Seconded...in fact that post appears to be made of 100% pure win with no fillers.Zhukov said:I am posting here for the sole reason of informing that above poster that his comment cracked me up.DVS BSTrD said:He's the smuggler who made the bathroom run in less than 12 parsecs.
The EU doesn't stop after 40 years, it just timejumps 100 years into the future with the Legacy of the Force comic series (Cade Skywalker and resurgence of the Sith Empire and all that).DjinnFor said:The plot, however, intrigues me: 40 years later is about the time when the Expanded Universe kinda just stops (as in authors haven't written much). One of the more recently written EU series' is called "Fate of the Jedi" and takes place after a major civil war amidst growing return of the Sith (very original, as you can tell). That said, his role in this series involves quite a lot of action as a primary character alongside Leia Solo, Luke Skywalker, and some of their kids. So I doubt they'd actually do that point in time.
So if Harrison Ford is getting a decent role it would be some time after the conclusion of that series, I assume. So either they're bypassing most of the EU canon by setting it far in the future and making a totally new story, they're butchering the EU canon, or they're just going to have him cameo.
I think they already stated that they won't be working with the EU.kael013 said:Well, since the EU has had Han be a badass well into old age, this could be fine. However, I've been skeptical of this "sequel trilogy" ever since it was announced for multiple reasons - Disney in charge, JJ Abrams directing (granted this one is only a mild worry since I liked the Star Trek reboot), that whole "Are they going to respect the EU?" question - and this is now another worry to add to the list (possibly cashing in on the remaining love for the original trilogy with cameos). I don't care about casting information; I want information about how dark it's going to be and when it's set (so I'll know which EU books I may have to throw out).
How exactly does C-3PO not fall into the "wears a costume" category? Heck, I don't even remember the name of the guy in the suit, nor what he looks like.Chessrook44 said:One down, four to go...
By that I mean Luke, Leia, Lando, and 3PO. Everyone else who might show up in the version of episode 7 that I want to see is minor enough that they can be replaced with a look-alike, wears a costume, or is dead.
All hail Timothy Zahn!j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Hmmm... hopefully if Solo is already going to be old in this film, that means they're not rewriting/retconning the Thrawn trilogy. I know the EU has its fair share of crap, but those books are too legitimately good to be retconned out of existence.
I wouldn't be too upset if they did the Zahn books and just made it happen later than the 5 years after Endor that it was supposed to be. I'd even be ok with having Han and Leia's kids be the main characters rather than Luke and Crew. Have Luke running the Jedi academy and Han a senator or some such and the new Jedi take a lead role with the old folks in the background. Really I just want to see Ian McKellan painted blue with possibly John Barrowman as Paelleon (the Empire needs to remain white brits).TheCaptain said:All hail Timothy Zahn!j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Hmmm... hopefully if Solo is already going to be old in this film, that means they're not rewriting/retconning the Thrawn trilogy. I know the EU has its fair share of crap, but those books are too legitimately good to be retconned out of existence.
That's always been the one person who kept Star Wars alive for me through it all, and these books are kinda impossible to adapt to screen given the age of the actors anyway... So they'll just ignore that there's already a story right there. Which I find incredibly disrespectful towards the authors who've shaped that universe these past thirty years...
You and I imagine Thrawn and the good Captain very differently. Especially when it comes to age.thetoddo said:Really I just want to see Ian McKellan painted blue with possibly John Barrowman as Paelleon (the Empire needs to remain white brits).
If you're setting it 30+ years after Endor Thrawn would be getting up there in years (though not knowing how long Chiss live I suppose a case could be made for someone younger if they have a longer lifespan) and I think in that case the Paelleon role would be better played by a younger protege who Thrawn is training. If they had done the Trawn trilogy in the 80s I'd be right on board with having both characters played by actors in their 40s/50s.TheCaptain said:You and I imagine Thrawn and the good Captain very differently. Especially when it comes to age.thetoddo said:Really I just want to see Ian McKellan painted blue with possibly John Barrowman as Paelleon (the Empire needs to remain white brits).
Well, Paelleon was already a Star Destroyer Captain at Endor, I would've a really hard time getting used to a much younger version of him... the "old soldier" persona is kind of integral for the character. And while Chiss age generally faster due to their more active metabolism, they've rarely been depicted as looking old, so McKellan... hm.thetoddo said:If you're setting it 30+ years after Endor Thrawn would be getting up there in years (though not knowing how long Chiss live I suppose a case could be made for someone younger if they have a longer lifespan) and I think in that case the Paelleon role would be better played by a younger protege who Thrawn is training. If they had done the Trawn trilogy in the 80s I'd be right on board with having both characters played by actors in their 40s/50s.TheCaptain said:You and I imagine Thrawn and the good Captain very differently. Especially when it comes to age.thetoddo said:Really I just want to see Ian McKellan painted blue with possibly John Barrowman as Paelleon (the Empire needs to remain white brits).