/b/ also have a lot of resources. Christ alone knows the size of their botnet.Krion_Vark said:So saying how things could have been handled warranted an attack? And you are supporting this. So if you had a site and said something 4Chan did not like and they attacked your site you wouldn't be pissed and want to take them down? Seriously Anon has decided to go after someone who has A LOT of resources and money he is not going to go down without a fight.TechNoFear said:'tops 2 thousand'? Please at least try to keep your hyperbole under control (it was considerably more than 2,000).Krion_Vark said:So saying that every college kid that used the service when it first came out as well as the people who created it right when it first came out would have amounted to what? tops 2 thousand?
Metallica named 335,435 people for uploading their music to Napster (so you could assume an order of magnitude more downloaded).
BTW.
My response was to you saying that Simmons had not provoked this attack, when clearly his statements a few weeks ago precipitated annon's actions (and Simmons further comments are designed to keep the publicity rolling in...)
I think it will be interesting to see how this plays out. I can't imagine /b/ ever giving up and there are far too many of them from all across to ever take them all down. Gene Simmons will get a lot more then he bargained for.