Well, I'm willing to bet these will all be game adaptions of First Strike, Contact Harvest, or the Cole Protocol. Maybe each one in between each other within a reasonable space of time like 3 years. Remember, Halo Reach comes out in fall 2010.
It's quite funny how defensive your being on this whole topic, you act like people writing on a forum site will stop the production of a major game title, chill out. Also how do you know that we're outnumbered? Has there been a world wide tally? Do you even know the numbers? Those last questions were just me messing with you, but seriously a group of people stateing that we would like a game franchise to stop making games isn't going to stop the production of said game, so again chill. Also why can't we share in the fact that we would not like to see another Halo game, or that the franchise is beating the dead horse, while your aloud to say that you would like more games. It doesn't seem fair to me.ZeroMachine said:Don't go around saying the series should stop. Do you realize how many people want more Halo? More want than don't, man. You're outnumbered, which is why they are making more.
Could always hope they would really stop with the series.Srkkl said:It's quite funny how defensive your being on this whole topic, you act like people writing on a forum site will stop the production of a major game title, chill out. Also how do you know that we're outnumbered? Has there been a world wide tally? Do you even know the numbers? Those last questions were just me messing with you, but seriously a group of people stateing that we would like a game franchise to stop making games isn't going to stop the production of said game, so again chill. Also why can't we share in the fact that we would not like to see another Halo game, or that the franchise is beating the dead horse, while your aloud to say that you would like more games. It doesn't seem fair to me.ZeroMachine said:Don't go around saying the series should stop. Do you realize how many people want more Halo? More want than don't, man. You're outnumbered, which is why they are making more.
OT: Op did you really expect anything less than more games?
point taken... if so, then why do they still implement these rules? I really don't think kids should play because of all the bad examples online, there was one 5 year old kid that was swearing, then again there was also some 19 year old dude yelling and whining about how we lost a match...HG131 said:M for Mature. You just sunk your own statement. Mature, not 17+ (the number is a suggestion of the "norm"). I know people over 17 who aren't mature enough to play it and I know people under 13 mature enough to play it.kommunizt kat said:That was not directed to american gamers. It was directed to minors that neglected to read the stamp that said "M for mature" I apologize however for the "american" part, It was just an observation since most kids I see were american...The_Oracle said:Call me a fanboy, but I'm glad. Very glad. The Halo universe is a lot deeper than most people think, and the same goes for the story. Bungie's done a superb job of bringing this universe to life, and if this means they get to keep doing what they're doing, then who the heck has a problem with that?
And as time goes on, not only will they likely improve, but we'll get more high-quality games to play and enjoy. Who knows, maybe we'll even get a multiplayer experience from them in a later game that trumps Halo 3's!
...Seconded.ZeroMachine said:I'm sorry, what? The only people that can like Halo are retarded children? And of course, you pull the "from America" card.kommunizt kat said:I guess its because its a fad for little retarded children in the states. They shouldnt even be playing... Good thing I dont live thereZeroMachine said:OK, seriously, I'm sick and fucking tired of people saying there are too many Halo games. There are four, five if you count ODST, and six if you count the yet-to-be-released Reach.
So let's just go with that. Six. How many Call of Duty games are there? How many Mario games are there? How many Pokemon? Grand Theft Auto? Final Fantasy?
I mean, come on, guys. I've never seen a game get bashed for having just six games (one of which barely counts!). How about you just wait and see what games they have coming out and judge them on being a game rather than them being a Halo game? Is it really that hard? Do people really have to ***** and moan this much about a huge franchise? Seriously, it's not like it's a first...
Reported for flaming, you bigot.
On behalf of American gamers everywhere, I apologize.
No.. I think;General Vagueness said:So you think bored school doodles and fan fiction and 4chan posts are the height of art?
School doodles don't fall under the bracket "media" - unless for whatever reason it's communicated somehow.Textbook Bobcat said:Media is better if it is generated "just because" not off the back off something else
*I* read your entire post, or what there was of it:Textbook Bobcat said:Thinking about it, did you even read my post or just jump at the slightest bit of Halo dislike?
Nothing in it suggested any actual analysis. It used a few cliches in a not-particularly imaginative manner and asserted as fact an unsupported and rather overgeneralised statement. That it was also set in a derogatory tone didn't elevated it above its pedestrian origins.Textbook Bobcat said:I feel bad for the people that get sprayed with the milk from this very overfed cash cow.
Fact: Media is better if it is generated "just because" not off the back off something else
When expressing my opinion I don't make an overinflamed effort, with the goal of impressing the masses with how vast my vocabulary is. Unlike many I do not frequent the internet with the aim to convince myself my meagre existence is something more substantial. Speaking hypothetically of course.Anton P. Nym said:*I* read your entire post, or what there was of it:
Nothing in it suggested any actual analysis. It used a few cliches in a not-particularly imaginative manner and asserted as fact an unsupported and rather overgeneralised statement. That it was also set in a derogatory tone didn't elevated it above its pedestrian origins.
Taking things out of context is such a good tool in an attempt to dethrone an argument isn't it?Anton P. Nym said:By the by, much of what we consider great works were generated "off the back of something else"... the Sistine Chapel ceiling, for instance, shouldn't be considered derivative hack-work merely because it recounts Biblical text verbatim in a different medium. Shakespeare wrote knock-offs by the bushel... most better than their originals, truth be told.
"Off the hook" is amusing, it was a further elaboration as the post I replied to confused me; being that it applied to nothing of mine.Anton P. Nym said:Your subsequent post with its idiosyncratic definition of "media" doesn't get you off the hook; in art, "media" can mean the paper (or whatever) art is rendered upon and the inks (or whatever) used to render them. (Pedant point; "media" is a plural term, so it should be "Media are better if....") Without further context, the intent of your usage was unclear. (Not that I accept it, but that's a matter of opinion.)
Hey, you asked.
-- Steve
See, this is your problem, you didn't make it clear what the etc. or the demographic are, and I hear "media" used quite often to refer to different ways of passing information, like books, radio, Internet, etc.-- if you haven't that's fine, but if you have you should've made it clear; you don't need to use "fancy" words but you should make your meaning clear. You addressed a lot of Steve's issues with your post but you didn't mention analysis-- what thought went into what you said? Things that don't seem to have much thought behind them tend to not be taken very seriously, and sometimes taking them seriously can cause issues.Textbook Bobcat said:And for the record, no I did not ask for an individual to come salivating at the mouth to flash whatever words show up on his calendar throughout the year: I merely stated my pity that books, etc are only entertained by the demographic in question if they are steeped in videogame origins.
Agreed, does anyone ever question the number of Mario games made?ZeroMachine said:-snip-
So... You don't like Halo, so noone else is allowed to?Origin Of Resistance said:Kill it now. Seriously, I don't like any of the Halo games. Halo 2 was good, and Halo 3 was tolerable. But now, this is getting silly.
I do all the time as well as Final Fantasy. Those games as well should be stopped so developers can move on to something better, as what I am saying the same should happen with Halo now.The Political Gamer said:Agreed, does anyone ever question the number of Mario games made?ZeroMachine said:-snip-