Lyri said:
No, it isn't difficult for other people to find out at all. As long as you know someones name you can start digging up something on them. In this day and age people publicly leave their activities laying around, their resume which gives away a lot of background on a person and their addresses and zip codes are usually easy to get a hold of too. This stuff is simple to get hold of, the only time you worry about it is if they start getting hold of your passwords and account details to important information.
Nope, but the difference is that people have control over what information they are leaving around there. You can find a lot of information about most people on the internet, but only information they have chosen to leave there. In other words, the information you can dig up is their practice of THEIR security-practices and choices about what information to leave.
For example, if i wanted to avoid people digging up information on me, i could start using different usernames for different sites so a search for "Athinira" wouldn't reveal so much.
Lyri said:
You're just guessing here, pure speculation self affirmed by paranoia.
I think you should look up paranoia, because it doesn't mean what you think it means. Paranoia is irrational (or delusional) fear, and speculation alone doesn't make for paranoia if you have good reason to mistrust.
If the FBI is shown to have the information AntiSec claims it has - information which it, btw, shouldn't have - then there is NOTHING to suggest that they don't have even more information than what AntiSec has shown us, possibly including confidental information from peoples phones (texts, e-mails, saved data from applications, in other words information they would only be able to legally obtain with a warrant). Then you consider the history of the FBI (and other organisations like the CIA, NSA) and how they in general aren't trustworthy (not even by their own population), and the fear of your private information is suddenly very real.
Is it true? Not necessarily. Like you said, it's speculation.
Are you still justified in being concerned? Absolutely.
Is it paranoia? Not in a million years.
Lyri said:
Observing the quote most of this information is public record,nothing malicious at all. I hate to be so blunt but the post your making is rampant paranoia and distrust for something so very slight.You're reacting from the boogiemen stories you hear about the FBI and American Law
Boogiemen stories?
Fact: However "unmalicious" these informations are, the fact is that it is information the FBI isn't supposed to have (sure they are supposed to know your name etc., but they aren't supposed to have that information coupled with your Apple phone-information, nor with the Push-tokens).
This raises several questions:
1) Where or how did they get information they aren't supposed to have (did Apple give it to them? Did they hack it from Apple? Or did they get it directly from the phones through hacking/backdoors)? If that happens, then suddenly your privacy (unlike with the internet, where your own security practices are in effect) is dependant on the security practices of Apple, not yourself.
2) If they have this information, do they have more?
3) Why do they have it? Was there any reason to collect it? If they just collect information for giggles, why not collect more?
It comes down to choice. With the internet, i can choose which information i leave. With my mobile-phone, which is an integral part of my privacy, i can't if the creator suddenly starts handing out my information (willingly or through security breaches) to an organisation that i don't trust. In that case, i have VERY good reason to be up in arms.
Luckily i neither have an iPhone or live in America.
Lyri said:
Bold text because I have very little to say on what you wrote.
...apparently because you haven't thought the subject through
)