Yeah. I agree. If they changed it up and tried something every game it might seem like its worth it but just look at the releases.Onyxious said:The problem with COD is, it's fallen into a rut. It's fan service now and it's not trying anything new.
Personally I love Halo the most out of all FPS's but you have in release order:
Halo 3 -> CoD4 -> WaW -> MW2 ->Blops/Halo Reach within a month or two.
CoD came out with four games in the timespan of Halo's one. It kinda gives the illusion that although there's barely anything new with each game, there's something new coming out all the time. It took Halo over 10 years to come out with 4 solid-direct sequel games where CoD took what... 2-3 years?
It can't keep it up for too much longer, and now with Microsoft in charge of Halo instead of Bungie I fear that Halo will fall into that same rut as well. I'm willing to give 343 a shot though before dismissing them as corporate cash-in developer with no intent on trying anything really risky. Because even though the Halo sequels are well spaced out, IMO, it doesn't mean they aren't getting a bit stale.