It's a good comparison imo. Both are instances where something which causes no harm to another person is made illegal. (Obviously I'm referring to virtual child porn here, not actually harming children). There should be no law which restricts peoples freedom to engage in activities that cause no harm to other people.rossatdi said:Whoa, I certainly hope this doesn't take effect.
What a massive step backwards for a Western country. I hate the "drugs & child pornography" comparison. I mean, really? Really!?!
Well, lets hope sanity prevails before they start burningbooksgames.
Btw, is there a name for this sort of political opinion? I would like to get in touch with other people who feel the same way.
Liberalism is too general, is there something more specific?