...What?.Saladfork said:Human life doesn't have anything that makes it valuable. That's why the only way it can have value is if it has some intrinsically.sumanoskae said:Not true, objectivity is undeniable fact, as in it is literally impossible for anyone thinking clearly and acting honestly to argue against it.Saladfork said:There is one thing that has objective value: Human life. Everybody values their lives, and value of things like food and water derive from value of life.sumanoskae said:The world and all that it encompasses have no intrinsic, objective value. The only value that exists is purely subjective. Humans(And maybe other animals) invented the very idea of "Value".
1: If I asked what made human life valuable, what would you say?.
2: Not everyone does, many people such as criminals, psychopaths, manic depressives, politicians, Michael Atkinson, etc, don't place any inherent value on human life.
If everyone just agrees on something, that doesn't make it an objective fact, it's just united subjectivity, many different perspectives that happen to agree.
Humans are wired to survive, so of course they FEEL that they're life is important, but that doesn't mean that that viewpoint makes any kind of sense, that they can present undeniable evidence that life not only can be but SHOULD be preserved.
Fire is hot, that's a fact, regardless of who you are or what you think, fire will still cause you to ignite. How would you argue an exclusively human concern to an entity that wasn't human?, how would you ascertain that their argument was inferior to your own?.
And perhaps I should have elaborated, but I meant every human being's own life has intrinsic value, meaning that everybody values their own life.
As for why I specifically said human life, other animals are unable to articulate thoughts about worth and value.
There's nothing to make life valuable so therefore it has to be?.
Isn't it more likely that it just doesn't have any at all?.
Something having intrinsic value doesn't mean everybody values it, it means that any conscious creature perceiving it has no way of arguing against it's worth. It's is objective and self evident.
The very question "What is the meaning of life?" is illogical, one might as well ask "What is the agenda of comatose?".
Life is a state of being, not an entity or singular creation in possession of the conscious mind needed to communicate some sort of message or operate under an agenda. Furthermore, even if you believe in God, then you would also have to prove that God's point of view was logical.
For something to be purely reasonable it has to perfectly explain itself without reverting to circular logic or self evidence, which do not work because they refer back to a point that has already been contested.
Human beings valuing human life doesn't mean anything, they wouldn't have survived if they didn't. That doesn't mean that they're right, that they're point of view is objective. Being logical means you have to ignore your biases and emotional connections for the sake of argument, and without subjective human(Or otherwise) perception, the galaxy would be nothing more then a sea of randomly connected atoms, an endless sea shapes shadows.
Value doesn't exist anywhere except in our minds, by definition. It's a construct to keep us alive. Therefore it is purely subjective, therefore it is intangible, therefore it is not objective.
P.S: I could go on to say that not all humans value their own lives, but saying that was important would be missing the point.