danimal1384 said:
as far as the whole surviving impact from 2 km, with all the other inconsistencies and story telling problems, why sit and pick at extreme ends about this one, while it is a big one. overall, just either accept it, or don't play the game. i guess it doesn't really matter.
i can't even think right now, though, cause for some reason i'm watching Failure to Launch. i have no idea why and i'm mad at myself for it. but oh well.
by the way, Rumsfeld is an advisor to the President. and he's a retard. correct me if i'm wrong Russ but i think he's the secretary of defense?
A. My understanding is that no one is picking at the 2km fall survival as a minus for the game, or the story, just that it represents something infeasible given the situation. Its a tangent, and not one to be used for criticizing the game (which I don't think anyone was doing in the first place.)
B. I'm sorry.
C. Donald Rumsfeld WAS the Secretary of Defense. He is gone.
@ry02: Terminal velocity is entirely relevant. The whole point of it being that given enough space to fall, you reach terminal velocity, and any further acceleration toward impact is balanced out. So if he fell from very high, or really fricking high, it doesn't matter. The result should be the same, assuming he reaches terminal velocity.
The 500 years in the future bit is fine, but the whole point is that the idea of surviving that fall is counter to modern science, and the series provides no logical extension of modern science to account for the miraculous fall. If they had, this would be an entirely different conversation. I cannot prove that they did not come up with some way to keep your liver from liquifying when the body accelerates very quickly between now and 500 years from now, any more than I can disprove the idea that the world is flat, or that God is real. The lack of proof against something is NOT equivalent to the presence of evidence FOR something. The only evidence for some non-internal-organ-liquification device lies in the survival of the fall itself, and is supported nowhere else. (The impact gel, and shield bubble adjustment arguments do very little to sway me from the idea that stopping very quickly results in death.)