Gogogic CEO Says Single-Player is a "Gimmick"

samahain

New member
Sep 23, 2010
78
0
0
Having to explain yourself in another instance is a cheap way of obtaining more time on the soap box.

It also indicates BAD COMMUNICATION SKILLS. A condition seemingly frequent among people whose job description states "Good/excellent comunication skills".
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
If anything when I play an MMO I think to myself "Damn, this would be so much more fun if all these other people weren't getting in my goddamned way."
 

DirgeNovak

I'm anticipating DmC. Flame me.
Jul 23, 2008
1,645
0
0
1: Who the fuck are you?
2: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
3: *walks away*

KeyMaster45 said:
If anything when I play an MMO I think to myself "Damn, this would be so much more fun if all these other people weren't getting in my goddamned way."
Also this.
 

Do4600

New member
Oct 16, 2007
934
0
0
That's funny, I think Gogogic is a gimmick, no wait, that's not the right word, what's that word for a phrase with a comical ending? That's right a JOKE.
 

Vicarious Reality

New member
Jul 10, 2011
1,398
0
0


I play like three games online, Wow, Eve and Cs
Though i might check that DayZ thing out

I have 83 games on Steam and several moving boxes full of tangible games
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
I can see where he is coming from, but i disagree with him. Its like saying that watching a movie alone is a gimmick. yes first real games were made for multiplayer. that does not totally remove singleplayer games legality. by that logic, any 3d game is a gimmic, because first there was 2d ones. He has his opinion and unlike many other CEO hes done at least basic research so hes already above average, but he is sitll wrong.
I think there are two type of games: singlepalyer and multiplayer.
Singleplayer i play only singleplayer and never even look at multiplayer.
multiplayer are what we call MMOs now.

I play like three games online, Wow, Eve and Cs
Id never though id see a person that liked wow and eve and CS at the same time. the three are like the worst enemies.
 

chikusho

New member
Jun 14, 2011
873
0
0
Printed books for personal reading are a gimmick - stories are meant to be told to groups of others.
The stories were designed by travelling storytellers that would tell stories they had learned and made up by campfires or in city streets, but when printing technology became a thing there was a need to construct a narrative structure for commercial purposes. You couldn't depend on people coming together to have a synchronous experience over a story. That would have simply stifled sales. And since there was no reasonable way to connect people in other ways - the theatre was the only serious attempt - it became an industry need to project the book as the storyteller.
 

Damien Granz

New member
Apr 8, 2011
143
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Gogogic CEO Says Single-Player is a "Gimmick"


The CEO of social gaming company Gogogic says that games are naturally meant to be played with others.

Reykjavik-based Gogogic specializes in casual and social gaming, so it does have a certain bias about how people play games, but even so these comments by CEO Jonan Antonsson are a little extreme. In a recent interview, he effectively dismissed single-player gaming, saying that while there's a "strong audience for hard and unrelenting games" like Demon's Souls, games are meant first and foremost to be played with others.

"The single player mechanic is a gimmick - games are meant to be played with others and it doesn't matter if it's in-person or online," Antonsson said. "The first games were designed as multiplayer experiences, but when computer and console games became a thing there was a need to construct an antagonist and/or a protagonist for commercial purposes. You couldn't depend on people coming together to have a synchronous experience over a game. That would have simply stifled sales. And since there was no reasonable way to connect people in other ways - the arcade was the only serious attempt - it became an industry need to project the game as the other player."

"Playing a game is a multiplayer activity and can easily be seen as such when you watch young toddlers play by themselves," he added. "They invent someone to play with, someone that they talk to and interact with."

I can see where he's coming from - historically, especially as children, people have played with others - but videogames have changed the definition of "play." You don't read multiplayer books, after all, and listening to music or watching television isn't an inherently social activity either. Antonsson hedged his bet somewhat by stating that even something as simple as a high score list is enough to make a game social and "transform it to an asynchronous multiplayer experience," but he then went on to restate his belief that single-player experiences are becoming largely irrelevant to anyone outside a very niche audience.

"Now we can connect people in and around a game through real time PvP and PvE mechanics and the need for pure single player games had gone down. We have multiple plots and stories and build the meta-experience for the entire audience. The premise for making games has changed - reverted back to building multiplayer experiences that are true to the game form," he said. "This doesn't mean that we have run out of room when it comes to great single-player titles or games that make you sweat and curse every couple of minutes. It means that those titles have to be very appealing and cater well to the hardcore audience."

Source: the [a]list daily [http://www.thealistdaily.com/news/exclusive-gogogic-on-branded-games-accessibility-and-more/]
Permalink
And despite that I'm watching the death of the MMO and most muliplayer experience that aren't 'social' single player games like Farmville.

I'm not going to say multiplayer games are a gimmick but I will say that now's not the best time to try to say the MMO is the wave of the future...
 

BrionJames

New member
Jul 8, 2009
540
0
0
who gives a shit what this asshole thinks anyways? This stupid dick is entitled to his opinion, but I find it hard to believe that strictly single player games are a gimmick. Given such masterpieces as Planescape: Torment, Baldur's Gate I&II, and the Fallout series as well as the TES games. All fucking great games that you don't play with anyone else.
 

Catrixa

New member
May 21, 2011
209
0
0
Urgh. Single player is a gimmick in the same way some movie genres are a gimmick. Romantic comedies are no more likely to be phased out because summer action movies exist than quality single player experiences are because multiplayer games exist. I personally believe this is because there are some experiences that cannot be recreated in multiplayer (and if you're the developer who can convert Amnesia to a multiplayer experience while still keeping the same atmosphere, your talents would be better served curing cancer and AIDS, because you are a fucking genius). So, if single player is going to be phased out like any other gimmick, it'll be time to relinquish that old argument of "games are art," because art stops when creativity dies.
 

zerobudgetgamer

New member
Apr 5, 2011
297
0
0
Here we have a man who has no real knowledge of video game history.

Multiplayer may be popular now, but it can never trump a quality single player experience. And as for other "games" being invented with multiplayer in mind, allow me to point out that just about every game out there, barring perhaps board games, has a single player equivalent that is played just as often as it's multiplayer equivalent.