Well, to work within your example, there's a difference between you immediately blurting out that you hate broccoli when someone so much as mentions it, and someone questioning you when they see you avoid broccoli. Are you supposed to lie? In my example, these people would see that you didn't order broccoli or that you avoid broccoli and would take it upon themselves to question you until you admit that you don't like broccoli, and then they would proceed to tell you that you're wrong for not liking broccoli. Does that make sense?Friv said:
I'm not saying that all liberals or democrats do this. The ratio of these progressive loonies to normal liberals is probably similar to the ratio between Westboro Baptist Church members to normal christian conservatives. There are more than a few Christians who personally don't approve of homosexuality, but also don't take this as an excuse to go around harassing gay people. What I'm saying is that both sides have overly intrusive assholes that like to involve themselves in other people's personal affairs.
Let's put it this way: a group of people are standing outside somewhere with a petition. As you walk by they ask you to sign it and you refuse. They then start following you (let's say the mall is pretty empty) and they ask you why you don't want to sign it, and when you continue to refuse they suggest that you're something bad for not wanting to sign it. That's what I call being an intrusive wanker. My point is that this sort of thing has been done by both sides of the political spectrum.
