I'm not sure what to say, since browsing with mouse gestures is as fundamental to me as having a mouse wheel or having tabs in my browser. It would be like someone from 2001 saying "mouse wheel and tabs sound unbelievable minor, I mean, no one I know use them that much." In his own way he would be right, these are minor improvements to the browsing experience and most people are very crude in the way they use computers.Snowalker said:I don't personally use mouse gestures, but I can. I didn't realize I downloaded a plug-in if I did. But that seems unbelievably minor, I mean, no one I know use mouse gestures that much, and as personal opinion, I'd rather be able to down load the things I see as necessary than have a huge download thats full of shit I'll never use.isometry said:Last time I tried using Mouse Gestures in Chrome in required a plug-in, and the responsiveness was too low. Do you use mouse gestures for back, forward, new tab, close tab, etc?Snowalker said:I'm confused, if Opera is so much better, why does it seem to fall behind Chrome in simple tests
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/the-big-browser-benchmark-chrome-15-vs-opera-11-vs-ie9-vs-firefox-8-vs-safari-5/16041?pg=6&tag=content;siu-container
Can someone explain?
and apparently the one that truly sucks is safari.
Opera invented mouse gestures and still does them best last I checked, but maybe Chrome has made a better copy by now. Opera has a lot of default features, so I'm not used to digging through plug-ins.
The difference is .46 actually, and i didn't use a calculator.Greg Tito said:Well, perhaps not exactly firmly. Chrome holds a slim lead with 25.69 percent of internet denizens using Google's slim browser, while Firefox is used by 25.23 percent - a difference of just .43 percent for those of you too lazy to pop open a calculator.
It's because Chrome is newer (early adopter Google "beta" crowd) and has more marketing (hell, they have TV commercials here). Chrome is fine, but outside of some sloppy addons in Firefox causing memory leakage, it certainly doesn't offer much extra as a "beta"/random forced release product that make me want to give up what works. At best for me, it would be on par, slightly faster, quirkier rendering, and (currently) less extensibility then what I get out of Firefox.GonzoGamer said:Is that because Chrome is getting tight or because Firefox is turning to crap?
Johnson McGee said:Recently I've begun to notice that firefox has been taking longer and longer to start up and eats up huge amounts of ram. The only thing keeping me away from Chrome is a distrust of google's privacy morals.
I'm averse to Google becoming the next Microsoft as well. Give Opera a try if you want a break from FF, it's the source of Chrome's "inspiration" anyway.crystalsnow said:Anyways, I've been noticing FF's lack of innovation and improvement lately, but I still refuse to join up with Google's quest for world domination.
They want people to move on from Windows XP. It's dated, and Windows 7 was/is a good enough OS to replace it.esperandote said:The difference is .46 actually, and i didn't use a calculator.Greg Tito said:Well, perhaps not exactly firmly. Chrome holds a slim lead with 25.69 percent of internet denizens using Google's slim browser, while Firefox is used by 25.23 percent - a difference of just .43 percent for those of you too lazy to pop open a calculator.
I work in a technical supporte related job and i cant believe how many people use IE6 and the technicians that after installing Windows XP don't upgrade the browser.
That site about eliminating IE6 mentions that they want everybody using IE9, too bad it doesn't work on XP.
Nor did i.Mestraal said:Regardless, I'll never really understand the IE hate.