SonicWaffle said:
hazabaza1 said:
The Escapist: Banning people for using adblock, and then telling people how to block ads.
Advertising is only bad when someone else makes money from it ;-)
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/12/09/1633257/google-facebook-upset-by-ad-injecting-apps
Irony is when someone else uses your business model to make money off your business model. Welcome tho Apple's modus operandi.
Amnestic said:
Pandaman1911 said:
Amnestic said:
Pandaman1911 said:
-EDIT- Oh cool, it makes MSN.com ad-free too. Neato!
"Neato" indeed. MSN is a free service, last I checked.
Would the Escapist mind elaborating on why encouraging adblocking for MSN.com in the form of an official news article is okay?
It's an interesting side-effect of a fix for something else.
Just like adblocking some of the Escapist is an "interesting side-effect" of a fix for something else, yes? Yet the Escapist rules state quite clearly that:
The Rules:
Similarly, posts including, advocating, or linking to illegal or adult material are a very quick way to end your time as part of The Escapist community. An example of these are:
-Piracy
-Ad Blockers
-Illegal Drugs in the United States
-Illegal Acts in the United States
-Pedophilia
-Pornography
-Sexist, Racist or Perverted Remarks
"Interesting side effect" or no, this newspost is clearly against the Escapist code of conduct.
I don't even care that much, I just wish people would stop pretending like it's not.
Aprilgold said:
Actually, no. The escapist is delivering hundereds hours of entertainment and information for free. Wihout ads, this place, IN THEORY wouldn't exist for you to post what you just did. However, Xbox Live is a pay service, and their advertising, while your paying for them. If you pay for the Escapist, no ads, since your paying. While on Xbox your paying for the console itself and the online support.
Why're you talking about the Xbox? What does that have to do with my point? Why are people so intent on reading arguments into my posts that I don't make?
I can understand how The Escapist wouldn't want to be caught even third-handed seeming to support piracy, pr0n, or hate speech. However, equating ad blocking software or techniques with the same is honestly insulting. If they were to come out and say up front "We don't allow talk about or supporting ad blocking because it hurts our source of income", then I'd respect them for that. It's like Wal-Mart/Kmart/Target not allowing other companies to use their property for advertising, such as leaflets or people walking around selling stuff. It's a clear conflict of interest.
But when The Escapist equates ad blocking on the same level as sites such as [BLUR], [BLUR], and most famous of all, [BLUR], that just strikes me as being really hypocritical. HOWEVER, I can admit that wanting to remove ads from a service you already pay for, thus realistically removing the need for ad revenue in the first place, can be seen as a form of Street Justice.
This also reminds me of the last issue of XBN Magazine. When XBN found out they were going to be cancelled, they decided to thumb their nose at their publishers and MS in the same step. There was a several page article in their last issue, discussing, IN DETAIL, about how to cheat online withe Halo 2's multiplayer, including the infamous sword glitch, how to walk on air, and how to use modems with standby functions to disappear and reappear in order to win the Capture the Flag games. What were they going to do to them, honestly? They were already cancelling the magazine, so nothing else could have been done, realistically.