Puppies are savage beasts that will brutally murder smaller animals for FUN as they grow older unless they are kept in strict discipline by a human being! Labeling something as cute when they're eating a squirrel's entrails is not very easy.Dirty Hipsters said:Puppies, they are adorable.
I DARE you to argue against that.
*cracks knuckles*
I don't wear pants if I can possibly help it and I come up with better ideas by hitting my head until bad ones start to make sense.Ordinaryundone said:I think you are a gentleman and a scholar!
*sniff* And a kindred soul to boot!Saladfork said:I don't wear pants if I can possibly help it and I come up with better ideas by hitting my head until bad ones start to make sense.Ordinaryundone said:I think you are a gentleman and a scholar!
So I disagree.
Perhaps I can't, but my cat can!Marter said:It is my belief that you can argue against me.
I think it's quite obvious that this thread is one of the most pointless wastes of time on the Escapist. There are few things less fulfilling than reading the pointless drivel of a moron who gets his cat to argue for him to avoid paradoxes.ZombieMonkey7 said:This thread is a brilliant masterpiece.
Second!!ZombieMonkey7 said:This thread is a brilliant masterpiece.
You still lose our thread based on your initial premise.Saladfork said:Perhaps I can't, but my cat can!
kotghfd bxctryhj45eqwzs
Take that!
Doesn't this apply to everybody?Saladfork said:I don't wear pants if I can possibly help it
The Pauli Exclusion principle may explain certain phenomena, but so do wizards. Without the tools to inspect the universe at a subatomic level, called it accurate is premature.joe-h2o said:The Pauli Exclusion Principle is an excellent and accurate description of the way electrons behave in orbitals, presupposing that the orbital model exists....
I refer you to my previous cat argument.ErrorCode1337 said:I think you will be able to successfully argue any post made here.