Ah. Now I know.FalloutJack said:Okay, I hate to explain the joke, but let's go.
One explanation later . . .
Formica Archonis said:I would, but now he's telling me I'm remembering things wrong. He's gone from editing the DVDs to wanting to edit the neurons in my head. I'm sorry, but this "Ministry of Truth, Skywalker Ranch division" garbage has to stop.Nigh Invulnerable said:I'm really tired of the debate about this. Just enjoy whichever version of the film you prefer, people! Let George go off and do whatever he wants with his franchise.
The hell of it is I didn't see a Star Wars movie until I was in my 20's. He didn't destroy my childhood. My dislike for him is more for his excessive use of Hollywood Truth ("What I just said is truth and how dare you remember what I said yesterday.") - there is nothing I hate with deeper and more abiding passion than a self-superior hypocrite.soren7550 said:
Nonsense, the Firefly die-hards occasionally have valid pointsZhukov said:Are people still going on about this?
Christ, it's worse than the Firefly die-hards.
Move on.
I'd say less competent. I mean, he missed a stationary target from a foot away.Turbowombat said:I'm really sick of this trope because the edit literally did nothing to change the character of Han Solo. Look at the time differential, it's under half a second between shots in the current form which means Han was NOT reacting to being shot at. He made the decision to shoot without knowing he was being shot at. Same character, not self defense. The only difference is now Greedo is halfway competent at his job. I like a character with competent villains.
im a little confused. how is that different from what i said?FelixG said:Actually, you should watch the scene again. He doesn't dodge, he twitches away from where the laser blast hit on the wall. Greedo was off by about 6 inches before Han even moved, and he moved AFTER the blast hit, showing he just has good reflexes.