I agree, I rather enjoyed playing that game, not saying it was superb or anything, but I still think it didn't deserve the abuse it got either.Hazzard said:I liked Star Wars: the force unleased, the first one, but it was too short because half the levels were only on xbox or PS3. It was a good game though.
That game has one of the most ridiculously awesome titles ever. I can't help but smile whenever I see it. (Even though "teräskäsi" is a compound word so there shouldn't be a space there. Or maybe that makes it more funny, I don't know.)Regnes said:![]()
I had a lot of fun playing this game, and it wasn't until years after it got old that I found out it is one of the most notoriously shitty fighter games ever.
I have fond memories of the game, though after reading reviews of it, I can agree with it's faults. If you didn't have a lightsaber or Arden Lynn, you were going to get your ass kicked by the other player.
I know one critic who actually LOVES Dynasty Warrior: Jim Sterling from Destructoid, or the Jimquisition here on the Escapist. You might want to see what he thinks about future DW releases, since he's more likely to give the opinion of an actual DW fan on a new game, which would probably be more useful to you than the opinion of someone who never liked the games much anyway.Glass Joe the Champ said:I think Dynasty Warrior games are more fun to play than they're given credit for, and there's a charm in its ridiculousness. Not exactly a buy for everyone, and the series does get a bit sequel happy, but at the least, it's a good rental if you've got a buddy in town.
Haha, I still have that game floating around somewhere. I remember unlocking Darth Vader in it, awesomesauce. That and the pig guard whose special move was to grow huge then shoot out flames.Regnes said:
In what world did Mass Effect and Assassin's Creed get bad reviews?Elmoth said:Assassin's Creed 1 and Mass Effect 1. Love these games. Both slower and less 'epic' than their sequels, but much better written. (I can not understand how anyone can stand the over the top stereotype characters in AC2. Fucking nerd girl pisses me off.)
And I like Hellgate: London.
I don't know if i'd go that far - I think story wise and dialogue mechanics wise it's probably better - but combat and overall polish go to DXHR. Both are great though!Fat_Hippo said:This is turning into an Alpha Protocol love thread. That's a VERY good thing. It definitely did not deserve the bashing it got upon release. WAY better than Deus Ex: Human Revolutions in my opinion.
I was thinking the same thing.Glass Joe the Champ said:In what world did Mass Effect and Assassin's Creed get bad reviews?Elmoth said:Assassin's Creed 1 and Mass Effect 1. Love these games. Both slower and less 'epic' than their sequels, but much better written. (I can not understand how anyone can stand the over the top stereotype characters in AC2. Fucking nerd girl pisses me off.)
And I like Hellgate: London.
I just picked it up off PSN, I'll agree it looks alright. Not seen anything yet that really makes me love it, I'm not much of a fan of the Western setting but I did literally just start it. Controls are a bit dodgy but it's nothing deal breaking.Tanis said:God Hand - This game got HAMMERED by reviewers but I LOVE(D) it.
I love both Kane and Lynch games. They're great for split-screen co-op. The controls are a tad clunky, but once you get around that, it's all good. Great voice acting from the main cast, too.Just Plain Lazy said:Kane and Lynch 2: Dog Days is up there as one of my all time favorite games, it's just so much mindless fun, that I will agree is very short but hell I still like the game-play and the lack of a better term "dark" story line you follow them through.