Arkham City. I loved Arkham Asylum, but just feel the large sandbox setting detracts hugely from the game. Hit a snag early on where I just couldn't find where to go and gave up. Played about two/three hours total maybe.
The same way having a lower ThAC0 means you're more likely to hit.shrekfan246 said:Also, how did it ever make sense that gaining armor would lower your armor score?
I basically lost all interest when I finished a mission in which my headquarters was blown up and we had to evacuate, and after the mission everything was back to normal. Building was back, headquarters was back; nothing changed at all. Same with destroying the zombies; WHY ARE THEY STILL HERE.putowtin said:Quick answer which I've just been talking about in another thread:
Saint's Row 3
I love the first two Saint's Row games, but the third just annoyed the hell out of me,
here's why:
*Too silly
*If you're gonna kill off a character, kill off Pierce! No-one liked him!
*Too silly
*Random plot that jumps all over the place
*Too silly
That's interesting. I had a bit of a tough time getting into it's ''sequel'' Dark Souls myself but once I got into it, it wouldn't let me go. I'm actually still playing it. I must have sunk over a hundred hours into it, easily. Assuming Demon's Souls isn't too different from Dark Souls, it is a little tough to get a hang of the game since it doesn't really explain anything to you. The Wiki's on Dark Souls were a great help to me too.felbot said:demon souls, the settings, the difficulty, the armor sets, i like all these things and yet i dont like it.
Perhaps you ought to read the OP, as well as the title again.mohit9206 said:SKYRIM : this was my first elder scrolls game. this was supposed to be so awesome and so hyped up. but all it is just a list of boring fetch quests and dull characters thin story etc.huge world to explore but nothing worth exploring for
SAINTS ROW 3: i bought this game after reading many reviews stating how fun and over the top this game is.
but its not all that fun. its same boring repetitive mission to go kill a thousand guys at this place. story is very dull and lifeless.
MIRRORS EDGE : terrible story , repetitive gameplay and horrible combat make this a very non fun game to me
Glad I'm not alone with that one.DYin01 said:I was playing Crysis 2 recently and while I enjoyed the combat and the phenomenal graphics, I had a hard time keeping myself engaged. After a few hours I quit and I never really picked it back up again.
There's literally one naked woman the entire game that isn't reliant on a choice you make. And another that isn't from you literally requesting to see a naked woman(If you kill Baron LaValette) and that only shows up if you go to the dungeons instead of the other path. So unless you're constantly seeking nudity, the most you are going to see is one nude and one topless. Which is hardly alot [http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D_Z-D2tzi14/S8TRIo4br3I/AAAAAAAACv4/Zh7_GcMlRKo/s400/ALOT.png] of naked women. I mean comparatively Mass Effect 1 had close to the same nudity content.Kekkonen1 said:something isn't mature just because you put alot of naked women
Fair enough, I just know that the first thing that happens in the game is a sex-scene and I didn't play long after because I didn't care for the combat. Also, whether by choice or not you can't really contest that the game does have a kind of game-of-thrones esque fascination with sex, seeing as you in the first Witcher-game even collected cards for the women you had sex with if I remember correctly.Mycroft Holmes said:Hearts of Iron 3 - The load times just made it impossible for me to play without wanting to strangle myself which is sad because I really enjoyed its predecessors. Maybe I should go back and try it again with a super powerful processor, I dunno.
There's literally one naked woman the entire game that isn't reliant on a choice you make. And another that isn't from you literally requesting to see a naked woman(If you kill Baron LaValette) and that only shows up if you go to the dungeons instead of the other path. So unless you're constantly seeking nudity, the most you are going to see is one nude and one topless. Which is hardly alot [http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_D_Z-D2tzi14/S8TRIo4br3I/AAAAAAAACv4/Zh7_GcMlRKo/s400/ALOT.png] of naked women. I mean comparatively Mass Effect 1 had close to the same nudity content.Kekkonen1 said:something isn't mature just because you put alot of naked women
I overall enjoyed 3 but yeah, 2's campaign was better. As to why the story bothered you, I think it's b/c in interviews, ND talked about how they had an idea for a set piece and tried to fit it in to the story. I don't know if that's the way they did it for 2, but if it was, it didn't work as well for 3. Plus the villains, were kinda disappointing. Marlowe hardly does anything, and Talbot is kinda confusing. Is he mystical? How does he vanish into thin air and take a bullet to the gut and come back like nothing happened? What's his connection to Marlowe, he seems, really loyal to her for some reason.freakydan said:Uncharted 3
The first game was pretty good, the second was friggin amazing, but the third one...I just...I dunno...
Parts of it felt really cheap, and the story really bothered me for some reason I don't remember. I seem to remember the controls or combat or something bothering me a lot, too. I guess I felt like Uncharted 2 had a really great balance to it, and 3 tried tweaking it to make a lot of things better, and it completely threw off the balance. By the end, I kept playing simply because I refused to let the game win.
You know its bad when something horrible happens to one of your favorite characters...
...and it doesn't make any sort of emotional impact. Its all made worse when...Sully dying.
In short, I really can't think of a single thing I liked about Uncharted 3, which is too bad, because I can't think about a single significant issue I had with Uncharted 2.it turns out the whole the was a hallucination. Like they were TRYING to pull at my heartstrings and manipulate my emotions, but they failed at the whole thing so spectacularly.
Sure, can't argue with that. But Game of Thrones much like TW2 has a great deal of actually maturity and depth that goes beyond the superficial. They are actually quite alike. The chief difference where storytelling is concerned, is that TW2 is told through one set of eyes, whereas GoT is told through dozens. There's the same gore, nudity, cursing but there's also the same political intrigue and moral depth. And that's what makes both actually mature.Kekkonen1 said:Also, whether by choice or not you can't really contest that the game does have a kind of game-of-thrones esque fascination with sex, seeing as you in the first Witcher-game even collected cards for the women you had sex with if I remember correctly.