Halo Combat Evolved Anniversary Review

Recommended Videos

Fayathon

Professional Lurker
Nov 18, 2009
905
0
0
Susan Arendt said:
That's ok. We hate you, too. :) Buh-bye, now!
Kind of a shame (not really) that the standards around here are so nice, I don't want to have to go to 4chan to watch someone post completely inane bullshit sometimes.

OT: I'd give Half-Life the honor of paving the way for modern shooters, Halo just took the road and made it more noticeable and open for more people. The review makes it sound like it's just more of the same and if I cared for that I'd pop in my copy of CE and play that with a bunch of friends split scree. (I CBA paying for Gold when I do most of my multiplayer on PC.)
 

Tonythion

New member
Aug 28, 2010
507
0
0
Never had the original, it was a friends and I only got two levels in before they took it back. I still loved it and I knew what happened so when Two came out I just jumped into that.

So I got it release day, I have it set on Legendary. That shit is hard, I'm still only about three levels in and I am dying left and right. Games where harder back in the day, the graphics compared to the original is awesome. I don't see why people are complaining, new RPGs look like the HD remake of Halo so people are just trying to find ways to put Halo down.

It's pretty awesome to re-live my childhood with such an awesome game.
 

daxterx2005

New member
Dec 19, 2009
1,615
0
0
How long do you think the Halo Franchise will stay relevant?
Its been 10 years now, but I can't really see us 15 years in the future celebrating its 25th anniversary.
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,144
0
41
I will never forgive Microsoft for refusing to let me play this on my PC...

EDIT: Watching more of the video... dear god, never have I wanted a game further inside me.
 

repeating integers

New member
Mar 17, 2010
3,314
0
0
daxterx2005 said:
How long do you think the Halo Franchise will stay relevant?
Its been 10 years now, but I can't really see us 15 years in the future celebrating its 25th anniversary.
Eh, I think we might be. You never know.
 

JPArbiter

New member
Oct 14, 2010
337
0
0
daxterx2005 said:
How long do you think the Halo Franchise will stay relevant?
Its been 10 years now, but I can't really see us 15 years in the future celebrating its 25th anniversary.
if 343 had the decency to make games in the Halo Universe, and not recycle S-117 as a protaganist character maybe. I would like to see a Halo Wars 2, or a Tactical Espionage Action game surrounding the Arbiter, more ODST titles, explore an Ace Combat like Flight Sim or a Mass Effect Esque Rolepalyer 343. this forerunner trilogy idea is garbage.
 

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,221
0
0
Russ Pitts said:
i defy you to name another game
Super Metriod :p

but .... that's more or less what i was expecting, 'its prettier and built in online multi-player now'. *shrugs* well, it didn't hold my interest the first time, so i doubt ether of those 'new editions' would have any better luck doing so.
 

Korten12

Now I want ma...!
Aug 26, 2009
10,766
0
0
JPArbiter said:
daxterx2005 said:
How long do you think the Halo Franchise will stay relevant?
Its been 10 years now, but I can't really see us 15 years in the future celebrating its 25th anniversary.
if 343 had the decency to make games in the Halo Universe, and not recycle S-117 as a protaganist character maybe. I would like to see a Halo Wars 2, or a Tactical Espionage Action game surrounding the Arbiter, more ODST titles, explore an Ace Combat like Flight Sim or a Mass Effect Esque Rolepalyer 343. this forerunner trilogy idea is garbage.
Actually it isn't. as shown in Halo: Glasslands, and Halo: Cryptum, there is still much to be shown.
 

TheSapphireKnight

I hate Dire Wolves...
Dec 4, 2008
692
0
0
The more I see of Anniversary the more I am blown away by how beautiful the updated game is. Of course it is not as pretty in terms of texture work or animations as other recent releases, but the new layer adds a lot of life to previously dull corridors.

The colors are just so vibrant the new graphical additions are just such a stark contrast to the relatively muted pallet of recent releases. Reach has objectively better graphics but the art design Anniversary is just more alive and vibrant by comparison(Possibly due to Reach being set on a Human world whose architecture and equipment tends to be 'practical' rather than pretty)

If Anniversary is anything to go by then sign me up for Halo 2: Anniversary because if that is what they can do with CE's relatively dull color scheme than a Halo 2 update is going to be a treat.

Must. Play. Grrrr. Must. Wait. Till. Friday. :(
 

Infernai

New member
Apr 14, 2009
2,605
0
0
Tharwen said:
I will never forgive Microsoft for refusing to let me play this on my PC...
And i wanted to see Halo 3 or reach on PC with the same online as Halo 1...but i know that will never happen due to the fact Microsoft don't want to get too much money for some weird reason..
 

JPArbiter

New member
Oct 14, 2010
337
0
0
Glasslands and Cryptum are prequels not featuring the Chief, which is exactly my point. there is plenty to explore in the Halo universe without the Master Chief needing to be invovled.

Cryptum was also boring as all getout.
 

Proverbial Jon

Not evil, just mildly malevolent
Nov 10, 2009
2,092
0
0
I have only got as far as "The Silent Cartographer" so far, mostly because Skyrim is taking up all my time, but there are a few things that stand out for me with this game:

- The environments are GORGEOUS. I used to play Halo:CE and think it looked beautiful, but switching back and forth between the old and new just showed me how far graphics have come in ten years. Sadly I doubt I'll ever be able to look at the original version of this game ever again.

- Playing the game feels like exactly the same experience I had when I first played it, as if the enhanced graphics are what I really saw in my head ten years ago. They really haven't touched anything in the game engine.

- The improved sounds and remastered soundtrack are incredible. I didn't think there was much point in bothering but the new soundtrack is just crystal clear and a true delight to the ears.

- The weapons feel a lot more substantial.

- The enemies seem an awful lot tougher than I remember... either they tweaked the difficulty or I've just been spoilt by Reach. I played Reach on Legendary and that kicked my ass. Anniversary on Normal isn't even close but I'm still dying more times than I'd like... and I'm good at these games generaly.

- The graphics were not made using the Reach engine. Character models look fine until they open their mouths and the poor lip sync makes them look a little derpy. Keyes looks fantastic but Johnson looks nothing like any of his previous iterations, which is a real shame. Cortana looks as she did in Halo 3, instead of her original Halo:CE form and her annimation seems a little off sometimes.

Overall I'm having a great time, but aside from a nostalgia trip, this game probably isn't worth much more. Considering all 343 had to do was upgrade the graphics and even they look bad in places, it's not the best effort I've seen. I hope they don't use this engine for Halo 4.
 

Worr Monger

New member
Jan 21, 2008
868
0
0
Russ Pitts said:
A fresh coat of paint is all this game needed to remind the world how Bungie brought shooters out of the stone age.
I was always under the impression that Half Life brought shooters out of the stone age...

...And Halo made them consol accessible.
 

Korten12

Now I want ma...!
Aug 26, 2009
10,766
0
0
JPArbiter said:
Glasslands and Cryptum are prequels not featuring the Chief, which is exactly my point. there is plenty to explore in the Halo universe without the Master Chief needing to be invovled.

Cryptum was also boring as all getout.
True, well wrong about Glasslands being a prequel (technically a prequel to Halo 4, but not to the series.) But why is it bad? Master Chief has only been playable in 3 of the 6 Halo Games.

Master Chief has a long backstory, and I believe if they're telling the truth about puting that more into focus for Hlao 4, it could be really good.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,637
0
0
Tharwen said:
I will never forgive Microsoft for refusing to let me play this on my PC...

EDIT: Watching more of the video... dear god, never have I wanted a game further inside me.
Wait, you mean don't have Halo PC, or Custome Edition with all the delicious mods?

Go get it, Custom's free as long as you have Halo PC...
 

Electrogecko

New member
Apr 15, 2010
811
0
0
When it's said that the first Halo stands toe to toe with current FPS' when graphically updated, I see that more of a sign of how little the genre has progressed than an indication of exceptional quality, and I'm aware that sounds more than a little hypocritical coming from someone who enjoyed Ocarina of Time 3d.

I hated Halo1's campaign when I first played it 9 years ago, and I don't use that word lightly (seriously, I found everything past the first couple of levels so boring it made me hysterical). I doubt I'd enjoy it more now that I've become resentful of the entire genre and have had a chance to experience the true brilliance of Half-Life 2.
 

repeating integers

New member
Mar 17, 2010
3,314
0
0
Electrogecko said:
When it's said that the first Halo stands toe to toe with current FPS' when graphically updated, I see that more of a sign of how little the genre has progressed than an indication of exceptional quality, and I'm aware that sounds more than a little hypocritical coming from someone who enjoyed Ocarina of Time 3d.

I hated Halo1's campaign when I first played it 9 years ago, and I don't use that word lightly (seriously, I found everything past the first couple of levels so boring it made me hysterical). I doubt I'd enjoy it more now that I've become resentful of the entire genre and have had a chance to experience the true brilliance of Half-Life 2.
I've never really understood how it's possible to get angry over something being boring. Isn't that a bit of a contradiction of terms? Surely if something's boring, it means you can't feel any real emotion towards it.
 

Jegsimmons

New member
Nov 14, 2010
1,748
0
0
The Plunk said:
I got this game because I liked 3, ODST and Reach. However, I personally found this game to be incredibly shit. The new graphics look terrible (character models don't even have motion captured faces; Cortana's animations are, I'm pretty sure, just copied and pasted from Halo 3; and lots of texture pop-in.) I played through about half the first level and stopped because the gameplay is so outdated. I'm gonna trade it in soon.

I'm sure some people will enjoy it but this was my personal experience, so take it as you may.
all they did was reskin it, no other motion capture or anything was used.which is fine, it has that old halo feel to it. also they are saving alot of equipment and resources for halo 4.

personally, i love this fucking game, and haveing it for only 39.99 with a reach fire fight expansion and bonus matchmaking maps? FUCK YEAH!!! TAKE MY MONEY!!!!

personally, i think the game has aged very well and still holds up even by todays standards.
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,144
0
41
fix-the-spade said:
Tharwen said:
I will never forgive Microsoft for refusing to let me play this on my PC...

EDIT: Watching more of the video... dear god, never have I wanted a game further inside me.
Wait, you mean don't have Halo PC, or Custome Edition with all the delicious mods?

Go get it, Custom's free as long as you have Halo PC...
I mean Anniversary Edition.
 

Ridgemo

New member
Feb 2, 2010
205
0
0
Jegsimmons said:
The Plunk said:
I got this game because I liked 3, ODST and Reach. However, I personally found this game to be incredibly shit. The new graphics look terrible (character models don't even have motion captured faces; Cortana's animations are, I'm pretty sure, just copied and pasted from Halo 3; and lots of texture pop-in.) I played through about half the first level and stopped because the gameplay is so outdated. I'm gonna trade it in soon.

I'm sure some people will enjoy it but this was my personal experience, so take it as you may.
all they did was reskin it, no other motion capture or anything was used.which is fine, it has that old halo feel to it. also they are saving alot of equipment and resources for halo 4.

personally, i love this fucking game, and haveing it for only 39.99 with a reach fire fight expansion and bonus matchmaking maps? FUCK YEAH!!! TAKE MY MONEY!!!!

personally, i think the game has aged very well and still holds up even by todays standards.
Agreed. Before this game came out, I figured that whilst i would enjoy it (huge halo fanboy here), it still wouldn't be as enjoyable as say, Arkham City or Revelations (which i have yet to play).

But as soon as I put it in, heard that fantastic music, I havn't been able to put it down. The new graphics are a joy to behold and the gameplay is still tight.

Quite frankly, if Nintendo is allowed to release OoT 3-4 times and the same mario game countless times, I don't see why people shouldn't be allowed to enjoy Halo CE Anniversary without all the troll haters coming out of the woodwork.

Of course, that's an impossible dream.