Awesome! I've yet to run into any problems with GOG but it's nice to see that they're doing this. Now we just need Steam to do it.
If you like your RTS's then Total Annihilation is a solid gold classic. Think Supreme Commander 5 years early.Grimh said:I need to support GoG more... Anyone want to recommend a game I should buy right now?
There's a tonne of classic RPGs if you are into that sort of thing and don't already own them. Fallouts, Planescape, Baldur's Gates, System Shock 2, Deus Ex. You even get a discount for the overall series if you buy them together.Grimh said:I need to support GoG more... Anyone want to recommend a game I should buy right now?
If you like strategy king of dragon pass is pretty cool. It's really unusual but fun.Grimh said:A very cynical person would expect assholes to try and abuse this, as would a very optimistic person.
Because this is the internet.
I need to support GoG more... Anyone want to recommend a game I should buy right now?
I recommend Outlast if you haven't got it yet and like horror games. Really the first horror in a while that 'rustled my jimmies'Grimh said:A very cynical person would expect assholes to try and abuse this, as would a very optimistic person.
Because this is the internet.
I need to support GoG more... Anyone want to recommend a game I should buy right now?
Wouldnt that only apply to the EU though?McKitten said:Now, i don't want to rain on the parade here, GOG is absolutely the most customer friendly publisher and distributor in the business, but the reason for this is probably not just that they're actively working on being customer-friendly. GOG, being head-quartered in the EU, and doing business in the EU is actually required by law to provide refunds within 14 days of purchase, for any stated reason even. The EU law applies to all internet (or phone/mail) based consumer sales within the EU. And before anyone comes claiming that software is a service where this doesn't apply, some companies have actually tried that argument in court, and EU courts so far always thrown that out, ruling that a product doesn't change into a service simply because the seller claims so.
Still, even if they're just doing what they're legally required to, it's pretty good to see they're actually willing to do it, and capitalize on that, instead of trying to get away with less, as so many of the scum-bags in the business do.
I second this. while I suck at rts, I find total annihilation to be a fun game while having trouble with medium difficulty AI.Rob Robson said:Total AnnihilationGrimh said:A very cynical person would expect assholes to try and abuse this, as would a very optimistic person.
Because this is the internet.
I need to support GoG more... Anyone want to recommend a game I should buy right now?
Played that game to death when I was... what? 11. Got some fond memories of that game bugging out and nuking myself lol.wombat_of_war said:are you me from the past? ive never met another person who has heard of it let alone played and loved itHaakmed said:Hey thats cool....now where is Starship Troopers: Terran Ascendancy? I would not be sad if you charged me 40 bucks for that game.
Same thing in Australia, if a product doesn't work out of the box then we are entitled to a full refund regardless of what the shoddy EULA says. Funny thing is a few games I've purchased have actually had a sticker on the back saying to ignore the EULA as Australian law overrides it. Heck even the EULA's now seem to recognise this as when I read the PS4's and got to the arbitration part it said that it was only American users that were affected, apparently the rest of the world says no to those clauses.McKitten said:Now, i don't want to rain on the parade here, GOG is absolutely the most customer friendly publisher and distributor in the business, but the reason for this is probably not just that they're actively working on being customer-friendly. GOG, being head-quartered in the EU, and doing business in the EU is actually required by law to provide refunds within 14 days of purchase, for any stated reason even. The EU law applies to all internet (or phone/mail) based consumer sales within the EU. And before anyone comes claiming that software is a service where this doesn't apply, some companies have actually tried that argument in court, and EU courts so far always thrown that out, ruling that a product doesn't change into a service simply because the seller claims so.
Still, even if they're just doing what they're legally required to, it's pretty good to see they're actually willing to do it, and capitalize on that, instead of trying to get away with less, as so many of the scum-bags in the business do.
Isalan said:-snip
Knight Captain Kerr said:-snipsnip
Amaror said:-snippety
Rob Robson said:-snip again
Thanks everyone, I think I'll get Dungeon Keeper for now but I'll keep the others in mind for future splurging.Clowndoe said:-snip
The EU law goes further than just legally required warranty (which has a minimum term of 2 years here). The 2-week refund right is for any and all online/mail/phone purchases, with no reasons given. Basically, if someone sells you something that you can't immediately touch and take home, you've got the right to simply change your mind (as long as you do it within the first two weeks). It's simply considered a part of fair business practices, and if sellers don't like that, they're free to open a real shop and stop selling products online.RicoADF said:Same thing in Australia, if a product doesn't work out of the box then we are entitled to a full refund regardless of what the shoddy EULA says. Funny thing is a few games I've purchased have actually had a sticker on the back saying to ignore the EULA as Australian law overrides it. Heck even the EULA's now seem to recognise this as when I read the PS4's and got to the arbitration part it said that it was only American users that were affected, apparently the rest of the world says no to those clauses.
Over here the law doesn't give a time limit, rather it says that the item must not fail/be faulty within a reasonable expected time frame. So in other words if a $2 kids toy dies a year from purchase it's not covered but a $20000 new car would be expected to work for 5 years without major fault (normal wear and tear/damage caused by driver obviously exempted).McKitten said:The EU law goes further than just legally required warranty (which has a minimum term of 2 years here). The 2-week refund right is for any and all online/mail/phone purchases, with no reasons given. Basically, if someone sells you something that you can't immediately touch and take home, you've got the right to simply change your mind (as long as you do it within the first two weeks). It's simply considered a part of fair business practices, and if sellers don't like that, they're free to open a real shop and stop selling products online.
And yeah, the arbitration clauses are usually hilarious. So some legal beagle in some gaming company thinks he can add a clause to a EULA that will tell a foreign court whether or not they have jurisdiction over complaints filed by their own citizens? I wish you good luck with that.
(Reminds me of an attempted court case in germany, in the early days of piracy-trolling. Some joker brought a lawsuit against anonymous in a couple thousand cases in front of the supreme court, just listing a bunch IP addresses, and expecting the court to do all the ground work for him. The reply basically translated to: "Cut that shit out, and if you ever waste our time like that again we'll fine the living hell out of your Law Firm"
The big problem with the quite adequate consumer protection laws in the EU is that companies like Valve get away with breaking them at will, because people would have to sue them. And sue them for every instance, there is no provision that punishments get harsher if a company violated the same law a couple hundred times already. So it's a basic numbers game. Compare the profit for every time they break the law with the percentage of people that actually sue (and the cost of that) and that gives the cost/benefit ratio of breaking the law again. Unfortunately, it's usually very profitable to keep breaking the law and absorbing the (small) fines for the very low percentage of lawsuits that actually happen. (And it's not just media companies doing this)