I care because I thought it was a beautiful moment (the whole scene and the build up to it) and I truly saw the love that Ellie had for Riley, and vice versa. I can't say that I've seen the likes of that in a game before.JupiterBase said:What i really want to know is how many of us discussing this really care? To me this is more important because of peoples reactions then what actually happened in the story. I like the story i stilldo because a character kissed another doesnt matter to me. I still like Ellie. Shes a sweetheart, and regardless of her orientation in the story it feels more like shes just desperate NOT TO LOSE ANYBODY ELSE.
I'm sorry but I just have to ask, why does a character need a purpose to be gay?Kyber said:Maybe next to join the characters who have no real purpose for being gay other than to sell, will be clementine. Wouldn't surprise me all that much, even if it was a tad weird because of her age.
It ultimately holds no significance to the main story line. I mean, in hindsight can you point to anywhere in the main game and say 'So that's why that is' or 'Oh, that's an interesting connection'? Even the time when you have Ellie examine Riley's pendant you never get any indication they were more than just good friends.The Crispy Tiger said:Okay, on the Sam thing, fair enough. But I still disagree on the Riley thing, no one said it didn't have any significance in her life. Matter of fact, Riley's last words to her seem to be something she holds dear and still lives to (with Joel). It's someone who obviously influenced her to be so caring about Joel. I mean there's a certain level of giving a shit that people can do in this world, and Ellie kind of cared more for Joel then most people would in this world. Just look at Tess or hell, even Joel's brother is not this god damn caring and you could make an argument that she's just a kid, but disagree.
On top of that, why the fuck would mention Riley to Joel. I mean seriously, when was there a good time to bring up her dead best friend. There are many people in my life that I love that I don't bring up often. Like my grandmother that passed away, sure I mention her every once in a while, but for the most part, there's usually no reason to bring her up. Until you gave me a reason to bring it up. I just think you're overthinking this entire plot.
I'm sure that's just a really freaky coincidence. Naughty Dog's thought process was likely "Hey, people liked how Bill was gay, why don't we do the same with Ellie?"CriticKitten said:Not to mention the number of people who've pointed out that this may have just been added as a jab at Ellen Paige (who recently announced her sexuality), since she's been pressuring Naughty Dog over the use of her likeness in creating Ellie for some time now. And if that's the case, that arguably makes it even worse.
Well, if you look at Gone Home, that game wouldn't have gotten nearly as much attention if it would have been centered around a straight couple. I'm not saying it was a bad game, neither am I saying there's anything wrong with Ellie being gay, or any character for that matter, just pointing out that things that are still somewhat "controversial" are good selling points.DeadEyeDan said:I'm sorry but I just have to ask, why does a character need a purpose to be gay?Kyber said:Maybe next to join the characters who have no real purpose for being gay other than to sell, will be clementine. Wouldn't surprise me all that much, even if it was a tad weird because of her age.
Quite often the opposite is unfortunately true, in that most game protagonists are straight so that they will sell. On the description for Left Behind it is never said 'LOOK ELLIE KISSES A GIRL COME BUY THIS NOW'. It was a moment that simply added to her overall character, not made her defining trait that she was (possibly) a lesbian.
A person's sexual orientation does not define their entire existence or personality, and the same should be applicable to fictional characters.
Apologies. My intent was more to highlight that one particular scene being the one most talked about, when it was a relatively minor thing in the face of these young people trying to survive in a world gone very wrong. Along with my feelings of dread from knowing individuals with political aspirations are probably going to use this in their campaigns as a Strawman.The Crispy Tiger said:Umm... You kinda the point the minute you watch the scene on Youtube. It's about the journey getting there more then the actual scene it's self. Also, Naughty Dog's marketing department would be run by a 15 year old. That would be really impressive...
I see what you mean...Saetha said:Finally got to the part in question and I think... I think the main problem a lot of people have with it isn't that it's a lesbian romance, but that it's a badly-written lesbian romance. I mean... the kiss does feel a liiitle tacked on, don't you think? It just sort of... happens, and that's it. It's like Ellie and Riley don't even acknowledge it. There's no questioning of what this means, of how that changes their relationship - it's almost like it WAS just a friendly, affectionate kiss between buddies rather than... you know, romantic. Neither of them do anything about it, and it's never brought up again. It hasn't got anything to do with their sexual orientation (Unless you're arguing that Naughty Dog threw it in to score points with the LGBT crowd) but with the fact that it's just... out of place and weird. Frankly, I'd still be calling bullshit if Riley were a guy, or if Ellie was. There was just no point in including any romance at all.
I don't know, this sort of feels like Gone Home all over again - the only reason people are making a big deal out of it is because they're lesbians. If it were a heterosexual romance, people probably would've called it bad writing and moved on. But because they're both girls, that's "homophobic." You can't criticize it because it's "progressive."
Which is partially why I hate debates like these. You're not allowed to dislike something like a lesbian romance without everyone getting on your ass for discrimination, regardless of whether or not your criticism has anything to do with that. Diversity is not a substitute for quality.
Well, I mean, it can still be cute but be rather pointless from a narrative stand-point. It did have plenty of build-up (I've never fought with my best friend, so I don't know if such arguments bare similarity to lovers' quarrels, but I definitely got that feeling from some of their interactions) it just... didn't have any climax or resolution to me. It was just there.The Crispy Tiger said:I see what you mean...Saetha said:Snip
AND
I disagree, yeah just wanted to add suspense. I seriously didn't think it was tacked on. Maybe I'm just a sucker at this point. That's totally reasonable. But I thought it was cute.