009
51
0
0
Mike Kayatta said:
Today, gamers and tech junkies tend to think of ads as a subsidy, a fair, passive way to "pay" for enjoying free content. That being said, the Xbox 360 isn't free, and nor is its Xbox Live service, so I think it's a fair question for gamers to ask why they should be bothered by advertisements while poking around the service they're shelling out for. If the ads don't bug you, then great. If they do, now you've got a way to knock them out.
Perhaps the product is partially paid for by subscriptions and partially paid for by ad revenue? Given that I believe people have been banned on The Escapist for mentioning that AdBlock Plus can eliminate advertisements, I don't think The Escapist should be publishing articles on how to circumvent other companies' ads.

Just food for thought.