I'd say most men do, but a vast majority of them are not exclusively large breast lovers.Espionage Caterpillar post=9.71383.729111 said:congrats to those males who pointed out that not all men love huge breasts. We knew you were out there somewhere.
No, I wasn't agreeing with you. That really is the funniest thing I have ever heard. But to avoid getting myself banned from these nice forums, I'm just going to restrain my part in the subject to that pleasant acknowledgment of my amusement in the matter.Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.729150 said:Thanks! It's kinda like a corporation: we don't call them 'minority shareholders' because it's a group with fewer people; we call them 'minority shareholders' because the shares they hold--i.e. their power and influence over the company--are fewer.DeadlyFred post=9.71383.729100 said:That is quite possibly the funniest thing I have ever heard.Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.728683 said:Yup. They have the minority share of power and influence.
Think of it as Coke and Pepsi. Sure everyone says they have a preference, but at the end of the day you'll takeUltrajoe post=9.71383.729154 said:So, i like big boobs, but i'm sure as hell as much as a fan of a b-cup as a pair of DD's...
That was a terrible joke. But I applaud your bravery for making it.Ultrajoe post=9.71383.729154 said:Some Cunning Linguistics go a long way.
I've heard the quote, but not that analogy, it extracted a chuckle.Espionage Caterpillar post=9.71383.729173 said:Lol. Someone wise once said "it's not the size of your equipment but what you do with it". I don't know who that was, so maybe it was me... Nevertheless, if said equipment is attached to an asshole, it doesn't matter what size it is because sensible women won't spend any time on it, excuse the pun.
Easy tiger, thems fightin' words and this is not a thread for the fightin'Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.729178 said:I know--I was just giving you a chance to walk away gracefully before showing you that the 'how can they be a minority if there are more of them' is a completely silly, incredibly stupid argument that is only made by bigots not actually interested in the discussion of the subject but only in promoting their own ignorance.
Debate is not unlawful here, feel free to rip into one another without fear of moderator wrath, provided it's kept civil and on-topic.DeadlyFred post=9.71383.729186 said:Oh I'd be plenty interested in discussing such topics on a place not under moderator rule, but under the circumstances, no thanks. And since I did actually refrain from citing any specific reasons for my statements, kindly restrict yourself to posting your own opinions, not assuming mine.
I'm not really interested in being baited into an argument, either. I know you are well aware what happens when people start discussing controversial views on internet forums, and given your demeanor in the matter, I can only think that would make it all the worse.Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.729193 said:It should be a thread for discussion, though, and DeadlyFred is clearly not interested in a discussion. This thread is for people with differing opinions to debate them with each other, and clearly isn't for someone that will ask a question like 'how can they be a minority if there are more than them' and steamroll through an explanation like 'for the same reason we call thousands of people minority shareholders if there's even just one person with >50 percent of the voting stock.'
Just because a troll has decided to build a toll booth on the bridge instead of climbing out from underneath it, that doesn't mean they're any less a troll. A slightly more polite troll, but a troll nonetheless. It just means they're pretending to be a legitimate bridge custodian/thread participant hoping people won't notice.
If i may suggest, this helps nothing for either of you. Restraint is the measure of a man, not ability.DeadlyFred post=9.71383.729202 said:You can go right ahead and climb down off your little happy high horse before you do as well.