GTA4 graphics wtf?

Recommended Videos

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
First of all im not a fanboy. I have a pc,360 and ps3. Im just saying that the sixaxis is once again useless and the shoulder buttons are shit. The xbox version is the best because of no stupid controls and exclusive dlc. Is that enough evidence for you?
How could u bring Sixaxis into it, u dont even use Sixaxis in GTA4, the shoulder buttons have no problems and the controls are better on the PS3, so dont chat shit and as for the DLC, no big loss, it is only a matter of time before the PS3 goes beyond everything in the console market, so MS can just waste money trying to secure exclusive DLC.
I know he said it first, but which controls are better are simply a matter of opinion. I myself hate the new PS3 controller, and would much rather use the PS2 one, but it's still better than the old xBox controller, boy I hated that thing.
Personally, I think the PC's controls are better, but that's just because I hate using console controllers to play games.

I'd like to know what you think the PS3 is going to kill the 360 with(well sort of, since I'm really quite frankly mutual in the area).
Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, MAG, Infamous, God Of War 3 and a few more exclusives planned that I cant think of at the moment. Also, I aint arguing, but why do alot of people like the PC controls???
See, I thought you meant they had some special accessory planned, those games do look kick ass though.
It's a fair question, personally, I like the PC's controls better because I prefer fast accuracy(I can Headshot a person faster in GTA: IV with a mouse, than they can bodyshot me with an controller). It's mostly the mouse, but the keyboard is special in that you have so many mappable commands, so close together.
Controllers clearly have the low down on the PC when it comes to things like racing games(I'm talking basic controller vs keyboard/mouse), but racing games aren't as frequently visted in my game library, so meh.
I never got the point of using a mouse to play games, I think it should always be a controller and using a keyboard and having commands close together, does it matter because the buttons are just as close together on the controller as it is a keyboard, also racing games suck, the last good one was Need For Speed Most Wanted.
 

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
 

BolognaBaloney

New member
Mar 17, 2009
2,672
0
0
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
Ps3 may be the most powerful, but since they cant get people to take the much needed time to make games properly for it, then your stuck with a console that is too expensive to make games for; which is the main reason that the price of the console has stayed high. Also there is no noticeable graphical difference in 360 or ps3, I know you'll say it displays truer tones or such, but when you come down to it, if you saw someone playing fallout 3, or gta 4 or such, you could tell simply from the visuals.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,308
0
0
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
Simply that GTA IV would be much better on the Sega Genesis with the addons than PS3 or 360, when you attached all the genesis addons it needed 3 power supplies making it much more powerful than any system. Just do the math, PS3 and 360 have one power supply each, Genesis+32x+Sega CD has three. That's beyond any systems power requirements, even the coleco vision who's power supply weighs like 3 pounds.

Whoops sorry do the math is an atari jaguar thing, I meant welcome to the next level.
 

Theo Samaritan

New member
Jul 16, 2008
1,382
0
0
kwdav said:
Theo Samaritan said:
Patch it up to the latest version, and...

Read the game requirements before you buy one and ***** about how it wont run.

Remember, recommended settings = required settings on pretty much every game released. Bare this in mind.
thats an insult i read the requirements and by all logic my pc should have been handling it well and yes i realise everyone else is being a dick but yours seemed to stadn out as a personal attack compared to the rest of the "0MFGZ get a fukin xbox or yoo sukz ballz2 comments oh and for the record to anyone who says get an xbox already got one prefer the pc
It wasn't a personal attack. I think you owe me an apology. And you need to grow some thicker skin if this kind of comment pisses you off that much.
 

spazzattack

New member
Mar 25, 2008
94
0
0
I have the same story, GTA4 also has sloppy controls and is ugly. I'm really disappointed with my purchase of it. Try sending bug reports to Rockstar, and pray for some sort of patch. That's what I've been doing.
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,648
0
0
Reg5879 said:
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.
Fine, then, but it's not exactly helpful to the conversation. In fact, none of this console-A-vs.-console-B talk is; the OP asked about the PC version of a game, in case anyone's forgotten, and suddenly we've veered off into everyone who prefers the PS3 saying the 360 "sucks" and vice versa, as if it were some immutable law of the universe handed down to Moses on a third stone tablet and the millions of gamers who prefer the "sucky" one must all have some kind of mental illness that the Bureau of Mental Retardation apparently missed.

I'm starting to get the impression that the easiest way to maintain useful discussion on a forum is to just set up the system to permaban anyone caught using the word "sucks."
 

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
BolognaBaloney said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
Ps3 may be the most powerful, but since they cant get people to take the much needed time to make games properly for it, then your stuck with a console that is too expensive to make games for; which is the main reason that the price of the console has stayed high. Also there is no noticeable graphical difference in 360 or ps3, I know you'll say it displays truer tones or such, but when you come down to it, if you saw someone playing fallout 3, or gta 4 or such, you could tell simply from the visuals.
The reason why graphics ain't that different on the PS3 and Xbox 360 is because MS wouldn't want to see developers make the PS3 version better and because MS can't contain as much as the PS3, the PS3 version cant be as good as it should be, any game that was released on both consoles would be better as PS3 exclusives and that is the reason most PS3 exclusives are some of the best games of this gen coz the PS3 exclusives dont have MS pulling them back. Also, we got games planned, so it dont matter that some companies are too cheap to make a game for PS3 exclusive standards, we got some good exclusives now and on the way anyway.
 

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
Simply that GTA IV would be much better on the Sega Genesis with the addons than PS3 or 360, when you attached all the genesis addons it needed 3 power supplies making it much more powerful than any system. Just do the math, PS3 and 360 have one power supply each, Genesis+32x+Sega CD has three. That's beyond any systems power requirements, even the coleco vision who's power supply weighs like 3 pounds.

Whoops sorry do the math is an atari jaguar thing, I meant welcome to the next level.
Gaming systems back then were primitive (sort of), so how could they be more powerful??? Also more power supplys doesn't mean the system was more powerful. PS3 is a revolution in the gaming industry and it may be a long time before someone changes that.
 

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
Reg5879 said:
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.
Fine, then, but it's not exactly helpful to the conversation. In fact, none of this console-A-vs.-console-B talk is; the OP asked about the PC version of a game, in case anyone's forgotten, and suddenly we've veered off into everyone who prefers the PS3 saying the 360 "sucks" and vice versa, as if it were some immutable law of the universe handed down to Moses on a third stone tablet and the millions of gamers who prefer the "sucky" one must all have some kind of mental illness that the Bureau of Mental Retardation apparently missed.

I'm starting to get the impression that the easiest way to maintain useful discussion on a forum is to just set up the system to permaban anyone caught using the word "sucks."
Actually, I retaliated to someone that said the PS3 version of GTA IV sucked and it has rolled up into a big discussion, this discussion would have probably not happened if the guy had kept his mouth shut.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,308
0
0
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
Simply that GTA IV would be much better on the Sega Genesis with the addons than PS3 or 360, when you attached all the genesis addons it needed 3 power supplies making it much more powerful than any system. Just do the math, PS3 and 360 have one power supply each, Genesis+32x+Sega CD has three. That's beyond any systems power requirements, even the coleco vision who's power supply weighs like 3 pounds.

Whoops sorry do the math is an atari jaguar thing, I meant welcome to the next level.
Gaming systems back then were primitive (sort of), so how could they be more powerful??? Also more power supplys doesn't mean the system was more powerful. PS3 is a revolution in the gaming industry and it may be a long time before someone changes that.
If you're that blind of a fanboy where you cannot tell when someone is joking then you're really in over your head. If that wasn't clear enough, I was joking. :)

http://i546.photobucket.com/albums/hh408/snotnarok/IMG_1906.jpg

PS3 is not the best system because there's no such thing, it's all down to what the person likes, if you cannot accept that someone might not enjoy the PS3 as much as you do then that's too bad. Personally I don't care about the console, it's about the game, because alone the console is just a pile of parts, with the game then it's a fun machine.
 

Aesthetical Quietus

New member
Mar 4, 2009
402
0
0
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
First of all im not a fanboy. I have a pc,360 and ps3. Im just saying that the sixaxis is once again useless and the shoulder buttons are shit. The xbox version is the best because of no stupid controls and exclusive dlc. Is that enough evidence for you?
How could u bring Sixaxis into it, u dont even use Sixaxis in GTA4, the shoulder buttons have no problems and the controls are better on the PS3, so dont chat shit and as for the DLC, no big loss, it is only a matter of time before the PS3 goes beyond everything in the console market, so MS can just waste money trying to secure exclusive DLC.
I know he said it first, but which controls are better are simply a matter of opinion. I myself hate the new PS3 controller, and would much rather use the PS2 one, but it's still better than the old xBox controller, boy I hated that thing.
Personally, I think the PC's controls are better, but that's just because I hate using console controllers to play games.

I'd like to know what you think the PS3 is going to kill the 360 with(well sort of, since I'm really quite frankly mutual in the area).
Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, MAG, Infamous, God Of War 3 and a few more exclusives planned that I cant think of at the moment. Also, I aint arguing, but why do alot of people like the PC controls???
See, I thought you meant they had some special accessory planned, those games do look kick ass though.
It's a fair question, personally, I like the PC's controls better because I prefer fast accuracy(I can Headshot a person faster in GTA: IV with a mouse, than they can bodyshot me with an controller). It's mostly the mouse, but the keyboard is special in that you have so many mappable commands, so close together.
Controllers clearly have the low down on the PC when it comes to things like racing games(I'm talking basic controller vs keyboard/mouse), but racing games aren't as frequently visted in my game library, so meh.
I never got the point of using a mouse to play games, I think it should always be a controller and using a keyboard and having commands close together, does it matter because the buttons are just as close together on the controller as it is a keyboard, also racing games suck, the last good one was Need For Speed Most Wanted.
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
First of all im not a fanboy. I have a pc,360 and ps3. Im just saying that the sixaxis is once again useless and the shoulder buttons are shit. The xbox version is the best because of no stupid controls and exclusive dlc. Is that enough evidence for you?
How could u bring Sixaxis into it, u dont even use Sixaxis in GTA4, the shoulder buttons have no problems and the controls are better on the PS3, so dont chat shit and as for the DLC, no big loss, it is only a matter of time before the PS3 goes beyond everything in the console market, so MS can just waste money trying to secure exclusive DLC.
I know he said it first, but which controls are better are simply a matter of opinion. I myself hate the new PS3 controller, and would much rather use the PS2 one, but it's still better than the old xBox controller, boy I hated that thing.
Personally, I think the PC's controls are better, but that's just because I hate using console controllers to play games.

I'd like to know what you think the PS3 is going to kill the 360 with(well sort of, since I'm really quite frankly mutual in the area).
Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, MAG, Infamous, God Of War 3 and a few more exclusives planned that I cant think of at the moment. Also, I aint arguing, but why do alot of people like the PC controls???
See, I thought you meant they had some special accessory planned, those games do look kick ass though.
It's a fair question, personally, I like the PC's controls better because I prefer fast accuracy(I can Headshot a person faster in GTA: IV with a mouse, than they can bodyshot me with an controller). It's mostly the mouse, but the keyboard is special in that you have so many mappable commands, so close together.
Controllers clearly have the low down on the PC when it comes to things like racing games(I'm talking basic controller vs keyboard/mouse), but racing games aren't as frequently visited in my game library, so meh.
I never got the point of using a mouse to play games, I think it should always be a controller and using a keyboard and having commands close together, does it matter because the buttons are just as close together on the controller as it is a keyboard, also racing games suck, the last good one was Need For Speed Most Wanted.
A mouse to play games is damn right necessary to play FPS. For precision playing, there is no beating it with any of today's peripherals. A controller simply does not have the ability to move quickly AND precisely, you can only get with-in an approximation fast. That is why console's have auto-lock on, etc. It's also why games like GTA 4, Saints Row, become insanely easy on a PC.
GRID is a pretty good racing game btw. And it does matter, because although the console's controls are close together, you have limited controls mapable, compared to a keyboard. Hence when a game is designed for PC's solely (Which not many of them are these days unfortunately), you have much more control over the game.
 

Aesthetical Quietus

New member
Mar 4, 2009
402
0
0
Steve the Pocket said:
Reg5879 said:
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.
Fine, then, but it's not exactly helpful to the conversation. In fact, none of this console-A-vs.-console-B talk is; the OP asked about the PC version of a game, in case anyone's forgotten, and suddenly we've veered off into everyone who prefers the PS3 saying the 360 "sucks" and vice versa, as if it were some immutable law of the universe handed down to Moses on a third stone tablet and the millions of gamers who prefer the "sucky" one must all have some kind of mental illness that the Bureau of Mental Retardation apparently missed.

I'm starting to get the impression that the easiest way to maintain useful discussion on a forum is to just set up the system to permaban anyone caught using the word "sucks."
While I agree that the discussion is pointless, I fail to see the poster mentioning any specs, or any kind of info we need to help him and as such, I can't help but feel that this was inevitable.
For future posters who need help:
PC Specs
Game Specs
PC driver and driver version
Game version
Legit or non-legit[For example GTA DRM will cause the car your driving to accelerate, have a drunk vision camera amongst other things].
Post these things, and you'll receive help ALOT faster.
 

Tryzon

New member
Jul 19, 2008
700
0
0
I feel increasingly sorry for hardcore PC gamers, not least because the many issues with computer-based games stop me from buying more new PC titles. With all this crap about copy protection software blocking use of real, legally bought, entirely genuine game discs, limited installs and the fact that maddeningly powerful processors are needed for half the things coming out, I'm really put off buying things like Left 4 Dead, which I would otherwise love to have a go on. I'm just glad Fragile Allegiance came out 13 years ago, so it hardly needs a mega-computer to run it.

Also...

kwdav said:
thats an insult i read the requirements and by all logic my pc should have been handling it well and yes i realise everyone else is being a dick but yours seemed to stadn out as a personal attack compared to the rest of the "0MFGZ get a fukin xbox or yoo sukz ballz2 comments oh and for the record to anyone who says get an xbox already got one prefer the pc
Wow. Just...wow. Apart from the quote marks, not a single piece of punctuation. If you want to be taken seriously on the internet, madly typing out something like *THAT* isn't the way to go. Just for the hell of it, allow me to make it many times better:



There we go. That's acceptable. What you wrote is not. I am well aware that being a grammar whore doesn't make me clever, but it does inflate my ego considerably. I particularly love this thread's title. I almost don't mind grammatical wrongness in the thread, but whenever I see a title like this one, I immediately know going in that there will be no clever insight within. Fix it, eh?
 

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
Snotnarok said:
Reg5879 said:
vampirekid.13 said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
microsoft payed rockstar for them to have extra content on the 360, so they did, the 360 one is indeed full of extra content that the ps3 one does not have accessible at all.
No point worrying about DLC coz we all know MS need it coz they know they have the inferior system, i'm looking forward to PS3 exclusives.
I dunno if you're a fanboy or a troll but I'm not going to bother arguing if all you do is praise how good the PS3 is. It's not the system that makes the games fun, it's the games that make the system fun. So enjoy arguing with no one with triple posting.
I'm a fanboy because I choose to be a fanboy, I hate the Xbox 360 because I choose to, it is what makes us human, choices. Quite frankly, I dont have to like the 360 and all I did was defend the console I choose to like above the others, the PS3.

Like what you like, but bashing a console for no reason, and praising another is absurd. I'm not defending the 360 or mocking the PS3, they're both quality systems. Isn't it okay to say that GTA IV is great on either console? It's the game that's fun, not the system, if playing a game on a different system bothers you then I really don't understand where you're coming from. But fanboy isn't a good title to be admitting to considering it basically means "Blind love no matter what, and bash the competition for no reason". Just throwing it out there.
Actually, I wasn't the one that came to this topic and started bashing the Xbox 360, some other guy started bashing the PS3 and I felt angry about his comment and this discussion has escalated and it has turned into an argument and I do hate Xbox with a reason, MS released a dysfunctional console onto the market and got people to buy it, even though it suffered from overheat and it scratches your discs and they knew about it. Also, I have nothing against myself being a fanboy and plus GTA IV would have been better as a PS3 exclusive and it would have been a better game.
Whatever you want to think man. I think it would have been much better exclusive to the Sega Genesis, first off like you said there's no way the disc could get scratched because it runs on cartridges, then they could have come out with a Sega CD expansion disc for realistic radio stations, or they could have gone the whole hog and put out a Sega 32x+CD game for 32 bit graphics and CD quality music. Man those guys were smart, it took 3 power supplies, making it 3 times as powerful as the PS3 or 360 with their single power supply, then stack the blast processing on it and it's no contest!
Dont forget the Sega add-ons for the Genesis suffered malfunctions and nothing is as powerful as a PS3, that is a fact and what has Sega got to do with this???
Simply that GTA IV would be much better on the Sega Genesis with the addons than PS3 or 360, when you attached all the genesis addons it needed 3 power supplies making it much more powerful than any system. Just do the math, PS3 and 360 have one power supply each, Genesis+32x+Sega CD has three. That's beyond any systems power requirements, even the coleco vision who's power supply weighs like 3 pounds.

Whoops sorry do the math is an atari jaguar thing, I meant welcome to the next level.
Gaming systems back then were primitive (sort of), so how could they be more powerful??? Also more power supplys doesn't mean the system was more powerful. PS3 is a revolution in the gaming industry and it may be a long time before someone changes that.
If you're that blind of a fanboy where you cannot tell when someone is joking then you're really in over your head. If that wasn't clear enough, I was joking. :)

http://i546.photobucket.com/albums/hh408/snotnarok/IMG_1906.jpg

PS3 is not the best system because there's no such thing, it's all down to what the person likes, if you cannot accept that someone might not enjoy the PS3 as much as you do then that's too bad. Personally I don't care about the console, it's about the game, because alone the console is just a pile of parts, with the game then it's a fun machine.
Damn you for tricking me lol. Also the better the parts in the system, the better your game could be.
 

Reg5879

New member
Jan 8, 2009
603
0
0
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
First of all im not a fanboy. I have a pc,360 and ps3. Im just saying that the sixaxis is once again useless and the shoulder buttons are shit. The xbox version is the best because of no stupid controls and exclusive dlc. Is that enough evidence for you?
How could u bring Sixaxis into it, u dont even use Sixaxis in GTA4, the shoulder buttons have no problems and the controls are better on the PS3, so dont chat shit and as for the DLC, no big loss, it is only a matter of time before the PS3 goes beyond everything in the console market, so MS can just waste money trying to secure exclusive DLC.
I know he said it first, but which controls are better are simply a matter of opinion. I myself hate the new PS3 controller, and would much rather use the PS2 one, but it's still better than the old xBox controller, boy I hated that thing.
Personally, I think the PC's controls are better, but that's just because I hate using console controllers to play games.

I'd like to know what you think the PS3 is going to kill the 360 with(well sort of, since I'm really quite frankly mutual in the area).
Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, MAG, Infamous, God Of War 3 and a few more exclusives planned that I cant think of at the moment. Also, I aint arguing, but why do alot of people like the PC controls???
See, I thought you meant they had some special accessory planned, those games do look kick ass though.
It's a fair question, personally, I like the PC's controls better because I prefer fast accuracy(I can Headshot a person faster in GTA: IV with a mouse, than they can bodyshot me with an controller). It's mostly the mouse, but the keyboard is special in that you have so many mappable commands, so close together.
Controllers clearly have the low down on the PC when it comes to things like racing games(I'm talking basic controller vs keyboard/mouse), but racing games aren't as frequently visted in my game library, so meh.
I never got the point of using a mouse to play games, I think it should always be a controller and using a keyboard and having commands close together, does it matter because the buttons are just as close together on the controller as it is a keyboard, also racing games suck, the last good one was Need For Speed Most Wanted.
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Aesthetical Quietus said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
Reg5879 said:
Pr0 InSaNiTy said:
You should'nt have got it for PC. The PS3 version sucks ass all the way. 360 FTW!
Give me evidence to back up ur statement, u piece of shit Xbox fanboy. =)
First of all im not a fanboy. I have a pc,360 and ps3. Im just saying that the sixaxis is once again useless and the shoulder buttons are shit. The xbox version is the best because of no stupid controls and exclusive dlc. Is that enough evidence for you?
How could u bring Sixaxis into it, u dont even use Sixaxis in GTA4, the shoulder buttons have no problems and the controls are better on the PS3, so dont chat shit and as for the DLC, no big loss, it is only a matter of time before the PS3 goes beyond everything in the console market, so MS can just waste money trying to secure exclusive DLC.
I know he said it first, but which controls are better are simply a matter of opinion. I myself hate the new PS3 controller, and would much rather use the PS2 one, but it's still better than the old xBox controller, boy I hated that thing.
Personally, I think the PC's controls are better, but that's just because I hate using console controllers to play games.

I'd like to know what you think the PS3 is going to kill the 360 with(well sort of, since I'm really quite frankly mutual in the area).
Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, MAG, Infamous, God Of War 3 and a few more exclusives planned that I cant think of at the moment. Also, I aint arguing, but why do alot of people like the PC controls???
See, I thought you meant they had some special accessory planned, those games do look kick ass though.
It's a fair question, personally, I like the PC's controls better because I prefer fast accuracy(I can Headshot a person faster in GTA: IV with a mouse, than they can bodyshot me with an controller). It's mostly the mouse, but the keyboard is special in that you have so many mappable commands, so close together.
Controllers clearly have the low down on the PC when it comes to things like racing games(I'm talking basic controller vs keyboard/mouse), but racing games aren't as frequently visited in my game library, so meh.
I never got the point of using a mouse to play games, I think it should always be a controller and using a keyboard and having commands close together, does it matter because the buttons are just as close together on the controller as it is a keyboard, also racing games suck, the last good one was Need For Speed Most Wanted.
A mouse to play games is damn right necessary to play FPS. For precision playing, there is no beating it with any of today's peripherals. A controller simply does not have the ability to move quickly AND precisely, you can only get with-in an approximation fast. That is why console's have auto-lock on, etc. It's also why games like GTA 4, Saints Row, become insanely easy on a PC.
GRID is a pretty good racing game btw. And it does matter, because although the console's controls are close together, you have limited controls mapable, compared to a keyboard. Hence when a game is designed for PC's solely (Which not many of them are these days unfortunately), you have much more control over the game.
I will try to give a PC game a try one day to see what the controls are like, but until then, I will stick with the PS3. Also, GRID was ok in my opinion.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
It joins Saints Row 2 in the hall of Broken Crime Simulator PC Ports. Apparently the developers couldn't be bothered.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,308
0
0
lacktheknack said:
It joins Saints Row 2 in the hall of Broken Crime Simulator PC Ports. Apparently the developers couldn't be bothered.
When has a GTA been properly ported to PC? I'm sure GTA 3 would give even a high end PC some problems.