Girl Gamer's Opinion

Recommended Videos

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
Espionage Caterpillar post=9.71383.729111 said:
congrats to those males who pointed out that not all men love huge breasts. We knew you were out there somewhere.
I'd say most men do, but a vast majority of them are not exclusively large breast lovers.

However, much like the women who are more than happy with an average penis, they are far from the stereotypical wants that the other sex picks up.

So, i like big boobs, but i'm sure as hell as much as a fan of a b-cup as a pair of DD's... But because of our society, the b-cup part gets ignored. Trust us ladies, it often comes across the same way for cocks, now i know for a fact that it does not take a monster to please a lady (The Joe Is Not Ultra Everywhere, Punters, And If You Quote This Outside Of This Thread I Will Kill You), and the vast majority of women don't care about it.

But to a growing lad, thats not what he hears and learns, especially if porn is his teacher. Oh, there are women who wont accept a certain penis size, but like guys who won't date a woman without back strain, they tend to be assholes anyway.

The point of this little diversion?

To reassure women everywhere of the following; Men do love big breasts, but lets face it, we love smaller ones too. Its just out of habit that we praise the big ones more, because they do flip a switch inside of us that just screams 'want'... but trust us, it's never the deciding factor on a woman, and if it is he's an asshole and not worth your time...

And partly, to reassure any man out there with a little less in the pants, that what you can do is by no means in proportion to what you've got. Some Cunning Linguistics go a long way.
 

DeadlyFred

New member
Aug 13, 2008
305
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.729150 said:
DeadlyFred post=9.71383.729100 said:
Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.728683 said:
Yup. They have the minority share of power and influence.
That is quite possibly the funniest thing I have ever heard.
Thanks! It's kinda like a corporation: we don't call them 'minority shareholders' because it's a group with fewer people; we call them 'minority shareholders' because the shares they hold--i.e. their power and influence over the company--are fewer.
No, I wasn't agreeing with you. That really is the funniest thing I have ever heard. But to avoid getting myself banned from these nice forums, I'm just going to restrain my part in the subject to that pleasant acknowledgment of my amusement in the matter.
 
Aug 8, 2008
17
0
0
Lol. Someone wise once said "it's not the size of your equipment but what you do with it". I don't know who that was, so maybe it was me... Nevertheless, if said equipment is attached to an asshole, it doesn't matter what size it is because sensible women won't spend any time on it, excuse the pun.
 

Brett Alex

New member
Jul 22, 2008
1,397
0
0
Ultrajoe post=9.71383.729154 said:
So, i like big boobs, but i'm sure as hell as much as a fan of a b-cup as a pair of DD's...
Think of it as Coke and Pepsi. Sure everyone says they have a preference, but at the end of the day you'll take whatever is cheapest whatever you can get your hands on first.
Ultrajoe post=9.71383.729154 said:
Some Cunning Linguistics go a long way.
That was a terrible joke. But I applaud your bravery for making it.

Oh and the whole actual serious point of your post that I have cleverly avoided was very good as well.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
Espionage Caterpillar post=9.71383.729173 said:
Lol. Someone wise once said "it's not the size of your equipment but what you do with it". I don't know who that was, so maybe it was me... Nevertheless, if said equipment is attached to an asshole, it doesn't matter what size it is because sensible women won't spend any time on it, excuse the pun.
I've heard the quote, but not that analogy, it extracted a chuckle.

Trust us, its the same with boobs, even the firmest, biggest, perfectest boobs around can't compensate for being attached to a *****.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.729178 said:
I know--I was just giving you a chance to walk away gracefully before showing you that the 'how can they be a minority if there are more of them' is a completely silly, incredibly stupid argument that is only made by bigots not actually interested in the discussion of the subject but only in promoting their own ignorance.
Easy tiger, thems fightin' words and this is not a thread for the fightin'
 

DeadlyFred

New member
Aug 13, 2008
305
0
0
Oh I'd be plenty interested in discussing such topics on a place not under moderator rule, but under the circumstances, no thanks. And since I did actually refrain from citing any specific reasons for my statements, kindly restrict yourself to posting your own opinions, not assuming mine.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
DeadlyFred post=9.71383.729186 said:
Oh I'd be plenty interested in discussing such topics on a place not under moderator rule, but under the circumstances, no thanks. And since I did actually refrain from citing any specific reasons for my statements, kindly restrict yourself to posting your own opinions, not assuming mine.
Debate is not unlawful here, feel free to rip into one another without fear of moderator wrath, provided it's kept civil and on-topic.

But don't, this is neither the time or the place.
 

DeadlyFred

New member
Aug 13, 2008
305
0
0
Cheeze_Pavilion post=9.71383.729193 said:
It should be a thread for discussion, though, and DeadlyFred is clearly not interested in a discussion. This thread is for people with differing opinions to debate them with each other, and clearly isn't for someone that will ask a question like 'how can they be a minority if there are more than them' and steamroll through an explanation like 'for the same reason we call thousands of people minority shareholders if there's even just one person with >50 percent of the voting stock.'

Just because a troll has decided to build a toll booth on the bridge instead of climbing out from underneath it, that doesn't mean they're any less a troll. A slightly more polite troll, but a troll nonetheless. It just means they're pretending to be a legitimate bridge custodian/thread participant hoping people won't notice.
I'm not really interested in being baited into an argument, either. I know you are well aware what happens when people start discussing controversial views on internet forums, and given your demeanor in the matter, I can only think that would make it all the worse.

If you'd like to continue that specific vein of discussion you can feel free to send me a PM but I'm not going to let it turn into the inevitable furball it would on an open forum. You can go right ahead and climb down off your little happy high horse before you do as well.
 

Ultrajoe

Omnichairman
Apr 24, 2008
4,719
0
0
DeadlyFred post=9.71383.729202 said:
You can go right ahead and climb down off your little happy high horse before you do as well.
If i may suggest, this helps nothing for either of you. Restraint is the measure of a man, not ability.

Right now, i am measuring really fucking huge in restraint.