Hard Questions

LenticularHomicide

LenticularHomicide

New member
Oct 24, 2013
127
0
0
Scars Unseen said:
The real question is what percentage of Critical Miss porn involves Erin making it with her own delusions of video game characters?
Click to expand...
Thirteen-point-six-three-six percent.

To anyone who recognizes the site design: (insert knowing look emoticon here)

 
Reincarnatedwolfgod

Reincarnatedwolfgod

New member
Jan 17, 2011
1,002
0
0
well fapping to rule 34 of your own creation is quite weird on a conceptual level. Then I If your own creation is based on a family member then my response is "No".

Caramel Frappe said:
Makes me wonder if any other developer / creator had to witness their character(s) being drawn in Rule 34 territory.
Click to expand...
this link might interest you.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RuleThirtyFourCreatorReactions

try not to get trapped on tvtropes for too long.
crimsonspear4D said:
snip
Click to expand...
There exist more then just rapey Rule 34 art. Rule 34 can give off a sweet romantic vibe and well it can be many things that not a degrading a strong character and rape.
 
VanQ

VanQ

Casual Plebeian
Oct 23, 2009
2,729
0
0
A wise group of anonymous internet image board users once came up with the true answer to this question.

Incest is wincest.
 
A

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
I checked it out, some of that Erin porn is pretty well done. The White Guy Defense force gang-bang one was interesting.
 
N

Naturally Sound

New member
Jul 30, 2014
46
0
0
FPLOON said:
Of course it's not incestuous... But, then you realize that all that Rule 34 of the character you created is noting more than pseudo-pandering to your sexual needs/fantasies... So, as long as you don't have any moral standing on masturbation to a explicit representation of your own character, then don't forget to jerk/rub/insert responsibility...

Other than that, none of the Rule 34 of Erin has appealed to me phonetically speaking...
Click to expand...
People create fap characters all the time. Erin is a character designed to be realistic and relatable. While there is no denying Rule 34 of any and all known media characters that have gained public recognition, finding characters that aren't being sexualized is limited to barely-known OCs with terrible personalities and/or fashion sense made by a non-fantasizing creator...which does not make sense.
 
Vault101

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
mabye I've spent too much time amongst femslash comunities but nothing about rule34 as a concept squicks me out...most people have sex why can't fictional charachters?

then again a lot of rule34 made to appeal to straight guys is...pretty graphic, unlike my prefered rule34 which is sexual but in a [i/]nice[/i] way
 
FPLOON

FPLOON

Your #1 Source for the Dino Porn
Jul 10, 2013
12,531
0
0
Naturally Sound said:
FPLOON said:
Of course it's not incestuous... But, then you realize that all that Rule 34 of the character you created is noting more than pseudo-pandering to your sexual needs/fantasies... So, as long as you don't have any moral standing on masturbation to a explicit representation of your own character, then don't forget to jerk/rub/insert responsibility...

Other than that, none of the Rule 34 of Erin has appealed to me phonetically speaking...
Click to expand...
People create fap characters all the time. Erin is a character designed to be realistic and relatable. While there is no denying Rule 34 of any and all known media characters that have gained public recognition, finding characters that aren't being sexualized is limited to barely-known OCs with terrible personalities and/or fashion sense made by a non-fantasizing creator...which does not make sense.
Click to expand...
With that kind of logic, I can assume that the lack of Rule 34 for the show Get Ed falls under the latter more than the formal, right?
 
Fox12

Fox12

AccursedT- see you space cowboy
Jun 6, 2013
4,828
0
0
Well, I looked up Critical Miss rule 34. All I found was this. Enjoy.
 
talker

talker

New member
Nov 18, 2011
313
0
0
...I only just realized there was a pun in the title. "Hard" questions. That's a bit stiff, isn't it?
 
Gaboris

Gaboris

New member
Dec 22, 2011
33
0
0
Hehe, poor Cory. Hope he'll recover. :D
...
Wait. MORE rule 34 you say? Hmmm... Ohhh Goooogle!
...
Awww... disappointing.
 
N

Naturally Sound

New member
Jul 30, 2014
46
0
0
FPLOON said:
Naturally Sound said:
FPLOON said:
Of course it's not incestuous... But, then you realize that all that Rule 34 of the character you created is noting more than pseudo-pandering to your sexual needs/fantasies... So, as long as you don't have any moral standing on masturbation to a explicit representation of your own character, then don't forget to jerk/rub/insert responsibility...

Other than that, none of the Rule 34 of Erin has appealed to me phonetically speaking...
Click to expand...
People create fap characters all the time. Erin is a character designed to be realistic and relatable. While there is no denying Rule 34 of any and all known media characters that have gained public recognition, finding characters that aren't being sexualized is limited to barely-known OCs with terrible personalities and/or fashion sense made by a non-fantasizing creator...which does not make sense.
Click to expand...
With that kind of logic, I can assume that the lack of Rule 34 for the show Get Ed falls under the latter more than the formal, right?
Click to expand...
Probably! I don't even know what the hell that show is, but that is small-world thinking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom