Kwil said:
andrat said:
Global Warming
That's a good song. But on topic, I think it's bullshit. Our summer has been so on and off so far, it's messed. I know it effects people towards the equator more than us in the north, but still, I would expect that we get a bit of heat
It's called "Global Warming" not "Andrat's Neighborhood Warming"
IF IT'S GLOBAL WARMING
Then it should also effect Andrat's neighbour hood.
IDIOT
Sisyphus0 said:
Climate change isn't up for debate, it is supported by the majority of data. While we aren't 'causing it' we are exacerbating the natural heating and cooling cycles. Denying climate change is basically admitting you have no place in a scientific world and could barely pass a high school science course.
WE ARE NOT DENIING THE EXISTANCE CLIMATE CHANGE!
WE ARE DENIING THE THEORY ANPHROPIC GLOBAL WARMING!
Besides.
The climate changes 4 times a year.
Chris H said:
crazyhaircut94 said:
Haven't cared enough since I don't believe in it. I think that we haven't solved the riddle yet. We've just thrown out hundreds of theories, with only one that's correct. Or maybe none of them at all, for that matter.
1) Theory: In science that word does not work the way you?re using it. The theory of X is something that has stood up to repeated testing and has shown an ability to model what is happening and usually can be used to make predictions on future data.
2) There will be many many elements causing anything, since the world is amazingly complex ? however the models being used for research into climate change try to take that into account and still a high 99 percent of climatologists think that the climate change difference from previous cooling/heating cycles is caused by man. They may be debating the details underneath that umbrella but the consensus is pretty clear.
Chris H
No
There called Bullshitoligist.
Besides, how do you know that's what they actually think?
Have you read there mind?
Maybe you asked them personally.
If you did ask them, then how did you know that they aren't idiots?
Also remember.
What one gains in inteligence, they lose in common scense.
ON ANOTHER HAND
A HIGH 1 PERCENT OF CLIMATOLOGIST think that it's a scam.
Remember.
SCIENCE ISN'T A DEMOCRASY
SakSak said:
Okay, so I'm wrong.
BUT despite everything you copied and pasted, if you multiply those 130-230 teragrams of CO2 by the billions of years this planet has existed, it far outweighs what humans have produced since the industrial revolution 150 years ago. And that doesn't included the dirt kicked up by meteors hitting the surface of the planet, or the ash from the numerous wild fires that naturally occur every year.
The problem is, the climate change wasn't as radical millions of years ago.... The change is happening
now[/quote]
It was that radical.
In fact.
The start of the ice ages were alot more radical then the warming we are having now.
You know what?
I agree with you...
The earth is warming...
By NEGATIVE 2 degrees centergrate.
Then again... Negative 2 degreas warmer is also 2 degreas colder.
Lonan said:
Might I ask what you think the reason is that Al Gore made up global warming? Why the UN creating an intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and why all the world leaders just met for a big climate change conference to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions? What would be the purpose of doing all this if it's not true? Do you really think that all the world leaders have been brainwashed by Al Gore into thinking that global warming is true, when in fact it's a fabrication?
1. Al Gore didn't make up global warming. He picked it up and ran.
2. Not all the world leaders were at the IPCC. There was the leader of the CZECH republic.
3. The purpose would be to gain power/money or to destroy the western world. Another reason is that there is no purpose, as they sincearly believe it's true and thus destroy thier own economies.
4. No. The leader of the Czech republic wasn't brainwashed.
4.5. You really over estimate the world leaders, they are corrupt, idiots, dick heads or all the above.